encounter
/
dawn-cmake
mirror of https://github.com/encounter/dawn-cmake.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dawn-cmake/test/vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/spv-stable-mergesort-O-prop.../2.wgsl.expected.spvasm

731 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; SPIR-V
; Version: 1.3
; Generator: Google Tint Compiler; 0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
; Bound: 419
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; Schema: 0
OpCapability Shader
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%164 = OpExtInstImport "GLSL.std.450"
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
OpEntryPoint Fragment %main "main" %tint_symbol %tint_symbol_2
OpExecutionMode %main OriginUpperLeft
OpName %buf0 "buf0"
OpMemberName %buf0 0 "injectionSwitch"
OpName %x_8 "x_8"
OpName %gl_FragCoord "gl_FragCoord"
OpName %x_GLF_color "x_GLF_color"
OpName %tint_symbol "tint_symbol"
OpName %tint_symbol_2 "tint_symbol_2"
OpName %main_1 "main_1"
OpName %temp "temp"
OpName %data "data"
OpName %x_189 "x_189"
OpName %x_261 "x_261"
OpName %x_63_phi "x_63_phi"
OpName %x_102_phi "x_102_phi"
OpName %x_111_phi "x_111_phi"
OpName %x_262_phi "x_262_phi"
OpName %x_99 "x_99"
OpName %x_97 "x_97"
OpName %x_95 "x_95"
OpName %x_93 "x_93"
OpName %x_91 "x_91"
OpName %x_89 "x_89"
OpName %x_87 "x_87"
OpName %x_85 "x_85"
OpName %x_83 "x_83"
OpName %x_81 "x_81"
OpName %x_64_phi "x_64_phi"
OpName %x_103 "x_103"
OpName %x_112 "x_112"
OpName %x_118_phi "x_118_phi"
OpName %x_130 "x_130"
OpName %x_135 "x_135"
OpName %x_130_phi "x_130_phi"
OpName %x_133_phi "x_133_phi"
OpName %x_135_phi "x_135_phi"
OpName %x_157_phi "x_157_phi"
OpName %x_160_phi "x_160_phi"
OpName %x_170_phi "x_170_phi"
OpName %x_150 "x_150"
OpName %x_153 "x_153"
OpName %x_134_phi "x_134_phi"
OpName %x_136_phi "x_136_phi"
OpName %x_158 "x_158"
OpName %x_161 "x_161"
OpName %x_171 "x_171"
OpName %x_180 "x_180"
OpName %x_198 "x_198"
OpName %x_260 "x_260"
OpName %x_261_phi "x_261_phi"
OpName %x_207 "x_207"
OpName %x_259 "x_259"
OpName %x_260_phi "x_260_phi"
OpName %x_216 "x_216"
OpName %x_258 "x_258"
OpName %x_259_phi "x_259_phi"
OpName %x_229 "x_229"
OpName %x_257 "x_257"
OpName %x_258_phi "x_258_phi"
OpName %x_238 "x_238"
OpName %x_256 "x_256"
OpName %x_257_phi "x_257_phi"
OpName %x_247 "x_247"
OpName %x_255 "x_255"
OpName %x_256_phi "x_256_phi"
OpName %main_out "main_out"
OpMemberName %main_out 0 "x_GLF_color_1"
OpName %tint_symbol_3 "tint_symbol_3"
OpName %tint_symbol_1 "tint_symbol_1"
OpName %main "main"
OpDecorate %buf0 Block
OpMemberDecorate %buf0 0 Offset 0
OpDecorate %x_8 NonWritable
OpDecorate %x_8 DescriptorSet 0
OpDecorate %x_8 Binding 0
OpDecorate %tint_symbol BuiltIn FragCoord
OpDecorate %tint_symbol_2 Location 0
OpDecorate %_arr_int_uint_10 ArrayStride 4
OpMemberDecorate %main_out 0 Offset 0
%float = OpTypeFloat 32
%v2float = OpTypeVector %float 2
%buf0 = OpTypeStruct %v2float
%_ptr_Uniform_buf0 = OpTypePointer Uniform %buf0
%x_8 = OpVariable %_ptr_Uniform_buf0 Uniform
%v4float = OpTypeVector %float 4
%_ptr_Private_v4float = OpTypePointer Private %v4float
%9 = OpConstantNull %v4float
%gl_FragCoord = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %9
%x_GLF_color = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %9
%_ptr_Input_v4float = OpTypePointer Input %v4float
%tint_symbol = OpVariable %_ptr_Input_v4float Input
%_ptr_Output_v4float = OpTypePointer Output %v4float
%tint_symbol_2 = OpVariable %_ptr_Output_v4float Output %9
%void = OpTypeVoid
%15 = OpTypeFunction %void
%int = OpTypeInt 32 1
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%uint_10 = OpConstant %uint 10
%_arr_int_uint_10 = OpTypeArray %int %uint_10
%_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_10 = OpTypePointer Function %_arr_int_uint_10
%25 = OpConstantNull %_arr_int_uint_10
%_ptr_Function_float = OpTypePointer Function %float
%29 = OpConstantNull %float
%_ptr_Function_int = OpTypePointer Function %int
%33 = OpConstantNull %int
%uint_0 = OpConstant %uint 0
%_ptr_Uniform_float = OpTypePointer Uniform %float
%int_1 = OpConstant %int 1
%int_n5 = OpConstant %int -5
%int_n4 = OpConstant %int -4
%int_n3 = OpConstant %int -3
%int_n2 = OpConstant %int -2
%int_n1 = OpConstant %int -1
%int_0 = OpConstant %int 0
%int_2 = OpConstant %int 2
%int_3 = OpConstant %int 3
%int_4 = OpConstant %int 4
%int_10 = OpConstant %int 10
%bool = OpTypeBool
%int_9 = OpConstant %int 9
%uint_1 = OpConstant %uint 1
%_ptr_Private_float = OpTypePointer Private %float
%int_30 = OpConstant %int 30
%float_0_5 = OpConstant %float 0.5
%float_0_100000001 = OpConstant %float 0.100000001
%int_60 = OpConstant %int 60
%int_90 = OpConstant %int 90
%int_120 = OpConstant %int 120
%int_150 = OpConstant %int 150
%int_180 = OpConstant %int 180
%int_5 = OpConstant %int 5
%int_210 = OpConstant %int 210
%int_6 = OpConstant %int 6
%int_240 = OpConstant %int 240
%int_7 = OpConstant %int 7
%int_270 = OpConstant %int 270
%int_8 = OpConstant %int 8
%float_1 = OpConstant %float 1
%main_out = OpTypeStruct %v4float
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%406 = OpTypeFunction %void %main_out
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_1 = OpFunction %void None %15
%18 = OpLabel
%temp = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_10 Function %25
%data = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_10 Function %25
%x_189 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_261 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_63_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_102_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_111_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_262_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_99 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_97 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_95 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_93 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_91 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_89 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_87 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_85 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_83 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_81 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_64_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_103 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_112 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_118_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_130 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_135 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_130_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_133_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_135_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_157_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_160_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_170_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_150 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_153 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_134_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_136_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_158 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_161 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_171 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_180 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %33
%x_198 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_260 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_261_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_207 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_259 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_260_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_216 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_258 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_259_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_229 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_257 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_258_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_238 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_256 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_257_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_247 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_255 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%x_256_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%39 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_float %x_8 %uint_0 %uint_0
%40 = OpLoad %float %39
%41 = OpConvertFToS %int %40
OpStore %x_63_phi %41
OpBranch %42
%42 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %43 %44 None
OpBranch %45
%45 = OpLabel
%57 = OpLoad %int %x_63_phi
%59 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_64_phi %59
OpSelectionMerge %60 None
OpSwitch %57 %61 9 %62 8 %63 7 %64 6 %65 5 %66 4 %67 3 %68 2 %69 1 %70 0 %71
%62 = OpLabel
%72 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %72 %int_n5
%74 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_99 %74
%75 = OpLoad %int %x_99
OpStore %x_64_phi %75
OpBranch %60
%63 = OpLabel
%76 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %76 %int_n4
%78 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_97 %78
%79 = OpLoad %int %x_97
OpStore %x_64_phi %79
OpBranch %60
%64 = OpLabel
%80 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %80 %int_n3
%82 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_95 %82
%83 = OpLoad %int %x_95
OpStore %x_64_phi %83
OpBranch %60
%65 = OpLabel
%84 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %84 %int_n2
%86 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_93 %86
%87 = OpLoad %int %x_93
OpStore %x_64_phi %87
OpBranch %60
%66 = OpLabel
%88 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %88 %int_n1
%90 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_91 %90
%91 = OpLoad %int %x_91
OpStore %x_64_phi %91
OpBranch %60
%67 = OpLabel
%92 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %92 %int_0
%94 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_89 %94
%95 = OpLoad %int %x_89
OpStore %x_64_phi %95
OpBranch %60
%68 = OpLabel
%96 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %96 %int_1
%97 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_87 %97
%98 = OpLoad %int %x_87
OpStore %x_64_phi %98
OpBranch %60
%69 = OpLabel
%99 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %99 %int_2
%101 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_85 %101
%102 = OpLoad %int %x_85
OpStore %x_64_phi %102
OpBranch %60
%70 = OpLabel
%103 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %103 %int_3
%105 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_83 %105
%106 = OpLoad %int %x_83
OpStore %x_64_phi %106
OpBranch %60
%71 = OpLabel
%107 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %57
OpStore %107 %int_4
%109 = OpIAdd %int %57 %int_1
OpStore %x_81 %109
%110 = OpLoad %int %x_81
OpStore %x_64_phi %110
OpBranch %60
%61 = OpLabel
OpBranch %60
%60 = OpLabel
%111 = OpLoad %int %x_64_phi
OpBranch %44
%44 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_63_phi %111
%113 = OpSLessThan %bool %111 %int_10
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranchConditional %113 %42 %43
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%43 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_102_phi %int_0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranch %115
%115 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %116 %117 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %118
%118 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%120 = OpLoad %int %x_102_phi
%121 = OpSLessThan %bool %120 %int_10
OpSelectionMerge %122 None
OpBranchConditional %121 %123 %124
%123 = OpLabel
OpBranch %122
%124 = OpLabel
OpBranch %116
%122 = OpLabel
OpBranch %117
%117 = OpLabel
%125 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %120
%126 = OpLoad %int %125
%127 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %120
OpStore %127 %126
%128 = OpIAdd %int %120 %int_1
OpStore %x_103 %128
%129 = OpLoad %int %x_103
OpStore %x_102_phi %129
OpBranch %115
%116 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpStore %x_111_phi %int_1
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranch %130
%130 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %131 %132 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %133
%133 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%136 = OpLoad %int %x_111_phi
%138 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %136 %int_9
OpSelectionMerge %139 None
OpBranchConditional %138 %140 %141
%140 = OpLabel
OpBranch %139
%141 = OpLabel
OpBranch %131
%139 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_118_phi %int_0
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %142
%142 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpLoopMerge %143 %144 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %145
%145 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%154 = OpLoad %int %x_118_phi
%155 = OpSLessThan %bool %154 %int_9
OpSelectionMerge %156 None
OpBranchConditional %155 %157 %158
%157 = OpLabel
OpBranch %156
%158 = OpLabel
OpBranch %143
%156 = OpLabel
%159 = OpIAdd %int %154 %136
%160 = OpISub %int %159 %int_1
%161 = OpIMul %int %int_2 %136
%162 = OpIAdd %int %154 %161
%165 = OpISub %int %162 %int_1
%163 = OpExtInst %int %164 SMin %165 %int_9
OpStore %x_130_phi %154
OpStore %x_133_phi %159
OpStore %x_135_phi %154
OpBranch %166
%166 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %167 %168 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %169
%169 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%174 = OpLoad %int %x_130_phi
OpStore %x_130 %174
%175 = OpLoad %int %x_133_phi
%176 = OpLoad %int %x_135_phi
OpStore %x_135 %176
%177 = OpLoad %int %x_135
%178 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %177 %160
OpSelectionMerge %179 None
OpBranchConditional %178 %180 %179
%180 = OpLabel
%181 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %175 %163
OpBranch %179
%179 = OpLabel
%182 = OpPhi %bool %178 %169 %181 %180
OpSelectionMerge %183 None
OpBranchConditional %182 %184 %185
%184 = OpLabel
OpBranch %183
%185 = OpLabel
OpBranch %167
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%183 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%186 = OpLoad %int %x_135
%187 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %186
%188 = OpLoad %int %187
%189 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %175
%190 = OpLoad %int %189
%192 = OpLoad %int %x_130
%193 = OpCopyObject %int %int_1
%194 = OpIAdd %int %192 %193
%191 = OpCopyObject %int %194
%195 = OpSLessThan %bool %188 %190
OpSelectionMerge %196 None
OpBranchConditional %195 %197 %198
%197 = OpLabel
%200 = OpLoad %int %x_135
%201 = OpCopyObject %int %int_1
%202 = OpIAdd %int %200 %201
%199 = OpCopyObject %int %202
OpStore %x_150 %199
%203 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %186
%204 = OpLoad %int %203
%205 = OpLoad %int %x_130
%206 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %205
OpStore %206 %204
OpStore %x_134_phi %175
%207 = OpLoad %int %x_150
OpStore %x_136_phi %207
OpBranch %196
%198 = OpLabel
%208 = OpIAdd %int %175 %int_1
OpStore %x_153 %208
%209 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %175
%210 = OpLoad %int %209
%211 = OpLoad %int %x_130
%212 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %211
OpStore %212 %210
%213 = OpLoad %int %x_153
OpStore %x_134_phi %213
%214 = OpLoad %int %x_135
OpStore %x_136_phi %214
OpBranch %196
%196 = OpLabel
%215 = OpLoad %int %x_134_phi
%216 = OpLoad %int %x_136_phi
OpBranch %168
%168 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_130_phi %191
OpStore %x_133_phi %215
OpStore %x_135_phi %216
OpBranch %166
%167 = OpLabel
%217 = OpLoad %int %x_130
OpStore %x_157_phi %217
%218 = OpLoad %int %x_135
OpStore %x_160_phi %218
OpBranch %219
%219 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %220 %221 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %222
%222 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%225 = OpLoad %int %x_157_phi
%226 = OpLoad %int %x_160_phi
%227 = OpSLessThan %bool %226 %int_10
OpSelectionMerge %228 None
OpBranchConditional %227 %229 %228
%229 = OpLabel
%230 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %226 %160
OpBranch %228
%228 = OpLabel
%231 = OpPhi %bool %227 %222 %230 %229
OpSelectionMerge %232 None
OpBranchConditional %231 %233 %234
%233 = OpLabel
OpBranch %232
%234 = OpLabel
OpBranch %220
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%232 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranch %221
%221 = OpLabel
%235 = OpIAdd %int %225 %int_1
OpStore %x_158 %235
%236 = OpIAdd %int %226 %int_1
OpStore %x_161 %236
%237 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %226
%238 = OpLoad %int %237
%239 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %225
OpStore %239 %238
%240 = OpLoad %int %x_158
OpStore %x_157_phi %240
%241 = OpLoad %int %x_161
OpStore %x_160_phi %241
OpBranch %219
%220 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_170_phi %154
OpBranch %242
%242 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %243 %244 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %245
%245 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%247 = OpLoad %int %x_170_phi
%248 = OpSLessThanEqual %bool %247 %163
OpSelectionMerge %249 None
OpBranchConditional %248 %250 %251
%250 = OpLabel
OpBranch %249
%251 = OpLabel
OpBranch %243
%249 = OpLabel
OpBranch %244
%244 = OpLabel
%252 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %temp %247
%253 = OpLoad %int %252
%254 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %247
OpStore %254 %253
%255 = OpIAdd %int %247 %int_1
OpStore %x_171 %255
%256 = OpLoad %int %x_171
OpStore %x_170_phi %256
OpBranch %242
%243 = OpLabel
OpBranch %144
%144 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_118_phi %162
OpBranch %142
%143 = OpLabel
OpBranch %132
%132 = OpLabel
%257 = OpIMul %int %int_2 %136
OpStore %x_112 %257
%258 = OpLoad %int %x_112
OpStore %x_111_phi %258
OpBranch %130
%131 = OpLabel
%265 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_float %gl_FragCoord %uint_1
%266 = OpLoad %float %265
%267 = OpConvertFToS %int %266
OpStore %x_180 %267
%268 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%270 = OpSLessThan %bool %268 %int_30
OpSelectionMerge %271 None
OpBranchConditional %270 %272 %273
%272 = OpLabel
%274 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_0
%275 = OpLoad %int %274
%277 = OpConvertSToF %float %275
%279 = OpFMul %float %277 %float_0_100000001
%280 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %279
OpStore %x_189 %280
%281 = OpLoad %float %x_189
OpStore %x_262_phi %281
OpBranch %271
%273 = OpLabel
%285 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%287 = OpSLessThan %bool %285 %int_60
OpSelectionMerge %288 None
OpBranchConditional %287 %289 %290
%289 = OpLabel
%291 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_1
%292 = OpLoad %int %291
%293 = OpConvertSToF %float %292
%294 = OpFMul %float %293 %float_0_100000001
%295 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %294
OpStore %x_198 %295
%296 = OpLoad %float %x_198
OpStore %x_261_phi %296
OpBranch %288
%290 = OpLabel
%300 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%302 = OpSLessThan %bool %300 %int_90
OpSelectionMerge %303 None
OpBranchConditional %302 %304 %305
%304 = OpLabel
%306 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_2
%307 = OpLoad %int %306
%308 = OpConvertSToF %float %307
%309 = OpFMul %float %308 %float_0_100000001
%310 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %309
OpStore %x_207 %310
%311 = OpLoad %float %x_207
OpStore %x_260_phi %311
OpBranch %303
%305 = OpLabel
%312 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%314 = OpSLessThan %bool %312 %int_120
OpSelectionMerge %315 None
OpBranchConditional %314 %316 %317
%316 = OpLabel
%318 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_3
%319 = OpLoad %int %318
%320 = OpConvertSToF %float %319
%321 = OpFMul %float %320 %float_0_100000001
%322 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %321
OpStore %x_216 %322
%323 = OpLoad %float %x_216
OpStore %x_259_phi %323
OpBranch %315
%317 = OpLabel
%327 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%329 = OpSLessThan %bool %327 %int_150
OpSelectionMerge %330 None
OpBranchConditional %329 %331 %332
%331 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpKill
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%332 = OpLabel
%336 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%338 = OpSLessThan %bool %336 %int_180
OpSelectionMerge %339 None
OpBranchConditional %338 %340 %341
%340 = OpLabel
%343 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_5
%344 = OpLoad %int %343
%345 = OpConvertSToF %float %344
%346 = OpFMul %float %345 %float_0_100000001
%347 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %346
OpStore %x_229 %347
%348 = OpLoad %float %x_229
OpStore %x_258_phi %348
OpBranch %339
%341 = OpLabel
%352 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%354 = OpSLessThan %bool %352 %int_210
OpSelectionMerge %355 None
OpBranchConditional %354 %356 %357
%356 = OpLabel
%359 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_6
%360 = OpLoad %int %359
%361 = OpConvertSToF %float %360
%362 = OpFMul %float %361 %float_0_100000001
%363 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %362
OpStore %x_238 %363
%364 = OpLoad %float %x_238
OpStore %x_257_phi %364
OpBranch %355
%357 = OpLabel
%365 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%367 = OpSLessThan %bool %365 %int_240
OpSelectionMerge %368 None
OpBranchConditional %367 %369 %370
%369 = OpLabel
%372 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_7
%373 = OpLoad %int %372
%374 = OpConvertSToF %float %373
%375 = OpFMul %float %374 %float_0_100000001
%376 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %375
OpStore %x_247 %376
%377 = OpLoad %float %x_247
OpStore %x_256_phi %377
OpBranch %368
%370 = OpLabel
%378 = OpLoad %int %x_180
%380 = OpSLessThan %bool %378 %int_270
OpSelectionMerge %381 None
OpBranchConditional %380 %382 %383
%382 = OpLabel
OpBranch %381
%383 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpKill
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%381 = OpLabel
%385 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %data %int_8
%386 = OpLoad %int %385
%387 = OpConvertSToF %float %386
%388 = OpFMul %float %387 %float_0_100000001
%389 = OpFAdd %float %float_0_5 %388
OpStore %x_255 %389
%390 = OpLoad %float %x_255
OpStore %x_256_phi %390
OpBranch %368
%368 = OpLabel
%391 = OpLoad %float %x_256_phi
OpStore %x_256 %391
%392 = OpLoad %float %x_256
OpStore %x_257_phi %392
OpBranch %355
%355 = OpLabel
%393 = OpLoad %float %x_257_phi
OpStore %x_257 %393
%394 = OpLoad %float %x_257
OpStore %x_258_phi %394
OpBranch %339
%339 = OpLabel
%395 = OpLoad %float %x_258_phi
OpStore %x_258 %395
OpBranch %330
%330 = OpLabel
%396 = OpLoad %float %x_258
OpStore %x_259_phi %396
OpBranch %315
%315 = OpLabel
%397 = OpLoad %float %x_259_phi
OpStore %x_259 %397
%398 = OpLoad %float %x_259
OpStore %x_260_phi %398
OpBranch %303
%303 = OpLabel
%399 = OpLoad %float %x_260_phi
OpStore %x_260 %399
%400 = OpLoad %float %x_260
OpStore %x_261_phi %400
OpBranch %288
%288 = OpLabel
%401 = OpLoad %float %x_261_phi
OpStore %x_261 %401
%402 = OpLoad %float %x_261
OpStore %x_262_phi %402
OpBranch %271
%271 = OpLabel
%403 = OpLoad %float %x_262_phi
%405 = OpCompositeConstruct %v4float %403 %403 %403 %float_1
OpStore %x_GLF_color %405
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%tint_symbol_3 = OpFunction %void None %406
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%tint_symbol_1 = OpFunctionParameter %main_out
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%410 = OpLabel
%411 = OpCompositeExtract %v4float %tint_symbol_1 0
OpStore %tint_symbol_2 %411
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
%main = OpFunction %void None %15
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%413 = OpLabel
%414 = OpLoad %v4float %tint_symbol
OpStore %gl_FragCoord %414
%415 = OpFunctionCall %void %main_1
%417 = OpLoad %v4float %x_GLF_color
%418 = OpCompositeConstruct %main_out %417
%416 = OpFunctionCall %void %tint_symbol_3 %418
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd