This will be used to detect accidental leaks of program objects between programs.
Bug: tint:709
Change-Id: I20f784a2c673d19a04a880b3ec91dfe2eb743bdb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47622
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This is a commonly used pattern.
Change-Id: I698397c93c33db64c53cbe8662186e1976075b80
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47280
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Remove the decoration groupings (Array, Function, Struct,
StructMember, Type, Variable), such that all *Decoration classes now
subclass ast::Decoration directly. This allows for decorations to be
used in multiple places; for example, builtin decorations are now
valid for both variables and struct members.
Checking that decoration lists only contain decorations that are valid
for the node that they are attached to is now done inside the
validator.
Change-Id: Ie8c0e53e5730a7dedea50a1dec8f26f9e7b00e8d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44320
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
The readers must not produce invalid ASTs.
If readers cannot produce a valid AST, then they should error instead.
If a reader does produce an invalid AST, this change catches this bad behavior early, significantly helping identify the root of the broken logic.
IsValid() made a bit more sense in the days where the AST was mutable, and was constructed by calling setters on the nodes to build up the tree.
In order to detect bad ASTs, IsValid() would have to perform an entire AST traversal and give a yes / no answer for the entire tree. Not only was this slow, an answer of 'no' didn't tell you *where* the AST was invalid, resulting in a lot of manual debugging.
Now that the AST is fully immutable, all child nodes need to be built before their parents. The AST node constructors now become a perfect place to perform pointer sanity checking.
The argument for attempting to catch and handle invalid ASTs is not a compelling one.
Invalid ASTs are invalid compiler behavior, not something that should ever happen with a correctly functioning compiler.
If this were to happen in production, the user would be utterly clueless to _why_ the program is invalid, or _how_ to fix it.
Attempting to handle invalid ASTs is just masking a much larger problem.
Let's just let the fuzzers do their job to catch any of these cases early.
Fixed: chromium:1185569
Change-Id: I6496426a3a9da9d42627d2c1ca23917bfd04cc5c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44048
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
All includes from .cc to .h are preserved, even when transitively included.
It's clear that there are far too many includes in header files, and we should be more aggressive with forward declarations. tint:532 will continue to track this work.
There are, however, plenty of includes that have accumulated over time which are no longer required directly or transitively, so this change starts with a clean slate of *required* includes.
Bug: tint:532
Change-Id: Ie1718dad565f8309fa180ef91bcf3920e76dba18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44042
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
The following DecorationKinds were sub-types of core decoration types:
kStride, kStage, kWorkgroup, kStructMemberOffset, kAccess, kBinding, kBuiltin, kConstantId, kLocation
These only existed for casting (not for error messages), and are no longer needed, so remove them.
Change-Id: I1e4bb9bf51952c6e86bac984d0d667a071ca80bf
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34303
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
And replace the use of`ast::As(Decoration* deco)` with `Castable::As<T>()`.
These were used for dynamic casting, but is now replaced with Castable.
Change-Id: Ie5fe19ad4db4bc4d19f5386d2cfddaaf84b215d0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34302
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
The hand-rolled `AsBlah()`, `IsBlah()` methods will be migrated in future changes.
Change-Id: I078c100b561b50018771cc38c1cac4379c393424
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34301
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reduces the per-instance size for an extra vtable entry.
Change-Id: Ie087e0b8d8524adf85663ab1224fb0ae1a5e0000
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34300
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Instead of just having a single `DecorationKind` for the first
derivation from `Decoration`, have a `DecorationKind` for every
decoration type.
Add `Decoration::IsKind()` to test whether the decoration is of, or
derives from the given kind.
Note, this change is originally by bclayton@ from
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33201R=bclayton@google.com
Bug: tint:287
Change-Id: I69b51dfaa3f82ef4d61cda383b2f98f401013429
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33280
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is a minimal effort to fix up the code. There's substantial code
cleanup which can now be done, which is done in the next change.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: Iafcf5e814837d9534889e8c21333de4931a19cfa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32864
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
A common base class is required to move from std::unique_ptr<> to raw pointers for AST types.
Also unifies a bunch of similar APIs.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: If829f8c3f22069adf62751365f1f1eeb646aba08
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32660
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Once a `Decoration` has been parsed, it'll be placed into a `DecorationList` and validated later in the parse. In order to create error diagnostics that refer back to the decoration, we need to know its source.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: I38de708adbd041601b61d7e0a4d0402e9a2fe526
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31722
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This is the first step in unifying the way decorations are parsed - i.e. instead of parsing decorations in different ways based on the predicted grammar that follows, we can parse decorations blocks in a unified way, then later verify what we have is as expected.
`StructDecoration` has been transformed from an `enum class` to a proper class so it can derive from `Decoration`.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: Iaf12d266068d03edf695acdf2cd21e6cc3ea8eb3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31663
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Ben Clayton
James Price
dan sinclair