tint: Have ast::DiagnosticControl use ast::Identifier

Instead of ast::IdentifierExpression.
The name is not an expression.

Fixed: tint:1257
Change-Id: I3161d20f584bfedf730b9257233f9dfcb064298a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/118344
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ben Clayton 2023-02-02 22:20:32 +00:00 committed by Dawn LUCI CQ
parent f031ca2d44
commit 12914eedf6
22 changed files with 92 additions and 92 deletions

View File

@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ TEST_F(BlockStatementTest, Creation_WithAttributes) {
auto* d = create<DiscardStatement>();
auto* ptr = d;
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("foo"));
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("bar"));
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "foo");
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "bar");
auto* b = create<BlockStatement>(utils::Vector{d}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
ASSERT_EQ(b->statements.Length(), 1u);

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ using namespace tint::number_suffixes; // NOLINT
using DiagnosticAttributeTest = TestHelper;
TEST_F(DiagnosticAttributeTest, Creation) {
auto* name = Expr("foo");
auto* name = Ident("foo");
auto* d = DiagnosticAttribute(DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, name);
EXPECT_EQ(d->Name(), "diagnostic");
EXPECT_EQ(d->control->severity, DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning);

View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
// Forward declarations
namespace tint::ast {
class IdentifierExpression;
class Identifier;
} // namespace tint::ast
namespace tint::ast {
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
NodeID nid,
const Source& src,
DiagnosticSeverity sev,
const IdentifierExpression* rule)
const Identifier* rule)
: Base(pid, nid, src), severity(sev), rule_name(rule) {}
~DiagnosticControl() override;
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
DiagnosticSeverity severity;
/// The diagnostic rule name.
const IdentifierExpression* rule_name;
const Identifier* rule_name;
};
} // namespace tint::ast

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ See:
// Forward declarations
namespace tint::ast {
class IdentifierExpression;
class Identifier;
} // namespace tint::ast
namespace tint::ast {
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
NodeID nid,
const Source& src,
DiagnosticSeverity sev,
const IdentifierExpression* rule)
const Identifier* rule)
: Base(pid, nid, src), severity(sev), rule_name(rule) {}
~DiagnosticControl() override;
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
DiagnosticSeverity severity;
/// The diagnostic rule name.
const IdentifierExpression* rule_name;
const Identifier* rule_name;
};
} // namespace tint::ast

View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ namespace {
using DiagnosticControlTest = TestHelper;
TEST_F(DiagnosticControlTest, Creation) {
auto* name = Expr("foo");
auto* name = Ident("foo");
Source source;
source.range.begin = Source::Location{20, 2};
source.range.end = Source::Location{20, 5};

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ namespace {
using DiagnosticControlTest = TestHelper;
TEST_F(DiagnosticControlTest, Creation) {
auto* name = Expr("foo");
auto* name = Ident("foo");
Source source;
source.range.begin = Source::Location{20, 2};
source.range.end = Source::Location{20, 5};

View File

@ -133,9 +133,9 @@ TEST_F(ModuleTest, CloneOrder) {
TEST_F(ModuleTest, Directives) {
auto* enable_1 = Enable(ast::Extension::kF16);
auto* diagnostic_1 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("foo"));
auto* diagnostic_1 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "foo");
auto* enable_2 = Enable(ast::Extension::kChromiumExperimentalFullPtrParameters);
auto* diagnostic_2 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("bar"));
auto* diagnostic_2 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "bar");
this->SetResolveOnBuild(false);
Program program(std::move(*this));

View File

@ -3280,23 +3280,23 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
/// @returns the diagnostic attribute pointer
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(
const Source& source,
template <typename NAME>
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(const Source& source,
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(source,
DiagnosticControl(source, severity, rule_name));
NAME&& rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(
source, DiagnosticControl(source, severity, std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
}
/// Creates an ast::DiagnosticAttribute
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
/// @returns the diagnostic attribute pointer
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(source_,
DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, rule_name));
template <typename NAME>
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
NAME&& rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(
source_, DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
}
/// Creates an ast::DiagnosticControl
@ -3304,19 +3304,23 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
template <typename NAME>
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticControl(const Source& source,
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source, severity, rule_name);
NAME&& rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source, severity,
Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
}
/// Creates an ast::DiagnosticControl
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
template <typename NAME>
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticControl(ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source_, severity, rule_name);
NAME&& rule_name) {
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source_, severity,
Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
}
/// Add a global diagnostic control to the module.
@ -3324,10 +3328,11 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
template <typename NAME>
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticDirective(const Source& source,
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source, severity, rule_name);
NAME&& rule_name) {
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source, severity, Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
AST().AddDiagnosticControl(control);
return control;
}
@ -3336,9 +3341,10 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
template <typename NAME>
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, rule_name);
NAME&& rule_name) {
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
AST().AddDiagnosticControl(control);
return control;
}

View File

@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ Program Parse(const std::vector<uint32_t>& input, const Options& options) {
if (options.allow_non_uniform_derivatives) {
// Suppress errors regarding non-uniform derivative operations if requested, by adding a
// diagnostic directive to the module.
builder.DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
builder.Expr("derivative_uniformity"));
builder.DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "derivative_uniformity");
}
// The SPIR-V parser can construct disjoint AST nodes, which is invalid for

View File

@ -3775,7 +3775,7 @@ Expect<const ast::DiagnosticControl*> ParserImpl::expect_diagnostic_control() {
match(Token::Type::kComma);
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source, severity_control.value,
builder_.Expr(rule_name.source, rule_name.value));
builder_.Ident(rule_name.source, rule_name.value));
});
}

View File

@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticAttribute_Valid) {
auto* d = a.value->As<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>();
ASSERT_NE(d, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(d->control->severity, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff);
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(d->control->rule_name);
auto* r = d->control->rule_name;
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
}
} // namespace

View File

@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ TEST_P(DiagnosticControlParserTest, DiagnosticControl_Valid) {
ASSERT_TRUE(e->Is<ast::DiagnosticControl>());
EXPECT_EQ(e->severity, params.second);
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(e->rule_name);
auto* r = e->rule_name;
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
}
INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(DiagnosticControlParserTest,
DiagnosticControlParserTest,
@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticControl_Valid_TrailingComma) {
ASSERT_TRUE(e->Is<ast::DiagnosticControl>());
EXPECT_EQ(e->severity, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError);
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(e->rule_name);
auto* r = e->rule_name;
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
}
TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticControl_MissingOpenParen) {

View File

@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticDirective_Valid) {
ASSERT_EQ(ast.GlobalDeclarations().Length(), 1u);
EXPECT_EQ(ast.GlobalDeclarations()[0], control);
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(control->rule_name);
auto* r = control->rule_name;
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
}
TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticDirective_MissingSemicolon) {

View File

@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static utils::Vector<const ast::Attribute*, 2> createAttributes(const Source& so
return {builder.Builtin(source, ast::BuiltinValue::kPosition)};
case AttributeKind::kDiagnostic:
return {builder.DiagnosticAttribute(source, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo,
builder.Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"))};
"chromium_unreachable_code")};
case AttributeKind::kGroup:
return {builder.Group(source, 1_a)};
case AttributeKind::kId:

View File

@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDependencyGraphOrderedGlobalsTest, DirectiveFirst) {
auto* var_1 = GlobalVar("SYMBOL1", ty.i32());
auto* enable = Enable(ast::Extension::kF16);
auto* var_2 = GlobalVar("SYMBOL2", ty.f32());
auto* diagnostic = DiagnosticControl(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("foo"));
auto* diagnostic = DiagnosticControl(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "foo");
AST().AddDiagnosticControl(diagnostic);
EXPECT_THAT(AST().GlobalDeclarations(), ElementsAre(var_1, enable, var_2, diagnostic));

View File

@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_DefaultSeverity) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaDirective) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaDirective) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaDirective) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaDirective) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaDirective) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaDirective) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_OffViaDirective) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_OffViaDirective) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaAttribute) {
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaAttribute) {
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaAttribute) {
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
@ -94,8 +93,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaAttribute) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaAttribute) {
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
@ -105,8 +103,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaAttribute) {
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_OffViaAttribute) {
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
@ -122,9 +119,9 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaDirective_Overridd
// return;
// return; // Should produce a warning
// }
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
@ -150,7 +147,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, FunctionAttributeScope) {
// }
{
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "chromium_unreachable_code");
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(),
utils::Vector{
Return(),
@ -167,7 +164,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, FunctionAttributeScope) {
}
{
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, "chromium_unreachable_code");
Func("zoo", {}, ty.void_(),
utils::Vector{
Return(),
@ -203,7 +200,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, BlockAttributeScope) {
// }
auto attr = [&](auto severity) {
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"))};
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, "chromium_unreachable_code")};
};
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(),
utils::Vector{
@ -243,7 +240,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, BlockAttributeScope) {
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnrecognizedRuleName_Directive) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
R"(12:34 warning: unrecognized diagnostic rule 'chromium_unreachable_cod'
@ -253,7 +250,7 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity')");
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnrecognizedRuleName_Attribute) {
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr});
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
@ -264,17 +261,17 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity')");
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameSameSeverity_Directive) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
Ident(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Directive) {
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
"chromium_unreachable_code");
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
"chromium_unreachable_code");
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
R"(56:78 error: conflicting diagnostic directive
@ -283,9 +280,9 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Directi
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Directive) {
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
R"(warning: unrecognized diagnostic rule 'chromium_unreachable_codes'
@ -300,26 +297,26 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity'
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_DifferentUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Directive) {
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codex"));
"chromium_unreachable_codex");
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameSameSeverity_Attribute) {
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
Ident(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
}
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Attribute) {
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
"chromium_unreachable_code");
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
"chromium_unreachable_code");
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
@ -329,9 +326,9 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Attribu
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Attribute) {
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
@ -347,9 +344,9 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity'
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_DifferentUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Attribute) {
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codex"));
"chromium_unreachable_codex");
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
}

View File

@ -3060,9 +3060,8 @@ sem::Expression* Resolver::UnaryOp(const ast::UnaryOpExpression* unary) {
bool Resolver::DiagnosticControl(const ast::DiagnosticControl* control) {
Mark(control->rule_name);
Mark(control->rule_name->identifier);
auto rule_name = builder_->Symbols().NameFor(control->rule_name->identifier->symbol);
auto rule_name = builder_->Symbols().NameFor(control->rule_name->symbol);
auto rule = ast::ParseDiagnosticRule(rule_name);
if (rule != ast::DiagnosticRule::kUndefined) {
validator_.DiagnosticFilters().Set(rule, control->severity);

View File

@ -2452,7 +2452,7 @@ bool Validator::DiagnosticControls(utils::VectorRef<const ast::DiagnosticControl
// They conflict if the rule name is the same and the severity is different.
utils::Hashmap<Symbol, const ast::DiagnosticControl*, 8> diagnostics;
for (auto* dc : controls) {
auto diag_added = diagnostics.Add(dc->rule_name->identifier->symbol, dc);
auto diag_added = diagnostics.Add(dc->rule_name->symbol, dc);
if (!diag_added && (*diag_added.value)->severity != dc->severity) {
{
std::ostringstream ss;
@ -2461,8 +2461,8 @@ bool Validator::DiagnosticControls(utils::VectorRef<const ast::DiagnosticControl
}
{
std::ostringstream ss;
ss << "severity of '" << symbols_.NameFor(dc->rule_name->identifier->symbol)
<< "' set to '" << dc->severity << "' here";
ss << "severity of '" << symbols_.NameFor(dc->rule_name->symbol) << "' set to '"
<< dc->severity << "' here";
AddNote(ss.str(), (*diag_added.value)->source);
}
return false;

View File

@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ class DiagnosticSeverityTest : public TestHelper {
auto block_severity = ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo;
auto if_severity = ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo;
auto attr = [&](auto severity) {
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"))};
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, "chromium_unreachable_code")};
};
auto* return_1 = Return();
auto* if_1 = If(Expr(true), Block(utils::Vector{return_1}, attr(if_severity)));
auto* block_1 = Block(utils::Vector{if_1}, attr(block_severity));
auto* func_attr = DiagnosticAttribute(func_severity, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
auto* func_attr = DiagnosticAttribute(func_severity, "chromium_unreachable_code");
auto* foo = Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), utils::Vector{block_1}, utils::Vector{func_attr});
auto* return_2 = Return();
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ class DiagnosticSeverityTest : public TestHelper {
};
TEST_F(DiagnosticSeverityTest, WithDirective) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
Run(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError);
}

View File

@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ Transform::ApplyResult Renamer::Apply(const Program* src,
}
},
[&](const ast::DiagnosticControl* diagnostic) {
preserved_identifiers.Add(diagnostic->rule_name->identifier);
preserved_identifiers.Add(diagnostic->rule_name);
},
[&](const ast::TypeName* type_name) {
if (is_type_short_name(type_name->name)) {

View File

@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ bool GeneratorImpl::Generate() {
bool GeneratorImpl::EmitDiagnosticControl(std::ostream& out,
const ast::DiagnosticControl* diagnostic) {
out << "diagnostic(" << diagnostic->severity << ", "
<< program_->Symbols().NameFor(diagnostic->rule_name->identifier->symbol) << ")";
<< program_->Symbols().NameFor(diagnostic->rule_name->symbol) << ")";
return true;
}

View File

@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ namespace {
using WgslGeneratorImplTest = TestHelper;
TEST_F(WgslGeneratorImplTest, Emit_DiagnosticDirective) {
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
GeneratorImpl& gen = Build();
@ -31,8 +31,7 @@ TEST_F(WgslGeneratorImplTest, Emit_DiagnosticDirective) {
}
TEST_F(WgslGeneratorImplTest, Emit_DiagnosticAttribute) {
auto* attr =
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr});
GeneratorImpl& gen = Build();