This consistency can be utilized by the ast::Builder to inject the source parameter if it isn't provided.
Bug: tint:396
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I2f19002131e79daae799b8cbe918eb192d6bfc75
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35503
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
The following DecorationKinds were sub-types of core decoration types:
kStride, kStage, kWorkgroup, kStructMemberOffset, kAccess, kBinding, kBuiltin, kConstantId, kLocation
These only existed for casting (not for error messages), and are no longer needed, so remove them.
Change-Id: I1e4bb9bf51952c6e86bac984d0d667a071ca80bf
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34303
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
And replace the use of`ast::As(Decoration* deco)` with `Castable::As<T>()`.
These were used for dynamic casting, but is now replaced with Castable.
Change-Id: Ie5fe19ad4db4bc4d19f5386d2cfddaaf84b215d0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34302
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
The hand-rolled `AsBlah()`, `IsBlah()` methods will be migrated in future changes.
Change-Id: I078c100b561b50018771cc38c1cac4379c393424
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34301
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Instead of just having a single `DecorationKind` for the first
derivation from `Decoration`, have a `DecorationKind` for every
decoration type.
Add `Decoration::IsKind()` to test whether the decoration is of, or
derives from the given kind.
Note, this change is originally by bclayton@ from
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33201R=bclayton@google.com
Bug: tint:287
Change-Id: I69b51dfaa3f82ef4d61cda383b2f98f401013429
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33280
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is a minimal effort to fix up the code. There's substantial code
cleanup which can now be done, which is done in the next change.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: Iafcf5e814837d9534889e8c21333de4931a19cfa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32864
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
create() is currently just a simple forwarder to std::make_unique<>, but
will be later replaced with a function that returns a raw pointer,
and owned by the context.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: I0e68992963f52e432d4d485feae1123f35732552
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32664
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
It doesn't actually do anything (yet), but will hold the context and
a helper for constructing AST nodes.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: Ic7ba92bf39abf64ff2ac51d81c8a6338f5eff608
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32663
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Once a `Decoration` has been parsed, it'll be placed into a `DecorationList` and validated later in the parse. In order to create error diagnostics that refer back to the decoration, we need to know its source.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: I38de708adbd041601b61d7e0a4d0402e9a2fe526
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31722
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This is the first step in unifying the way decorations are parsed - i.e. instead of parsing decorations in different ways based on the predicted grammar that follows, we can parse decorations blocks in a unified way, then later verify what we have is as expected.
`StructDecoration` has been transformed from an `enum class` to a proper class so it can derive from `Decoration`.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: Iaf12d266068d03edf695acdf2cd21e6cc3ea8eb3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31663
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Ben Clayton
dan sinclair