encounter
/
dawn-cmake
mirror of https://github.com/encounter/dawn-cmake.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dawn-cmake/test/vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/spv-dead-break-and-unroll/1.wgsl.expected.spvasm

780 lines
30 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; SPIR-V
; Version: 1.3
; Generator: Google Tint Compiler; 0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
; Bound: 517
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; Schema: 0
OpCapability Shader
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
OpEntryPoint Fragment %main "main" %tint_symbol %tint_symbol_2
OpExecutionMode %main OriginUpperLeft
OpName %gl_FragCoord "gl_FragCoord"
OpName %buf0 "buf0"
OpMemberName %buf0 0 "resolution"
OpName %x_7 "x_7"
OpName %map "map"
OpName %x_GLF_color "x_GLF_color"
OpName %x_60 "x_60"
OpName %tint_symbol "tint_symbol"
OpName %tint_symbol_2 "tint_symbol_2"
OpName %main_1 "main_1"
OpName %pos "pos"
OpName %ipos "ipos"
OpName %i "i"
OpName %p "p"
OpName %canwalk "canwalk"
OpName %v "v"
OpName %directions "directions"
OpName %j "j"
OpName %d "d"
OpName %x_110 "x_110"
OpName %x_130 "x_130"
OpName %x_150 "x_150"
OpName %x_171 "x_171"
OpName %x_111_phi "x_111_phi"
OpName %x_131_phi "x_131_phi"
OpName %x_151_phi "x_151_phi"
OpName %x_172_phi "x_172_phi"
OpName %x_237 "x_237"
OpName %x_250 "x_250"
OpName %x_289 "x_289"
OpName %x_302 "x_302"
OpName %x_341 "x_341"
OpName %x_354 "x_354"
OpName %x_393 "x_393"
OpName %x_406 "x_406"
OpName %x_238_phi "x_238_phi"
OpName %x_251_phi "x_251_phi"
OpName %x_290_phi "x_290_phi"
OpName %x_303_phi "x_303_phi"
OpName %x_342_phi "x_342_phi"
OpName %x_355_phi "x_355_phi"
OpName %x_394_phi "x_394_phi"
OpName %x_407_phi "x_407_phi"
OpName %main_out "main_out"
OpMemberName %main_out 0 "x_GLF_color_1"
OpName %tint_symbol_3 "tint_symbol_3"
OpName %tint_symbol_1 "tint_symbol_1"
OpName %main "main"
OpDecorate %buf0 Block
OpMemberDecorate %buf0 0 Offset 0
OpDecorate %x_7 NonWritable
OpDecorate %x_7 DescriptorSet 0
OpDecorate %x_7 Binding 0
OpDecorate %_arr_int_uint_256 ArrayStride 4
OpDecorate %tint_symbol BuiltIn FragCoord
OpDecorate %tint_symbol_2 Location 0
OpMemberDecorate %main_out 0 Offset 0
%float = OpTypeFloat 32
%v4float = OpTypeVector %float 4
%_ptr_Private_v4float = OpTypePointer Private %v4float
%5 = OpConstantNull %v4float
%gl_FragCoord = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %5
%v2float = OpTypeVector %float 2
%buf0 = OpTypeStruct %v2float
%_ptr_Uniform_buf0 = OpTypePointer Uniform %buf0
%x_7 = OpVariable %_ptr_Uniform_buf0 Uniform
%int = OpTypeInt 32 1
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%uint_256 = OpConstant %uint 256
%_arr_int_uint_256 = OpTypeArray %int %uint_256
%_ptr_Private__arr_int_uint_256 = OpTypePointer Private %_arr_int_uint_256
%16 = OpConstantNull %_arr_int_uint_256
%map = OpVariable %_ptr_Private__arr_int_uint_256 Private %16
%x_GLF_color = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %5
%mat2v4float = OpTypeMatrix %v4float 2
%float_0 = OpConstant %float 0
%20 = OpConstantComposite %v4float %float_0 %float_0 %float_0 %float_0
%21 = OpConstantComposite %mat2v4float %20 %20
%_ptr_Private_mat2v4float = OpTypePointer Private %mat2v4float
%x_60 = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_mat2v4float Private %21
%_ptr_Input_v4float = OpTypePointer Input %v4float
%tint_symbol = OpVariable %_ptr_Input_v4float Input
%_ptr_Output_v4float = OpTypePointer Output %v4float
%tint_symbol_2 = OpVariable %_ptr_Output_v4float Output %5
%void = OpTypeVoid
%28 = OpTypeFunction %void
%_ptr_Function_v2float = OpTypePointer Function %v2float
%34 = OpConstantNull %v2float
%v2int = OpTypeVector %int 2
%_ptr_Function_v2int = OpTypePointer Function %v2int
%38 = OpConstantNull %v2int
%_ptr_Function_int = OpTypePointer Function %int
%41 = OpConstantNull %int
%bool = OpTypeBool
%_ptr_Function_bool = OpTypePointer Function %bool
%46 = OpConstantNull %bool
%uint_0 = OpConstant %uint 0
%_ptr_Uniform_v2float = OpTypePointer Uniform %v2float
%int_256 = OpConstant %int 256
%int_14 = OpConstant %int 14
%_ptr_Function_float = OpTypePointer Function %float
%uint_1 = OpConstant %uint 1
%float_16 = OpConstant %float 16
%int_0 = OpConstant %int 0
%_ptr_Private_int = OpTypePointer Private %int
%int_1 = OpConstant %int 1
%92 = OpConstantComposite %v2int %int_0 %int_0
%true = OpConstantTrue %bool
%int_2 = OpConstant %int 2
%int_16 = OpConstant %int 16
%false = OpConstantFalse %bool
%int_8 = OpConstant %int 8
%float_1 = OpConstant %float 1
%501 = OpConstantComposite %v4float %float_1 %float_1 %float_1 %float_1
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%503 = OpConstantComposite %v4float %float_0 %float_0 %float_0 %float_1
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_out = OpTypeStruct %v4float
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%504 = OpTypeFunction %void %main_out
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_1 = OpFunction %void None %28
%31 = OpLabel
%pos = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_v2float Function %34
%ipos = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_v2int Function %38
%i = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %41
%p = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_v2int Function %38
%canwalk = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%v = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %41
%directions = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %41
%j = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %41
%d = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %41
%x_110 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_130 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_150 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_171 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_111_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_131_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_151_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_172_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_237 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_250 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_289 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_302 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_341 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_354 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_393 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_406 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_238_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_251_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_290_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_303_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_342_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_355_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_394_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%x_407_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %46
%51 = OpLoad %v4float %gl_FragCoord
%54 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_v2float %x_7 %uint_0
%55 = OpLoad %v2float %54
%59 = OpISub %int %int_256 %int_14
%56 = OpSNegate %int %59
%60 = OpCompositeExtract %float %51 0
%61 = OpCompositeExtract %float %51 1
%62 = OpCompositeConstruct %v2float %60 %61
%63 = OpFDiv %v2float %62 %55
OpStore %pos %63
%65 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_float %pos %uint_0
%66 = OpLoad %float %65
%68 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_float %pos %uint_1
%69 = OpLoad %float %68
%72 = OpFMul %float %66 %float_16
%70 = OpConvertFToS %int %72
%74 = OpFMul %float %69 %float_16
%73 = OpConvertFToS %int %74
%75 = OpCompositeConstruct %v2int %70 %73
OpStore %ipos %75
OpStore %i %int_0
OpBranch %77
%77 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %78 %79 None
OpBranch %80
%80 = OpLabel
%81 = OpLoad %int %i
%82 = OpSLessThan %bool %81 %int_256
OpSelectionMerge %83 None
OpBranchConditional %82 %84 %85
%84 = OpLabel
OpBranch %83
%85 = OpLabel
OpBranch %78
%83 = OpLabel
%86 = OpLoad %int %i
%88 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %86
OpStore %88 %int_0
OpBranch %79
%79 = OpLabel
%89 = OpLoad %int %i
%91 = OpIAdd %int %89 %int_1
OpStore %i %91
OpBranch %77
%78 = OpLabel
OpStore %p %92
OpStore %canwalk %true
OpStore %v %int_0
OpBranch %94
%94 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %95 %96 None
OpBranch %97
%97 = OpLabel
%106 = OpLoad %int %v
%107 = OpIAdd %int %106 %int_1
OpStore %v %107
OpStore %directions %int_0
%108 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%109 = OpLoad %int %108
%110 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %109 %int_0
OpStore %x_111_phi %110
OpSelectionMerge %111 None
OpBranchConditional %110 %112 %111
%112 = OpLabel
%113 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%114 = OpLoad %int %113
%115 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%116 = OpLoad %int %115
%118 = OpISub %int %114 %int_2
%120 = OpIMul %int %116 %int_16
%121 = OpIAdd %int %118 %120
%122 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %121
%123 = OpLoad %int %122
%124 = OpIEqual %bool %123 %int_0
OpStore %x_110 %124
%125 = OpLoad %bool %x_110
OpStore %x_111_phi %125
OpBranch %111
%111 = OpLabel
%126 = OpLoad %bool %x_111_phi
OpSelectionMerge %127 None
OpBranchConditional %126 %128 %127
%128 = OpLabel
%129 = OpLoad %int %directions
%130 = OpIAdd %int %129 %int_1
OpStore %directions %130
OpBranch %127
%127 = OpLabel
%131 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%132 = OpLoad %int %131
%133 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %132 %int_0
OpStore %x_131_phi %133
OpSelectionMerge %134 None
OpBranchConditional %133 %135 %134
%135 = OpLabel
%136 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%137 = OpLoad %int %136
%138 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%139 = OpLoad %int %138
%140 = OpISub %int %139 %int_2
%141 = OpIMul %int %140 %int_16
%142 = OpIAdd %int %137 %141
%143 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %142
%144 = OpLoad %int %143
%145 = OpIEqual %bool %144 %int_0
OpStore %x_130 %145
%146 = OpLoad %bool %x_130
OpStore %x_131_phi %146
OpBranch %134
%134 = OpLabel
%147 = OpLoad %bool %x_131_phi
OpSelectionMerge %148 None
OpBranchConditional %147 %149 %148
%149 = OpLabel
%150 = OpLoad %int %directions
%151 = OpIAdd %int %150 %int_1
OpStore %directions %151
OpBranch %148
%148 = OpLabel
%152 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%153 = OpLoad %int %152
%154 = OpSLessThan %bool %153 %int_14
OpStore %x_151_phi %154
OpSelectionMerge %155 None
OpBranchConditional %154 %156 %155
%156 = OpLabel
%157 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%158 = OpLoad %int %157
%159 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%160 = OpLoad %int %159
%161 = OpIAdd %int %158 %int_2
%162 = OpIMul %int %160 %int_16
%163 = OpIAdd %int %161 %162
%164 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %163
%165 = OpLoad %int %164
%166 = OpIEqual %bool %165 %int_0
OpStore %x_150 %166
%167 = OpLoad %bool %x_150
OpStore %x_151_phi %167
OpBranch %155
%155 = OpLabel
%168 = OpLoad %bool %x_151_phi
OpSelectionMerge %169 None
OpBranchConditional %168 %170 %169
%170 = OpLabel
%171 = OpLoad %int %directions
%172 = OpIAdd %int %171 %int_1
OpStore %directions %172
OpBranch %169
%169 = OpLabel
%173 = OpISub %int %int_256 %56
%174 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%175 = OpLoad %int %174
%176 = OpSLessThan %bool %175 %int_14
OpStore %x_172_phi %176
OpSelectionMerge %177 None
OpBranchConditional %176 %178 %177
%178 = OpLabel
%179 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%180 = OpLoad %int %179
%181 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%182 = OpLoad %int %181
%183 = OpIAdd %int %182 %int_2
%184 = OpIMul %int %183 %int_16
%185 = OpIAdd %int %180 %184
%186 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %185
%187 = OpLoad %int %186
%188 = OpIEqual %bool %187 %int_0
OpStore %x_171 %188
%189 = OpLoad %bool %x_171
OpStore %x_172_phi %189
OpBranch %177
%177 = OpLabel
%190 = OpLoad %bool %x_172_phi
OpSelectionMerge %191 None
OpBranchConditional %190 %192 %191
%192 = OpLabel
%193 = OpLoad %int %directions
%194 = OpIAdd %int %193 %int_1
OpStore %directions %194
OpBranch %191
%191 = OpLabel
%211 = OpLoad %int %directions
%212 = OpIEqual %bool %211 %int_0
OpSelectionMerge %213 None
OpBranchConditional %212 %214 %215
%214 = OpLabel
OpStore %canwalk %false
OpStore %i %int_0
OpBranch %217
%217 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %218 %219 None
OpBranch %220
%220 = OpLabel
%221 = OpLoad %int %i
%223 = OpSLessThan %bool %221 %int_8
OpSelectionMerge %224 None
OpBranchConditional %223 %225 %226
%225 = OpLabel
OpBranch %224
%226 = OpLabel
OpBranch %218
%224 = OpLabel
OpStore %j %int_0
%227 = OpISub %int %173 %221
OpStore %x_60 %21
OpSelectionMerge %228 None
OpBranchConditional %false %229 %228
%229 = OpLabel
OpBranch %219
%228 = OpLabel
OpBranch %230
%230 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %231 %232 None
OpBranch %233
%233 = OpLabel
%234 = OpLoad %int %j
%235 = OpSLessThan %bool %234 %int_8
OpSelectionMerge %236 None
OpBranchConditional %235 %237 %238
%237 = OpLabel
OpBranch %236
%238 = OpLabel
OpBranch %231
%236 = OpLabel
%239 = OpLoad %int %j
%240 = OpLoad %int %i
%241 = OpIMul %int %239 %int_2
%242 = OpIMul %int %240 %int_2
%243 = OpIMul %int %242 %int_16
%244 = OpIAdd %int %241 %243
%245 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %244
%246 = OpLoad %int %245
%247 = OpIEqual %bool %246 %int_0
OpSelectionMerge %248 None
OpBranchConditional %247 %249 %248
%249 = OpLabel
%250 = OpLoad %int %j
%251 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%252 = OpIMul %int %250 %int_2
OpStore %251 %252
%253 = OpLoad %int %i
%254 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%255 = OpIMul %int %253 %int_2
OpStore %254 %255
OpStore %canwalk %true
OpBranch %248
%248 = OpLabel
OpBranch %232
%232 = OpLabel
%256 = OpLoad %int %j
%257 = OpIAdd %int %256 %int_1
OpStore %j %257
OpBranch %230
%231 = OpLabel
OpBranch %219
%219 = OpLabel
%258 = OpLoad %int %i
%259 = OpIAdd %int %258 %int_1
OpStore %i %259
OpBranch %217
%218 = OpLabel
%260 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%261 = OpLoad %int %260
%262 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%263 = OpLoad %int %262
%264 = OpIMul %int %263 %int_16
%265 = OpIAdd %int %261 %264
%266 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %265
OpStore %266 %int_1
OpBranch %213
%215 = OpLabel
%267 = OpLoad %int %v
%268 = OpLoad %int %directions
%269 = OpSMod %int %267 %268
OpStore %d %269
%270 = OpLoad %int %directions
%271 = OpLoad %int %v
%272 = OpIAdd %int %271 %270
OpStore %v %272
%273 = OpLoad %int %d
%274 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %273 %int_0
OpStore %x_238_phi %274
OpSelectionMerge %275 None
OpBranchConditional %274 %276 %275
%276 = OpLabel
%277 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%278 = OpLoad %int %277
%279 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %278 %int_0
OpStore %x_237 %279
%280 = OpLoad %bool %x_237
OpStore %x_238_phi %280
OpBranch %275
%275 = OpLabel
%281 = OpLoad %bool %x_238_phi
OpStore %x_251_phi %281
OpSelectionMerge %282 None
OpBranchConditional %281 %283 %282
%283 = OpLabel
%284 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%285 = OpLoad %int %284
%286 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%287 = OpLoad %int %286
%288 = OpISub %int %285 %int_2
%289 = OpIMul %int %287 %int_16
%290 = OpIAdd %int %288 %289
%291 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %290
%292 = OpLoad %int %291
%293 = OpIEqual %bool %292 %int_0
OpStore %x_250 %293
%294 = OpLoad %bool %x_250
OpStore %x_251_phi %294
OpBranch %282
%282 = OpLabel
%295 = OpLoad %bool %x_251_phi
OpSelectionMerge %296 None
OpBranchConditional %295 %297 %296
%297 = OpLabel
%298 = OpLoad %int %d
%299 = OpISub %int %298 %int_1
OpStore %d %299
%300 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%301 = OpLoad %int %300
%302 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%303 = OpLoad %int %302
%304 = OpIMul %int %303 %int_16
%305 = OpIAdd %int %301 %304
%306 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %305
OpStore %306 %int_1
%307 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%308 = OpLoad %int %307
%309 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%310 = OpLoad %int %309
%311 = OpISub %int %308 %int_1
%312 = OpIMul %int %310 %int_16
%313 = OpIAdd %int %311 %312
%314 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %313
OpStore %314 %int_1
%315 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%316 = OpLoad %int %315
%317 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%318 = OpLoad %int %317
%319 = OpISub %int %316 %int_2
%320 = OpIMul %int %318 %int_16
%321 = OpIAdd %int %319 %320
%322 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %321
OpStore %322 %int_1
%323 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%324 = OpLoad %int %323
%325 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%326 = OpISub %int %324 %int_2
OpStore %325 %326
OpBranch %296
%296 = OpLabel
%327 = OpLoad %int %d
%328 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %327 %int_0
OpStore %x_290_phi %328
OpSelectionMerge %329 None
OpBranchConditional %328 %330 %329
%330 = OpLabel
%331 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%332 = OpLoad %int %331
%333 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %332 %int_0
OpStore %x_289 %333
%334 = OpLoad %bool %x_289
OpStore %x_290_phi %334
OpBranch %329
%329 = OpLabel
%335 = OpLoad %bool %x_290_phi
OpStore %x_303_phi %335
OpSelectionMerge %336 None
OpBranchConditional %335 %337 %336
%337 = OpLabel
%338 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%339 = OpLoad %int %338
%340 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%341 = OpLoad %int %340
%342 = OpISub %int %341 %int_2
%343 = OpIMul %int %342 %int_16
%344 = OpIAdd %int %339 %343
%345 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %344
%346 = OpLoad %int %345
%347 = OpIEqual %bool %346 %int_0
OpStore %x_302 %347
%348 = OpLoad %bool %x_302
OpStore %x_303_phi %348
OpBranch %336
%336 = OpLabel
%349 = OpLoad %bool %x_303_phi
OpSelectionMerge %350 None
OpBranchConditional %349 %351 %350
%351 = OpLabel
%352 = OpLoad %int %d
%353 = OpISub %int %352 %int_1
OpStore %d %353
%354 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%355 = OpLoad %int %354
%356 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%357 = OpLoad %int %356
%358 = OpIMul %int %357 %int_16
%359 = OpIAdd %int %355 %358
%360 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %359
OpStore %360 %int_1
%361 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%362 = OpLoad %int %361
%363 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%364 = OpLoad %int %363
%365 = OpISub %int %364 %int_1
%366 = OpIMul %int %365 %int_16
%367 = OpIAdd %int %362 %366
%368 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %367
OpStore %368 %int_1
%369 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%370 = OpLoad %int %369
%371 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%372 = OpLoad %int %371
%373 = OpISub %int %372 %int_2
%374 = OpIMul %int %373 %int_16
%375 = OpIAdd %int %370 %374
%376 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %375
OpStore %376 %int_1
%377 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%378 = OpLoad %int %377
%379 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%380 = OpISub %int %378 %int_2
OpStore %379 %380
OpBranch %350
%350 = OpLabel
%381 = OpLoad %int %d
%382 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %381 %int_0
OpStore %x_342_phi %382
OpSelectionMerge %383 None
OpBranchConditional %382 %384 %383
%384 = OpLabel
%385 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%386 = OpLoad %int %385
%387 = OpSLessThan %bool %386 %int_14
OpStore %x_341 %387
%388 = OpLoad %bool %x_341
OpStore %x_342_phi %388
OpBranch %383
%383 = OpLabel
%389 = OpLoad %bool %x_342_phi
OpStore %x_355_phi %389
OpSelectionMerge %390 None
OpBranchConditional %389 %391 %390
%391 = OpLabel
%392 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%393 = OpLoad %int %392
%394 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%395 = OpLoad %int %394
%396 = OpIAdd %int %393 %int_2
%397 = OpIMul %int %395 %int_16
%398 = OpIAdd %int %396 %397
%399 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %398
%400 = OpLoad %int %399
%401 = OpIEqual %bool %400 %int_0
OpStore %x_354 %401
%402 = OpLoad %bool %x_354
OpStore %x_355_phi %402
OpBranch %390
%390 = OpLabel
%403 = OpLoad %bool %x_355_phi
OpSelectionMerge %404 None
OpBranchConditional %403 %405 %404
%405 = OpLabel
%406 = OpLoad %int %d
%407 = OpISub %int %406 %int_1
OpStore %d %407
%408 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%409 = OpLoad %int %408
%410 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%411 = OpLoad %int %410
%412 = OpIMul %int %411 %int_16
%413 = OpIAdd %int %409 %412
%414 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %413
OpStore %414 %int_1
%415 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%416 = OpLoad %int %415
%417 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%418 = OpLoad %int %417
%419 = OpIAdd %int %416 %int_1
%420 = OpIMul %int %418 %int_16
%421 = OpIAdd %int %419 %420
%422 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %421
OpStore %422 %int_1
%423 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%424 = OpLoad %int %423
%425 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%426 = OpLoad %int %425
%427 = OpIAdd %int %424 %int_2
%428 = OpIMul %int %426 %int_16
%429 = OpIAdd %int %427 %428
%430 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %429
OpStore %430 %int_1
%431 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%432 = OpLoad %int %431
%433 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%434 = OpIAdd %int %432 %int_2
OpStore %433 %434
OpBranch %404
%404 = OpLabel
%435 = OpLoad %int %d
%436 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %435 %int_0
OpStore %x_394_phi %436
OpSelectionMerge %437 None
OpBranchConditional %436 %438 %437
%438 = OpLabel
%439 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%440 = OpLoad %int %439
%441 = OpSLessThan %bool %440 %int_14
OpStore %x_393 %441
%442 = OpLoad %bool %x_393
OpStore %x_394_phi %442
OpBranch %437
%437 = OpLabel
%443 = OpLoad %bool %x_394_phi
OpStore %x_407_phi %443
OpSelectionMerge %444 None
OpBranchConditional %443 %445 %444
%445 = OpLabel
%446 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%447 = OpLoad %int %446
%448 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%449 = OpLoad %int %448
%450 = OpIAdd %int %449 %int_2
%451 = OpIMul %int %450 %int_16
%452 = OpIAdd %int %447 %451
%453 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %452
%454 = OpLoad %int %453
%455 = OpIEqual %bool %454 %int_0
OpStore %x_406 %455
%456 = OpLoad %bool %x_406
OpStore %x_407_phi %456
OpBranch %444
%444 = OpLabel
%457 = OpLoad %bool %x_407_phi
OpSelectionMerge %458 None
OpBranchConditional %457 %459 %458
%459 = OpLabel
%460 = OpLoad %int %d
%461 = OpISub %int %460 %int_1
OpStore %d %461
%462 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%463 = OpLoad %int %462
%464 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%465 = OpLoad %int %464
%466 = OpIMul %int %465 %int_16
%467 = OpIAdd %int %463 %466
%468 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %467
OpStore %468 %int_1
%469 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%470 = OpLoad %int %469
%471 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%472 = OpLoad %int %471
%473 = OpIAdd %int %472 %int_1
%474 = OpIMul %int %473 %int_16
%475 = OpIAdd %int %470 %474
%476 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %475
OpStore %476 %int_1
%477 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%478 = OpLoad %int %477
%479 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%480 = OpLoad %int %479
%481 = OpIAdd %int %480 %int_2
%482 = OpIMul %int %481 %int_16
%483 = OpIAdd %int %478 %482
%484 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %483
OpStore %484 %int_1
%485 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%486 = OpLoad %int %485
%487 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%488 = OpIAdd %int %486 %int_2
OpStore %487 %488
OpBranch %458
%458 = OpLabel
OpBranch %213
%213 = OpLabel
%489 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %ipos %uint_1
%490 = OpLoad %int %489
%491 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %ipos %uint_0
%492 = OpLoad %int %491
%493 = OpIMul %int %490 %int_16
%494 = OpIAdd %int %493 %492
%495 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %494
%496 = OpLoad %int %495
%497 = OpIEqual %bool %496 %int_1
OpSelectionMerge %498 None
OpBranchConditional %497 %499 %498
%499 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_GLF_color %501
OpReturn
%498 = OpLabel
OpBranch %96
%96 = OpLabel
%502 = OpLoad %bool %canwalk
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranchConditional %502 %94 %95
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%95 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpStore %x_GLF_color %503
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%tint_symbol_3 = OpFunction %void None %504
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%tint_symbol_1 = OpFunctionParameter %main_out
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%508 = OpLabel
%509 = OpCompositeExtract %v4float %tint_symbol_1 0
OpStore %tint_symbol_2 %509
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
%main = OpFunction %void None %28
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%511 = OpLabel
%512 = OpLoad %v4float %tint_symbol
OpStore %gl_FragCoord %512
%513 = OpFunctionCall %void %main_1
%515 = OpLoad %v4float %x_GLF_color
%516 = OpCompositeConstruct %main_out %515
%514 = OpFunctionCall %void %tint_symbol_3 %516
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd