encounter
/
dawn-cmake
mirror of https://github.com/encounter/dawn-cmake.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dawn-cmake/test/vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/spv-stable-mergesort-O-prop.../1.wgsl.expected.spvasm

735 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; SPIR-V
; Version: 1.3
; Generator: Google Tint Compiler; 0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
; Bound: 421
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; Schema: 0
OpCapability Shader
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%166 = OpExtInstImport "GLSL.std.450"
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
OpEntryPoint Fragment %main "main" %tint_symbol %tint_symbol_2
OpExecutionMode %main OriginUpperLeft
OpName %buf0 "buf0"
OpMemberName %buf0 0 "injectionSwitch"
OpName %x_8 "x_8"
OpName %gl_FragCoord "gl_FragCoord"
OpName %x_GLF_color "x_GLF_color"
OpName %tint_symbol "tint_symbol"
OpName %tint_symbol_2 "tint_symbol_2"
OpName %main_1 "main_1"
OpName %temp "temp"
OpName %data "data"
OpName %x_190 "x_190"
OpName %x_262 "x_262"
OpName %x_63_phi "x_63_phi"
OpName %x_103_phi "x_103_phi"
OpName %x_112_phi "x_112_phi"
OpName %x_263_phi "x_263_phi"
OpName %x_100 "x_100"
OpName %x_98 "x_98"
OpName %x_96 "x_96"
OpName %x_94 "x_94"
OpName %x_92 "x_92"
OpName %x_90 "x_90"
OpName %x_88 "x_88"
OpName %x_86 "x_86"
OpName %x_84 "x_84"
OpName %x_82 "x_82"
OpName %x_64_phi "x_64_phi"
OpName %x_104 "x_104"
OpName %x_113 "x_113"
OpName %x_119_phi "x_119_phi"
OpName %x_131 "x_131"
OpName %x_136 "x_136"
OpName %x_131_phi "x_131_phi"
OpName %x_134_phi "x_134_phi"
OpName %x_136_phi "x_136_phi"
OpName %x_158_phi "x_158_phi"
OpName %x_161_phi "x_161_phi"
OpName %x_171_phi "x_171_phi"
OpName %x_151 "x_151"
OpName %x_154 "x_154"
OpName %x_135_phi "x_135_phi"
OpName %x_137_phi "x_137_phi"
OpName %x_159 "x_159"
OpName %x_162 "x_162"
OpName %x_172 "x_172"
OpName %x_181 "x_181"
OpName %x_199 "x_199"
OpName %x_261 "x_261"
OpName %x_262_phi "x_262_phi"
OpName %x_208 "x_208"
OpName %x_260 "x_260"
OpName %x_261_phi "x_261_phi"
OpName %x_217 "x_217"
OpName %x_259 "x_259"
OpName %x_260_phi "x_260_phi"
OpName %x_230 "x_230"
OpName %x_258 "x_258"
OpName %x_259_phi "x_259_phi"
OpName %x_239 "x_239"
OpName %x_257 "x_257"
OpName %x_258_phi "x_258_phi"
OpName %x_248 "x_248"
OpName %x_256 "x_256"
OpName %x_257_phi "x_257_phi"
OpName %main_out "main_out"
OpMemberName %main_out 0 "x_GLF_color_1"
OpName %tint_symbol_3 "tint_symbol_3"
OpName %tint_symbol_1 "tint_symbol_1"
OpName %main "main"
OpDecorate %buf0 Block
OpMemberDecorate %buf0 0 Offset 0
OpDecorate %x_8 NonWritable
OpDecorate %x_8 DescriptorSet 0
OpDecorate %x_8 Binding 0
OpDecorate %tint_symbol BuiltIn FragCoord
OpDecorate %tint_symbol_2 Location 0
OpDecorate %_arr_int_uint_10 ArrayStride 4
OpMemberDecorate %main_out 0 Offset 0
%float = OpTypeFloat 32
%v2float = OpTypeVector %float 2
%buf0 = OpTypeStruct %v2float
%_ptr_Uniform_buf0 = OpTypePointer Uniform %buf0
%x_8 = OpVariable %_ptr_Uniform_buf0 Uniform
%v4float = OpTypeVector %float 4
%_ptr_Private_v4float = OpTypePointer Private %v4float
%9 = OpConstantNull %v4float
%gl_FragCoord = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %9
%x_GLF_color = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %9
%_ptr_Input_v4float = OpTypePointer Input %v4float
%tint_symbol = OpVariable %_ptr_Input_v4float Input
%_ptr_Output_v4float = OpTypePointer Output %v4float
%tint_symbol_2 = OpVariable %_ptr_Output_v4float Output %9
%void = OpTypeVoid
%15 = OpTypeFunction %void
%int = OpTypeInt 32 1
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%uint_10 = OpConstant %uint 10
%_arr_int_uint_10 = OpTypeArray %int %uint_10
%_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_10 = OpTypePointer Function %_arr_int_uint_10
%25 = OpConstantNull %_arr_int_uint_10
%_ptr_Function_float = OpTypePointer Function %float
%29 = OpConstantNull %float
%_ptr_Function_int = OpTypePointer Function %int
%33 = OpConstantNull %int
%uint_0 = OpConstant %uint 0
%_ptr_Uniform_float = OpTypePointer Uniform %float
%int_0 = OpConstant %int 0
%60 = OpConstantComposite %_arr_int_uint_10 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0
%int_1 = OpConstant %int 1
%int_n5 = OpConstant %int -5
%int_n4 = OpConstant %int -4
%int_n3 = OpConstant %int -3
%int_n2 = OpConstant %int -2
%int_n1 = OpConstant %int -1
%int_2 = OpConstant %int 2
%int_3 = OpConstant %int 3
%int_4 = OpConstant %int 4
%int_10 = OpConstant %int 10
%bool = OpTypeBool
%int_9 = OpConstant %int 9
%uint_1 = OpConstant %uint 1
%_ptr_Private_float = OpTypePointer Private %float
%int_30 = OpConstant %int 30
%float_0_5 = OpConstant %float 0.5
%float_0_100000001 = OpConstant %float 0.100000001
%int_60 = OpConstant %int 60
%int_90 = OpConstant %int 90
%int_120 = OpConstant %int 120
%int_150 = OpConstant %int 150
%int_180 = OpConstant %int 180
%int_5 = OpConstant %int 5
%int_210 = OpConstant %int 210
%int_6 = OpConstant %int 6
%int_240 = OpConstant %int 240
%int_7 = OpConstant %int 7
%int_270 = OpConstant %int 270
%int_8 = OpConstant %int 8
%float_1 = OpConstant %float 1
%main_out = OpTypeStruct %v4float
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%408 = OpTypeFunction %void %main_out
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_1 = OpFunction %void None %15
%18 = OpLabel
%temp = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_10 Function %25
%data = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_10 Function %25
%x_190 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_262 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_63_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_103_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_112_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_263_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_100 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_98 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_96 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_94 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_92 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_90 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_88 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_86 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_84 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_82 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_64_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_104 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_113 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_119_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_131 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_136 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_131_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_134_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_136_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_158_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_161_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_171_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_151 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_154 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_135_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_137_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_159 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_162 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_172 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_181 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_199 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_261 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_262_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_208 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_260 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_261_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_217 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_259 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_260_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_230 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_258 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_259_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_239 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_257 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_258_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_248 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_256 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_257_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%39 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_float %x_8 %uint_0 %uint_0
%40 = OpLoad %float %39
%41 = OpConvertFToS %int %40
OpStore %x_63_phi %41
OpBranch %42
%42 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %43 %44 None
OpBranch %45
%45 = OpLabel
%57 = OpLoad %int %x_63_phi
%58 = OpLoad %_arr_int_uint_10 %data
OpStore %data %60
OpStore %data %58
%62 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_64_phi %62
OpSelectionMerge %63 None
OpSwitch %57 %64 9 %65 8 %66 7 %67 6 %68 5 %69 4 %70 3 %71 2 %72 1 %73 0 %74
%65 = OpLabel
%75 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %75 %int_n5
%77 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_100 %77
%78 = OpLoad %int %x_100
OpStore %x_64_phi %78
OpBranch %63
%66 = OpLabel
%79 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %79 %int_n4
%81 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_98 %81
%82 = OpLoad %int %x_98
OpStore %x_64_phi %82
OpBranch %63
%67 = OpLabel
%83 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %83 %int_n3
%85 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_96 %85
%86 = OpLoad %int %x_96
OpStore %x_64_phi %86
OpBranch %63
%68 = OpLabel
%87 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %87 %int_n2
%89 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_94 %89
%90 = OpLoad %int %x_94
OpStore %x_64_phi %90
OpBranch %63
%69 = OpLabel
%91 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %91 %int_n1
%93 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_92 %93
%94 = OpLoad %int %x_92
OpStore %x_64_phi %94
OpBranch %63
%70 = OpLabel
%95 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %95 %int_0
%96 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_90 %96
%97 = OpLoad %int %x_90
OpStore %x_64_phi %97
OpBranch %63
%71 = OpLabel
%98 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %98 %int_1
%99 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_88 %99
%100 = OpLoad %int %x_88
OpStore %x_64_phi %100
OpBranch %63
%72 = OpLabel
%101 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %101 %int_2
%103 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_86 %103
%104 = OpLoad %int %x_86
OpStore %x_64_phi %104
OpBranch %63
%73 = OpLabel
%105 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %105 %int_3
%107 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_84 %107
%108 = OpLoad %int %x_84
OpStore %x_64_phi %108
OpBranch %63
%74 = OpLabel
%109 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %109 %int_4
%111 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_82 %111
%112 = OpLoad %int %x_82
OpStore %x_64_phi %112
OpBranch %63
%64 = OpLabel
OpBranch %63
%63 = OpLabel
%113 = OpLoad %int %x_64_phi
OpBranch %44
%44 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_63_phi %113
%115 = OpSLessThan %bool %113 %int_10
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranchConditional %115 %42 %43
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%43 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_103_phi %int_0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranch %117
%117 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %118 %119 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %120
%120 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%122 = OpLoad %int %x_103_phi
%123 = OpSLessThan %bool %122 %int_10
OpSelectionMerge %124 None
OpBranchConditional %123 %125 %126
%125 = OpLabel
OpBranch %124
%126 = OpLabel
OpBranch %118
%124 = OpLabel
OpBranch %119
%119 = OpLabel
%127 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %122
%128 = OpLoad %int %127
%129 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %122
OpStore %129 %128
%130 = OpIAdd %int %122 %int_1
OpStore %x_104 %130
%131 = OpLoad %int %x_104
OpStore %x_103_phi %131
OpBranch %117
%118 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpStore %x_112_phi %int_1
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranch %132
%132 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %133 %134 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %135
%135 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%138 = OpLoad %int %x_112_phi
%140 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %138 %int_9
OpSelectionMerge %141 None
OpBranchConditional %140 %142 %143
%142 = OpLabel
OpBranch %141
%143 = OpLabel
OpBranch %133
%141 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_119_phi %int_0
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %144
%144 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpLoopMerge %145 %146 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %147
%147 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%156 = OpLoad %int %x_119_phi
%157 = OpSLessThan %bool %156 %int_9
OpSelectionMerge %158 None
OpBranchConditional %157 %159 %160
%159 = OpLabel
OpBranch %158
%160 = OpLabel
OpBranch %145
%158 = OpLabel
%161 = OpIAdd %int %156 %138
%162 = OpISub %int %161 %int_1
%163 = OpIMul %int %int_2 %138
%164 = OpIAdd %int %156 %163
%167 = OpISub %int %164 %int_1
%165 = OpExtInst %int %166 SMin %167 %int_9
OpStore %x_131_phi %156
OpStore %x_134_phi %161
OpStore %x_136_phi %156
OpBranch %168
%168 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %169 %170 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %171
%171 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%176 = OpLoad %int %x_131_phi
OpStore %x_131 %176
%177 = OpLoad %int %x_134_phi
%178 = OpLoad %int %x_136_phi
OpStore %x_136 %178
%179 = OpLoad %int %x_136
%180 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %179 %162
OpSelectionMerge %181 None
OpBranchConditional %180 %182 %181
%182 = OpLabel
%183 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %177 %165
OpBranch %181
%181 = OpLabel
%184 = OpPhi %bool %180 %171 %183 %182
OpSelectionMerge %185 None
OpBranchConditional %184 %186 %187
%186 = OpLabel
OpBranch %185
%187 = OpLabel
OpBranch %169
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%185 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%188 = OpLoad %int %x_136
%189 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %188
%190 = OpLoad %int %189
%191 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %177
%192 = OpLoad %int %191
%194 = OpLoad %int %x_131
%195 = OpCopyObject %int %int_1
%196 = OpIAdd %int %194 %195
%193 = OpCopyObject %int %196
%197 = OpSLessThan %bool %190 %192
OpSelectionMerge %198 None
OpBranchConditional %197 %199 %200
%199 = OpLabel
%202 = OpLoad %int %x_136
%203 = OpCopyObject %int %int_1
%204 = OpIAdd %int %202 %203
%201 = OpCopyObject %int %204
OpStore %x_151 %201
%205 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %188
%206 = OpLoad %int %205
%207 = OpLoad %int %x_131
%208 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %207
OpStore %208 %206
OpStore %x_135_phi %177
%209 = OpLoad %int %x_151
OpStore %x_137_phi %209
OpBranch %198
%200 = OpLabel
%210 = OpIAdd %int %177 %int_1
OpStore %x_154 %210
%211 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %177
%212 = OpLoad %int %211
%213 = OpLoad %int %x_131
%214 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %213
OpStore %214 %212
%215 = OpLoad %int %x_154
OpStore %x_135_phi %215
%216 = OpLoad %int %x_136
OpStore %x_137_phi %216
OpBranch %198
%198 = OpLabel
%217 = OpLoad %int %x_135_phi
%218 = OpLoad %int %x_137_phi
OpBranch %170
%170 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_131_phi %193
OpStore %x_134_phi %217
OpStore %x_136_phi %218
OpBranch %168
%169 = OpLabel
%219 = OpLoad %int %x_131
OpStore %x_158_phi %219
%220 = OpLoad %int %x_136
OpStore %x_161_phi %220
OpBranch %221
%221 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %222 %223 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %224
%224 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%227 = OpLoad %int %x_158_phi
%228 = OpLoad %int %x_161_phi
%229 = OpSLessThan %bool %228 %int_10
OpSelectionMerge %230 None
OpBranchConditional %229 %231 %230
%231 = OpLabel
%232 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %228 %162
OpBranch %230
%230 = OpLabel
%233 = OpPhi %bool %229 %224 %232 %231
OpSelectionMerge %234 None
OpBranchConditional %233 %235 %236
%235 = OpLabel
OpBranch %234
%236 = OpLabel
OpBranch %222
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%234 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranch %223
%223 = OpLabel
%237 = OpIAdd %int %227 %int_1
OpStore %x_159 %237
%238 = OpIAdd %int %228 %int_1
OpStore %x_162 %238
%239 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %228
%240 = OpLoad %int %239
%241 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %227
OpStore %241 %240
%242 = OpLoad %int %x_159
OpStore %x_158_phi %242
%243 = OpLoad %int %x_162
OpStore %x_161_phi %243
OpBranch %221
%222 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_171_phi %156
OpBranch %244
%244 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %245 %246 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %247
%247 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%249 = OpLoad %int %x_171_phi
%250 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %249 %165
OpSelectionMerge %251 None
OpBranchConditional %250 %252 %253
%252 = OpLabel
OpBranch %251
%253 = OpLabel
OpBranch %245
%251 = OpLabel
OpBranch %246
%246 = OpLabel
%254 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %249
%255 = OpLoad %int %254
%256 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %249
OpStore %256 %255
%257 = OpIAdd %int %249 %int_1
OpStore %x_172 %257
%258 = OpLoad %int %x_172
OpStore %x_171_phi %258
OpBranch %244
%245 = OpLabel
OpBranch %146
%146 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_119_phi %164
OpBranch %144
%145 = OpLabel
OpBranch %134
%134 = OpLabel
%259 = OpIMul %int %int_2 %138
OpStore %x_113 %259
%260 = OpLoad %int %x_113
OpStore %x_112_phi %260
OpBranch %132
%133 = OpLabel
%267 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_float %gl_FragCoord %uint_1
%268 = OpLoad %float %267
%269 = OpConvertFToS %int %268
OpStore %x_181 %269
%270 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%272 = OpSLessThan %bool %270 %int_30
OpSelectionMerge %273 None
OpBranchConditional %272 %274 %275
%274 = OpLabel
%276 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_0
%277 = OpLoad %int %276
%279 = OpConvertSToF %float %277
%281 = OpFMul %float %279 %float_0_100000001
%282 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %281
OpStore %x_190 %282
%283 = OpLoad %float %x_190
OpStore %x_263_phi %283
OpBranch %273
%275 = OpLabel
%287 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%289 = OpSLessThan %bool %287 %int_60
OpSelectionMerge %290 None
OpBranchConditional %289 %291 %292
%291 = OpLabel
%293 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_1
%294 = OpLoad %int %293
%295 = OpConvertSToF %float %294
%296 = OpFMul %float %295 %float_0_100000001
%297 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %296
OpStore %x_199 %297
%298 = OpLoad %float %x_199
OpStore %x_262_phi %298
OpBranch %290
%292 = OpLabel
%302 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%304 = OpSLessThan %bool %302 %int_90
OpSelectionMerge %305 None
OpBranchConditional %304 %306 %307
%306 = OpLabel
%308 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_2
%309 = OpLoad %int %308
%310 = OpConvertSToF %float %309
%311 = OpFMul %float %310 %float_0_100000001
%312 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %311
OpStore %x_208 %312
%313 = OpLoad %float %x_208
OpStore %x_261_phi %313
OpBranch %305
%307 = OpLabel
%314 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%316 = OpSLessThan %bool %314 %int_120
OpSelectionMerge %317 None
OpBranchConditional %316 %318 %319
%318 = OpLabel
%320 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_3
%321 = OpLoad %int %320
%322 = OpConvertSToF %float %321
%323 = OpFMul %float %322 %float_0_100000001
%324 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %323
OpStore %x_217 %324
%325 = OpLoad %float %x_217
OpStore %x_260_phi %325
OpBranch %317
%319 = OpLabel
%329 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%331 = OpSLessThan %bool %329 %int_150
OpSelectionMerge %332 None
OpBranchConditional %331 %333 %334
%333 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpKill
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%334 = OpLabel
%338 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%340 = OpSLessThan %bool %338 %int_180
OpSelectionMerge %341 None
OpBranchConditional %340 %342 %343
%342 = OpLabel
%345 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_5
%346 = OpLoad %int %345
%347 = OpConvertSToF %float %346
%348 = OpFMul %float %347 %float_0_100000001
%349 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %348
OpStore %x_230 %349
%350 = OpLoad %float %x_230
OpStore %x_259_phi %350
OpBranch %341
%343 = OpLabel
%354 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%356 = OpSLessThan %bool %354 %int_210
OpSelectionMerge %357 None
OpBranchConditional %356 %358 %359
%358 = OpLabel
%361 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_6
%362 = OpLoad %int %361
%363 = OpConvertSToF %float %362
%364 = OpFMul %float %363 %float_0_100000001
%365 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %364
OpStore %x_239 %365
%366 = OpLoad %float %x_239
OpStore %x_258_phi %366
OpBranch %357
%359 = OpLabel
%367 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%369 = OpSLessThan %bool %367 %int_240
OpSelectionMerge %370 None
OpBranchConditional %369 %371 %372
%371 = OpLabel
%374 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_7
%375 = OpLoad %int %374
%376 = OpConvertSToF %float %375
%377 = OpFMul %float %376 %float_0_100000001
%378 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %377
OpStore %x_248 %378
%379 = OpLoad %float %x_248
OpStore %x_257_phi %379
OpBranch %370
%372 = OpLabel
%380 = OpLoad %int %x_181
%382 = OpSLessThan %bool %380 %int_270
OpSelectionMerge %383 None
OpBranchConditional %382 %384 %385
%384 = OpLabel
OpBranch %383
%385 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpKill
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%383 = OpLabel
%387 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_8
%388 = OpLoad %int %387
%389 = OpConvertSToF %float %388
%390 = OpFMul %float %389 %float_0_100000001
%391 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %390
OpStore %x_256 %391
%392 = OpLoad %float %x_256
OpStore %x_257_phi %392
OpBranch %370
%370 = OpLabel
%393 = OpLoad %float %x_257_phi
OpStore %x_257 %393
%394 = OpLoad %float %x_257
OpStore %x_258_phi %394
OpBranch %357
%357 = OpLabel
%395 = OpLoad %float %x_258_phi
OpStore %x_258 %395
%396 = OpLoad %float %x_258
OpStore %x_259_phi %396
OpBranch %341
%341 = OpLabel
%397 = OpLoad %float %x_259_phi
OpStore %x_259 %397
OpBranch %332
%332 = OpLabel
%398 = OpLoad %float %x_259
OpStore %x_260_phi %398
OpBranch %317
%317 = OpLabel
%399 = OpLoad %float %x_260_phi
OpStore %x_260 %399
%400 = OpLoad %float %x_260
OpStore %x_261_phi %400
OpBranch %305
%305 = OpLabel
%401 = OpLoad %float %x_261_phi
OpStore %x_261 %401
%402 = OpLoad %float %x_261
OpStore %x_262_phi %402
OpBranch %290
%290 = OpLabel
%403 = OpLoad %float %x_262_phi
OpStore %x_262 %403
%404 = OpLoad %float %x_262
OpStore %x_263_phi %404
OpBranch %273
%273 = OpLabel
%405 = OpLoad %float %x_263_phi
%407 = OpCompositeConstruct %v4float %405 %405 %405 %float_1
OpStore %x_GLF_color %407
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%tint_symbol_3 = OpFunction %void None %408
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%tint_symbol_1 = OpFunctionParameter %main_out
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%412 = OpLabel
%413 = OpCompositeExtract %v4float %tint_symbol_1 0
OpStore %tint_symbol_2 %413
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
%main = OpFunction %void None %15
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%415 = OpLabel
%416 = OpLoad %v4float %tint_symbol
OpStore %gl_FragCoord %416
%417 = OpFunctionCall %void %main_1
%419 = OpLoad %v4float %x_GLF_color
%420 = OpCompositeConstruct %main_out %419
%418 = OpFunctionCall %void %tint_symbol_3 %420
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd