This is a minimal effort to fix up the code. There's substantial code
cleanup which can now be done, which is done in the next change.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: Iafcf5e814837d9534889e8c21333de4931a19cfa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32864
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
A common base class is required to move from std::unique_ptr<> to raw pointers for AST types.
Also unifies a bunch of similar APIs.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: If829f8c3f22069adf62751365f1f1eeb646aba08
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32660
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Once a `Decoration` has been parsed, it'll be placed into a `DecorationList` and validated later in the parse. In order to create error diagnostics that refer back to the decoration, we need to know its source.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: I38de708adbd041601b61d7e0a4d0402e9a2fe526
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31722
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This is the first step in unifying the way decorations are parsed - i.e. instead of parsing decorations in different ways based on the predicted grammar that follows, we can parse decorations blocks in a unified way, then later verify what we have is as expected.
`StructDecoration` has been transformed from an `enum class` to a proper class so it can derive from `Decoration`.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: Iaf12d266068d03edf695acdf2cd21e6cc3ea8eb3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31663
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Ben Clayton