mirror of https://github.com/encounter/SDL.git
stdinc: Add a comment to clarify why inline functions are needed here
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f7280dcebb
commit
8ab3ae98f0
|
@ -752,6 +752,9 @@ SDL_FORCE_INLINE int SDL_size_mul_overflow (size_t a,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if _SDL_HAS_BUILTIN(__builtin_mul_overflow)
|
||||
/* This needs to be wrapped in an inline rather than being a direct #define,
|
||||
* because __builtin_mul_overflow() is type-generic, but we want to be
|
||||
* consistent about interpreting a and b as size_t. */
|
||||
SDL_FORCE_INLINE int _SDL_size_mul_overflow_builtin (size_t a,
|
||||
size_t b,
|
||||
size_t *ret)
|
||||
|
@ -779,6 +782,8 @@ SDL_FORCE_INLINE int SDL_size_add_overflow (size_t a,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if _SDL_HAS_BUILTIN(__builtin_add_overflow)
|
||||
/* This needs to be wrapped in an inline rather than being a direct #define,
|
||||
* the same as the call to __builtin_mul_overflow() above. */
|
||||
SDL_FORCE_INLINE int _SDL_size_add_overflow_builtin (size_t a,
|
||||
size_t b,
|
||||
size_t *ret)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue