encounter
/
dawn-cmake
mirror of https://github.com/encounter/dawn-cmake.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dawn-cmake/test/vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/cov-nested-loops-global-loo.../0-opt.wgsl.expected.spvasm

612 lines
22 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; SPIR-V
; Version: 1.3
; Generator: Google Tint Compiler; 0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
; Bound: 355
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; Schema: 0
OpCapability Shader
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
OpEntryPoint Fragment %main "main" %tint_symbol_1
OpExecutionMode %main OriginUpperLeft
OpName %x_GLF_global_loop_count "x_GLF_global_loop_count"
OpName %buf0 "buf0"
OpMemberName %buf0 0 "x_GLF_uniform_float_values"
OpName %x_7 "x_7"
OpName %buf1 "buf1"
OpMemberName %buf1 0 "x_GLF_uniform_int_values"
OpName %x_10 "x_10"
OpName %x_GLF_color "x_GLF_color"
OpName %tint_symbol_1 "tint_symbol_1"
OpName %main_1 "main_1"
OpName %f "f"
OpName %i "i"
OpName %i_1 "i_1"
OpName %i_2 "i_2"
OpName %i_3 "i_3"
OpName %i_4 "i_4"
OpName %i_5 "i_5"
OpName %i_6 "i_6"
OpName %i_7 "i_7"
OpName %i_8 "i_8"
OpName %i_9 "i_9"
OpName %i_10 "i_10"
OpName %i_11 "i_11"
OpName %i_12 "i_12"
OpName %i_13 "i_13"
OpName %i_14 "i_14"
OpName %sum "sum"
OpName %r "r"
OpName %main_out "main_out"
OpMemberName %main_out 0 "x_GLF_color_1"
OpName %tint_symbol_2 "tint_symbol_2"
OpName %tint_symbol "tint_symbol"
OpName %main "main"
OpDecorate %buf0 Block
OpMemberDecorate %buf0 0 Offset 0
OpDecorate %_arr_float_uint_3 ArrayStride 16
OpDecorate %x_7 NonWritable
OpDecorate %x_7 DescriptorSet 0
OpDecorate %x_7 Binding 0
OpDecorate %buf1 Block
OpMemberDecorate %buf1 0 Offset 0
OpDecorate %_arr_int_uint_4 ArrayStride 16
OpDecorate %x_10 NonWritable
OpDecorate %x_10 DescriptorSet 0
OpDecorate %x_10 Binding 1
OpDecorate %tint_symbol_1 Location 0
OpMemberDecorate %main_out 0 Offset 0
%int = OpTypeInt 32 1
%_ptr_Private_int = OpTypePointer Private %int
%4 = OpConstantNull %int
%x_GLF_global_loop_count = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_int Private %4
%float = OpTypeFloat 32
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%uint_3 = OpConstant %uint 3
%_arr_float_uint_3 = OpTypeArray %float %uint_3
%buf0 = OpTypeStruct %_arr_float_uint_3
%_ptr_Uniform_buf0 = OpTypePointer Uniform %buf0
%x_7 = OpVariable %_ptr_Uniform_buf0 Uniform
%uint_4 = OpConstant %uint 4
%_arr_int_uint_4 = OpTypeArray %int %uint_4
%buf1 = OpTypeStruct %_arr_int_uint_4
%_ptr_Uniform_buf1 = OpTypePointer Uniform %buf1
%x_10 = OpVariable %_ptr_Uniform_buf1 Uniform
%v4float = OpTypeVector %float 4
%_ptr_Private_v4float = OpTypePointer Private %v4float
%20 = OpConstantNull %v4float
%x_GLF_color = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %20
%_ptr_Output_v4float = OpTypePointer Output %v4float
%tint_symbol_1 = OpVariable %_ptr_Output_v4float Output %20
%void = OpTypeVoid
%23 = OpTypeFunction %void
%_ptr_Function_float = OpTypePointer Function %float
%29 = OpConstantNull %float
%_ptr_Function_int = OpTypePointer Function %int
%int_0 = OpConstant %int 0
%uint_0 = OpConstant %uint 0
%int_1 = OpConstant %int 1
%_ptr_Uniform_float = OpTypePointer Uniform %float
%_ptr_Uniform_int = OpTypePointer Uniform %int
%bool = OpTypeBool
%int_2 = OpConstant %int 2
%int_3 = OpConstant %int 3
%int_100 = OpConstant %int 100
%main_out = OpTypeStruct %v4float
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%343 = OpTypeFunction %void %main_out
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_1 = OpFunction %void None %23
%26 = OpLabel
%f = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%i = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_1 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_2 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_3 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_4 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_5 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_6 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_7 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_8 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_9 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_10 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_11 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_12 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_13 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%i_14 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
%sum = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_float Function %29
%r = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %4
OpStore %x_GLF_global_loop_count %int_0
%52 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_float %x_7 %uint_0 %int_1
%53 = OpLoad %float %52
OpStore %f %53
%55 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%56 = OpLoad %int %55
OpStore %i %56
OpBranch %57
%57 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %58 %59 None
OpBranch %60
%60 = OpLabel
%61 = OpLoad %int %i
%62 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%63 = OpLoad %int %62
%64 = OpSLessThan %bool %61 %63
OpSelectionMerge %66 None
OpBranchConditional %64 %67 %68
%67 = OpLabel
OpBranch %66
%68 = OpLabel
OpBranch %58
%66 = OpLabel
%69 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%70 = OpLoad %int %69
OpStore %i_1 %70
OpBranch %71
%71 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %72 %73 None
OpBranch %74
%74 = OpLabel
%75 = OpLoad %int %i_1
%76 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%77 = OpLoad %int %76
%78 = OpSLessThan %bool %75 %77
OpSelectionMerge %79 None
OpBranchConditional %78 %80 %81
%80 = OpLabel
OpBranch %79
%81 = OpLabel
OpBranch %72
%79 = OpLabel
%82 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%83 = OpLoad %int %82
OpStore %i_2 %83
OpBranch %84
%84 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %85 %86 None
OpBranch %87
%87 = OpLabel
%88 = OpLoad %int %i_2
%89 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%90 = OpLoad %int %89
%91 = OpSLessThan %bool %88 %90
OpSelectionMerge %92 None
OpBranchConditional %91 %93 %94
%93 = OpLabel
OpBranch %92
%94 = OpLabel
OpBranch %85
%92 = OpLabel
%95 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%96 = OpLoad %int %95
OpStore %i_3 %96
OpBranch %97
%97 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %98 %99 None
OpBranch %100
%100 = OpLabel
%101 = OpLoad %int %i_3
%102 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%103 = OpLoad %int %102
%104 = OpSLessThan %bool %101 %103
OpSelectionMerge %105 None
OpBranchConditional %104 %106 %107
%106 = OpLabel
OpBranch %105
%107 = OpLabel
OpBranch %98
%105 = OpLabel
%108 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%109 = OpLoad %int %108
OpStore %i_4 %109
OpBranch %110
%110 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %111 %112 None
OpBranch %113
%113 = OpLabel
%114 = OpLoad %int %i_4
%115 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%116 = OpLoad %int %115
%117 = OpSLessThan %bool %114 %116
OpSelectionMerge %118 None
OpBranchConditional %117 %119 %120
%119 = OpLabel
OpBranch %118
%120 = OpLabel
OpBranch %111
%118 = OpLabel
%121 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%122 = OpLoad %int %121
OpStore %i_5 %122
OpBranch %123
%123 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %124 %125 None
OpBranch %126
%126 = OpLabel
%127 = OpLoad %int %i_5
%128 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%129 = OpLoad %int %128
%130 = OpSLessThan %bool %127 %129
OpSelectionMerge %131 None
OpBranchConditional %130 %132 %133
%132 = OpLabel
OpBranch %131
%133 = OpLabel
OpBranch %124
%131 = OpLabel
%134 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%135 = OpLoad %int %134
OpStore %i_6 %135
OpBranch %136
%136 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %137 %138 None
OpBranch %139
%139 = OpLabel
%140 = OpLoad %int %i_6
%141 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%142 = OpLoad %int %141
%143 = OpSLessThan %bool %140 %142
OpSelectionMerge %144 None
OpBranchConditional %143 %145 %146
%145 = OpLabel
OpBranch %144
%146 = OpLabel
OpBranch %137
%144 = OpLabel
%147 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%148 = OpLoad %int %147
OpStore %i_7 %148
OpBranch %149
%149 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %150 %151 None
OpBranch %152
%152 = OpLabel
%153 = OpLoad %int %i_7
%154 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%155 = OpLoad %int %154
%156 = OpSLessThan %bool %153 %155
OpSelectionMerge %157 None
OpBranchConditional %156 %158 %159
%158 = OpLabel
OpBranch %157
%159 = OpLabel
OpBranch %150
%157 = OpLabel
%160 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%161 = OpLoad %int %160
OpStore %i_8 %161
OpBranch %162
%162 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %163 %164 None
OpBranch %165
%165 = OpLabel
%166 = OpLoad %int %i_8
%167 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%168 = OpLoad %int %167
%169 = OpSLessThan %bool %166 %168
OpSelectionMerge %170 None
OpBranchConditional %169 %171 %172
%171 = OpLabel
OpBranch %170
%172 = OpLabel
OpBranch %163
%170 = OpLabel
%173 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%174 = OpLoad %int %173
OpStore %i_9 %174
OpBranch %175
%175 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %176 %177 None
OpBranch %178
%178 = OpLabel
%179 = OpLoad %int %i_9
%180 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%181 = OpLoad %int %180
%182 = OpSLessThan %bool %179 %181
OpSelectionMerge %183 None
OpBranchConditional %182 %184 %185
%184 = OpLabel
OpBranch %183
%185 = OpLabel
OpBranch %176
%183 = OpLabel
%186 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%187 = OpLoad %int %186
OpStore %i_10 %187
OpBranch %188
%188 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %189 %190 None
OpBranch %191
%191 = OpLabel
%192 = OpLoad %int %i_10
%193 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%194 = OpLoad %int %193
%195 = OpSLessThan %bool %192 %194
OpSelectionMerge %196 None
OpBranchConditional %195 %197 %198
%197 = OpLabel
OpBranch %196
%198 = OpLabel
OpBranch %189
%196 = OpLabel
%199 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%200 = OpLoad %int %199
OpStore %i_11 %200
OpBranch %201
%201 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %202 %203 None
OpBranch %204
%204 = OpLabel
%205 = OpLoad %int %i_11
%207 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_2
%208 = OpLoad %int %207
%209 = OpSLessThan %bool %205 %208
OpSelectionMerge %210 None
OpBranchConditional %209 %211 %212
%211 = OpLabel
OpBranch %210
%212 = OpLabel
OpBranch %202
%210 = OpLabel
%213 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%214 = OpLoad %int %213
OpStore %i_12 %214
OpBranch %215
%215 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %216 %217 None
OpBranch %218
%218 = OpLabel
%219 = OpLoad %int %i_12
%220 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%221 = OpLoad %int %220
%222 = OpSLessThan %bool %219 %221
OpSelectionMerge %223 None
OpBranchConditional %222 %224 %225
%224 = OpLabel
OpBranch %223
%225 = OpLabel
OpBranch %216
%223 = OpLabel
%226 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%227 = OpLoad %int %226
OpStore %i_13 %227
OpBranch %228
%228 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %229 %230 None
OpBranch %231
%231 = OpLabel
%232 = OpLoad %int %i_13
%233 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%234 = OpLoad %int %233
%235 = OpSLessThan %bool %232 %234
OpSelectionMerge %236 None
OpBranchConditional %235 %237 %238
%237 = OpLabel
OpBranch %236
%238 = OpLabel
OpBranch %229
%236 = OpLabel
%239 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%240 = OpLoad %int %239
OpStore %i_14 %240
OpBranch %241
%241 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %242 %243 None
OpBranch %244
%244 = OpLabel
%245 = OpLoad %int %i_14
%246 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_2
%247 = OpLoad %int %246
%248 = OpSLessThan %bool %245 %247
OpSelectionMerge %249 None
OpBranchConditional %248 %250 %251
%250 = OpLabel
OpBranch %249
%251 = OpLabel
OpBranch %242
%249 = OpLabel
OpBranch %252
%252 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %253 %254 None
OpBranch %255
%255 = OpLabel
%256 = OpLoad %int %x_GLF_global_loop_count
%257 = OpIAdd %int %256 %int_1
OpStore %x_GLF_global_loop_count %257
OpBranch %254
%254 = OpLabel
%258 = OpLoad %int %x_GLF_global_loop_count
%260 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_3
%261 = OpLoad %int %260
%263 = OpISub %int %int_100 %261
%264 = OpSLessThan %bool %258 %263
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranchConditional %264 %252 %253
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%253 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%265 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_float %x_7 %uint_0 %int_0
%266 = OpLoad %float %265
%267 = OpLoad %float %f
%268 = OpFAdd %float %267 %266
OpStore %f %268
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %243
%243 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%269 = OpLoad %int %i_14
%270 = OpIAdd %int %269 %int_1
OpStore %i_14 %270
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %241
%242 = OpLabel
OpBranch %230
%230 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%271 = OpLoad %int %i_13
%272 = OpIAdd %int %271 %int_1
OpStore %i_13 %272
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %228
%229 = OpLabel
OpBranch %217
%217 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%273 = OpLoad %int %i_12
%274 = OpIAdd %int %273 %int_1
OpStore %i_12 %274
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %215
%216 = OpLabel
OpBranch %203
%203 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%275 = OpLoad %int %i_11
%276 = OpIAdd %int %275 %int_1
OpStore %i_11 %276
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %201
%202 = OpLabel
OpBranch %190
%190 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%277 = OpLoad %int %i_10
%278 = OpIAdd %int %277 %int_1
OpStore %i_10 %278
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %188
%189 = OpLabel
OpBranch %177
%177 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%279 = OpLoad %int %i_9
%280 = OpIAdd %int %279 %int_1
OpStore %i_9 %280
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %175
%176 = OpLabel
OpBranch %164
%164 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%281 = OpLoad %int %i_8
%282 = OpIAdd %int %281 %int_1
OpStore %i_8 %282
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %162
%163 = OpLabel
OpBranch %151
%151 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%283 = OpLoad %int %i_7
%284 = OpIAdd %int %283 %int_1
OpStore %i_7 %284
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %149
%150 = OpLabel
OpBranch %138
%138 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%285 = OpLoad %int %i_6
%286 = OpIAdd %int %285 %int_1
OpStore %i_6 %286
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %136
%137 = OpLabel
OpBranch %125
%125 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%287 = OpLoad %int %i_5
%288 = OpIAdd %int %287 %int_1
OpStore %i_5 %288
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %123
%124 = OpLabel
OpBranch %112
%112 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%289 = OpLoad %int %i_4
%290 = OpIAdd %int %289 %int_1
OpStore %i_4 %290
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %110
%111 = OpLabel
OpBranch %99
%99 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%291 = OpLoad %int %i_3
%292 = OpIAdd %int %291 %int_1
OpStore %i_3 %292
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %97
%98 = OpLabel
OpBranch %86
%86 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%293 = OpLoad %int %i_2
%294 = OpIAdd %int %293 %int_1
OpStore %i_2 %294
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %84
%85 = OpLabel
OpBranch %73
%73 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%295 = OpLoad %int %i_1
%296 = OpIAdd %int %295 %int_1
OpStore %i_1 %296
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %71
%72 = OpLabel
OpBranch %59
%59 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%297 = OpLoad %int %i
%298 = OpIAdd %int %297 %int_1
OpStore %i %298
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %57
%58 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%299 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_float %x_7 %uint_0 %int_1
%300 = OpLoad %float %299
OpStore %sum %300
%301 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%302 = OpLoad %int %301
OpStore %r %302
OpBranch %303
%303 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %304 %305 None
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %306
%306 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%307 = OpLoad %int %x_GLF_global_loop_count
%308 = OpSLessThan %bool %307 %int_100
OpSelectionMerge %309 None
OpBranchConditional %308 %310 %311
%310 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpBranch %309
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%311 = OpLabel
OpBranch %304
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%309 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%312 = OpLoad %int %x_GLF_global_loop_count
%313 = OpIAdd %int %312 %int_1
OpStore %x_GLF_global_loop_count %313
%314 = OpLoad %float %f
%315 = OpLoad %float %sum
%316 = OpFAdd %float %315 %314
OpStore %sum %316
OpBranch %305
%305 = OpLabel
%317 = OpLoad %int %r
%318 = OpIAdd %int %317 %int_1
OpStore %r %318
OpBranch %303
%304 = OpLabel
%319 = OpLoad %float %sum
%320 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_float %x_7 %uint_0 %int_2
%321 = OpLoad %float %320
%322 = OpFOrdEqual %bool %319 %321
OpSelectionMerge %323 None
OpBranchConditional %322 %324 %325
%324 = OpLabel
%326 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%327 = OpLoad %int %326
%328 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%329 = OpLoad %int %328
%330 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%331 = OpLoad %int %330
%332 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_0
%333 = OpLoad %int %332
%334 = OpConvertSToF %float %327
%335 = OpConvertSToF %float %329
%336 = OpConvertSToF %float %331
%337 = OpConvertSToF %float %333
%338 = OpCompositeConstruct %v4float %334 %335 %336 %337
OpStore %x_GLF_color %338
OpBranch %323
%325 = OpLabel
%339 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_int %x_10 %uint_0 %int_1
%340 = OpLoad %int %339
%341 = OpConvertSToF %float %340
%342 = OpCompositeConstruct %v4float %341 %341 %341 %341
OpStore %x_GLF_color %342
OpBranch %323
%323 = OpLabel
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%tint_symbol_2 = OpFunction %void None %343
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%tint_symbol = OpFunctionParameter %main_out
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%347 = OpLabel
%348 = OpCompositeExtract %v4float %tint_symbol 0
OpStore %tint_symbol_1 %348
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
%main = OpFunction %void None %23
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%350 = OpLabel
%351 = OpFunctionCall %void %main_1
%353 = OpLoad %v4float %x_GLF_color
%354 = OpCompositeConstruct %main_out %353
%352 = OpFunctionCall %void %tint_symbol_2 %354
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd