168 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
168 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
|
# Abseil FAQ
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Is Abseil the right home for my utility library?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Most often the answer to the question is "no." As both the [About
|
||
|
Abseil](https://abseil.io/about/) page and our [contributing
|
||
|
guidelines](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-guidelines)
|
||
|
explain, Abseil contains a variety of core C++ library code that is widely used
|
||
|
at [Google](https://www.google.com/). As such, Abseil's primary purpose is to be
|
||
|
used as a dependency by Google's open source C++ projects. While we do hope that
|
||
|
Abseil is also useful to the C++ community at large, this added constraint also
|
||
|
means that we are unlikely to accept a contribution of utility code that isn't
|
||
|
already widely used by Google.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## How to I set the C++ dialect used to build Abseil?
|
||
|
|
||
|
The short answer is that whatever mechanism you choose, you need to make sure
|
||
|
that you set this option consistently at the global level for your entire
|
||
|
project. If, for example, you want to set the C++ dialect to C++17, with
|
||
|
[Bazel](https://bazel/build/) as the build system and `gcc` or `clang` as the
|
||
|
compiler, there several ways to do this:
|
||
|
* Pass `--cxxopt=-std=c++17` on the command line (for example, `bazel build
|
||
|
--cxxopt=-std=c++17 ...`)
|
||
|
* Set the environment variable `BAZEL_CXXOPTS` (for example,
|
||
|
`BAZEL_CXXOPTS=-std=c++17`)
|
||
|
* Add `build --cxxopt=-std=c++17` to your [`.bazelrc`
|
||
|
file](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/guide.html#bazelrc)
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you are using CMake as the build system, you'll need to add a line like
|
||
|
`set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 17)` to your top level `CMakeLists.txt` file. If you
|
||
|
are developing a library designed to be used by other clients, you should
|
||
|
instead leave `CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD` unset and configure the minimum C++ standard
|
||
|
required by each of your library targets via `target_compile_features`. See the
|
||
|
[CMake build
|
||
|
instructions](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/blob/master/CMake/README.md)
|
||
|
for more information.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For a longer answer to this question and to understand why some other approaches
|
||
|
don't work, see the answer to ["What is ABI and why don't you recommend using a
|
||
|
pre-compiled version of
|
||
|
Abseil?"](#what-is-abi-and-why-dont-you-recommend-using-a-pre-compiled-version-of-abseil)
|
||
|
|
||
|
## What is ABI and why don't you recommend using a pre-compiled version of Abseil?
|
||
|
|
||
|
For the purposes of this discussion, you can think of
|
||
|
[ABI](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_binary_interface) as the
|
||
|
compiled representation of the interfaces in code. This is in contrast to
|
||
|
[API](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_programming_interface), which
|
||
|
you can think of as the interfaces as defined by the code itself. [Abseil has a
|
||
|
strong promise of API compatibility, but does not make any promise of ABI
|
||
|
compatibility](https://abseil.io/about/compatibility). Let's take a look at what
|
||
|
this means in practice.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You might be tempted to do something like this in a
|
||
|
[Bazel](https://bazel.build/) `BUILD` file:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
# DON'T DO THIS!!!
|
||
|
cc_library(
|
||
|
name = "my_library",
|
||
|
srcs = ["my_library.cc"],
|
||
|
copts = ["-std=c++17"], # May create a mixed-mode compile!
|
||
|
deps = ["@com_google_absl//absl/strings"],
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Applying `-std=c++17` to an individual target in your `BUILD` file is going to
|
||
|
compile that specific target in C++17 mode, but it isn't going to ensure the
|
||
|
Abseil library is built in C++17 mode, since the Abseil library itself is a
|
||
|
different build target. If your code includes an Abseil header, then your
|
||
|
program may contain conflicting definitions of the same
|
||
|
class/function/variable/enum, etc. As a rule, all compile options that affect
|
||
|
the ABI of a program need to be applied to the entire build on a global basis.
|
||
|
|
||
|
C++ has something called the [One Definition
|
||
|
Rule](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Definition_Rule) (ODR). C++ doesn't
|
||
|
allow multiple definitions of the same class/function/variable/enum, etc. ODR
|
||
|
violations sometimes result in linker errors, but linkers do not always catch
|
||
|
violations. Uncaught ODR violations can result in strange runtime behaviors or
|
||
|
crashes that can be hard to debug.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you build the Abseil library and your code using different compile options
|
||
|
that affect ABI, there is a good chance you will run afoul of the One Definition
|
||
|
Rule. Examples of GCC compile options that affect ABI include (but aren't
|
||
|
limited to) language dialect (e.g. `-std=`), optimization level (e.g. `-O2`),
|
||
|
code generation flags (e.g. `-fexceptions`), and preprocessor defines
|
||
|
(e.g. `-DNDEBUG`).
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you use a pre-compiled version of Abseil, (for example, from your Linux
|
||
|
distribution package manager or from something like
|
||
|
[vcpkg](https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg)) you have to be very careful to
|
||
|
ensure ABI compatibility across the components of your program. The only way you
|
||
|
can be sure your program is going to be correct regarding ABI is to ensure
|
||
|
you've used the exact same compile options as were used to build the
|
||
|
pre-compiled library. This does not mean that Abseil cannot work as part of a
|
||
|
Linux distribution since a knowledgeable binary packager will have ensured that
|
||
|
all packages have been built with consistent compile options. This is one of the
|
||
|
reasons we warn against - though do not outright reject - using Abseil as a
|
||
|
pre-compiled library.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Another possible way that you might afoul of ABI issues is if you accidentally
|
||
|
include two versions of Abseil in your program. Multiple versions of Abseil can
|
||
|
end up within the same binary if your program uses the Abseil library and
|
||
|
another library also transitively depends on Abseil (resulting in what is
|
||
|
sometimes called the diamond dependency problem). In cases such as this you must
|
||
|
structure your build so that all libraries use the same version of Abseil.
|
||
|
[Abseil's strong promise of API compatibility between
|
||
|
releases](https://abseil.io/about/compatibility) means the latest "HEAD" release
|
||
|
of Abseil is almost certainly the right choice if you are doing as we recommend
|
||
|
and building all of your code from source.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For these reasons we recommend you avoid pre-compiled code and build the Abseil
|
||
|
library yourself in a consistent manner with the rest of your code.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## What is "live at head" and how do I do it?
|
||
|
|
||
|
From Abseil's point-of-view, "live at head" means that every Abseil source
|
||
|
release (which happens on an almost daily basis) is either API compatible with
|
||
|
the previous release, or comes with an automated tool that you can run over code
|
||
|
to make it compatible. In practice, the need to use an automated tool is
|
||
|
extremely rare. This means that upgrading from one source release to another
|
||
|
should be a routine practice that can and should be performed often.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We recommend you update to the [latest commit in the `master` branch of
|
||
|
Abseil](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/commits/master) as often as
|
||
|
possible. Not only will you pick up bug fixes more quickly, but if you have good
|
||
|
automated testing, you will catch and be able to fix any [Hyrum's
|
||
|
Law](https://www.hyrumslaw.com/) dependency problems on an incremental basis
|
||
|
instead of being overwhelmed by them and having difficulty isolating them if you
|
||
|
wait longer between updates.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you are using the [Bazel](https://bazel.build/) build system and its
|
||
|
[external dependencies](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/external.html)
|
||
|
feature, updating the
|
||
|
[`http_archive`](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/repo/http.html#http_archive)
|
||
|
rule in your
|
||
|
[`WORKSPACE`](https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/be/workspace.html) for
|
||
|
`com_google_abseil` to point to the [latest commit in the `master` branch of
|
||
|
Abseil](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/commits/master) is all you need to
|
||
|
do. For example, on February 11, 2020, the latest commit to the master branch
|
||
|
was `98eb410c93ad059f9bba1bf43f5bb916fc92a5ea`. To update to this commit, you
|
||
|
would add the following snippet to your `WORKSPACE` file:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
http_archive(
|
||
|
name = "com_google_absl",
|
||
|
urls = ["https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/archive/98eb410c93ad059f9bba1bf43f5bb916fc92a5ea.zip"], # 2020-02-11T18:50:53Z
|
||
|
strip_prefix = "abseil-cpp-98eb410c93ad059f9bba1bf43f5bb916fc92a5ea",
|
||
|
sha256 = "aabf6c57e3834f8dc3873a927f37eaf69975d4b28117fc7427dfb1c661542a87",
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
To get the `sha256` of this URL, run `curl -sL --output -
|
||
|
https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/archive/98eb410c93ad059f9bba1bf43f5bb916fc92a5ea.zip
|
||
|
| sha256sum -`.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can commit the updated `WORKSPACE` file to your source control every time
|
||
|
you update, and if you have good automated testing, you might even consider
|
||
|
automating this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One thing we don't recommend is using GitHub's `master.zip` files (for example
|
||
|
[https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/archive/master.zip](https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/archive/master.zip)),
|
||
|
which are always the latest commit in the `master` branch, to implement live at
|
||
|
head. Since these `master.zip` URLs are not versioned, you will lose build
|
||
|
reproducibility. In addition, some build systems, including Bazel, will simply
|
||
|
cache this file, which means you won't actually be updating to the latest
|
||
|
release until your cache is cleared or invalidated.
|