tint: Have ast::DiagnosticControl use ast::Identifier
Instead of ast::IdentifierExpression. The name is not an expression. Fixed: tint:1257 Change-Id: I3161d20f584bfedf730b9257233f9dfcb064298a Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/118344 Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org> Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f031ca2d44
commit
12914eedf6
|
@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ TEST_F(BlockStatementTest, Creation_WithAttributes) {
|
|||
auto* d = create<DiscardStatement>();
|
||||
auto* ptr = d;
|
||||
|
||||
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("foo"));
|
||||
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("bar"));
|
||||
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "foo");
|
||||
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "bar");
|
||||
auto* b = create<BlockStatement>(utils::Vector{d}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(b->statements.Length(), 1u);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ using namespace tint::number_suffixes; // NOLINT
|
|||
using DiagnosticAttributeTest = TestHelper;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(DiagnosticAttributeTest, Creation) {
|
||||
auto* name = Expr("foo");
|
||||
auto* name = Ident("foo");
|
||||
auto* d = DiagnosticAttribute(DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, name);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(d->Name(), "diagnostic");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(d->control->severity, DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
// Forward declarations
|
||||
namespace tint::ast {
|
||||
class IdentifierExpression;
|
||||
class Identifier;
|
||||
} // namespace tint::ast
|
||||
|
||||
namespace tint::ast {
|
||||
|
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
|
|||
NodeID nid,
|
||||
const Source& src,
|
||||
DiagnosticSeverity sev,
|
||||
const IdentifierExpression* rule)
|
||||
const Identifier* rule)
|
||||
: Base(pid, nid, src), severity(sev), rule_name(rule) {}
|
||||
|
||||
~DiagnosticControl() override;
|
||||
|
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
|
|||
DiagnosticSeverity severity;
|
||||
|
||||
/// The diagnostic rule name.
|
||||
const IdentifierExpression* rule_name;
|
||||
const Identifier* rule_name;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
} // namespace tint::ast
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ See:
|
|||
|
||||
// Forward declarations
|
||||
namespace tint::ast {
|
||||
class IdentifierExpression;
|
||||
class Identifier;
|
||||
} // namespace tint::ast
|
||||
|
||||
namespace tint::ast {
|
||||
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
|
|||
NodeID nid,
|
||||
const Source& src,
|
||||
DiagnosticSeverity sev,
|
||||
const IdentifierExpression* rule)
|
||||
const Identifier* rule)
|
||||
: Base(pid, nid, src), severity(sev), rule_name(rule) {}
|
||||
|
||||
~DiagnosticControl() override;
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ class DiagnosticControl : public Castable<DiagnosticControl, Node> {
|
|||
DiagnosticSeverity severity;
|
||||
|
||||
/// The diagnostic rule name.
|
||||
const IdentifierExpression* rule_name;
|
||||
const Identifier* rule_name;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
} // namespace tint::ast
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ namespace {
|
|||
using DiagnosticControlTest = TestHelper;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(DiagnosticControlTest, Creation) {
|
||||
auto* name = Expr("foo");
|
||||
auto* name = Ident("foo");
|
||||
Source source;
|
||||
source.range.begin = Source::Location{20, 2};
|
||||
source.range.end = Source::Location{20, 5};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ namespace {
|
|||
using DiagnosticControlTest = TestHelper;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(DiagnosticControlTest, Creation) {
|
||||
auto* name = Expr("foo");
|
||||
auto* name = Ident("foo");
|
||||
Source source;
|
||||
source.range.begin = Source::Location{20, 2};
|
||||
source.range.end = Source::Location{20, 5};
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -133,9 +133,9 @@ TEST_F(ModuleTest, CloneOrder) {
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ModuleTest, Directives) {
|
||||
auto* enable_1 = Enable(ast::Extension::kF16);
|
||||
auto* diagnostic_1 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("foo"));
|
||||
auto* diagnostic_1 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "foo");
|
||||
auto* enable_2 = Enable(ast::Extension::kChromiumExperimentalFullPtrParameters);
|
||||
auto* diagnostic_2 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("bar"));
|
||||
auto* diagnostic_2 = DiagnosticDirective(DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "bar");
|
||||
|
||||
this->SetResolveOnBuild(false);
|
||||
Program program(std::move(*this));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3280,23 +3280,23 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
|
|||
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
|
||||
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
|
||||
/// @returns the diagnostic attribute pointer
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(
|
||||
const Source& source,
|
||||
template <typename NAME>
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(const Source& source,
|
||||
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(source,
|
||||
DiagnosticControl(source, severity, rule_name));
|
||||
NAME&& rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(
|
||||
source, DiagnosticControl(source, severity, std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Creates an ast::DiagnosticAttribute
|
||||
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
|
||||
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
|
||||
/// @returns the diagnostic attribute pointer
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(
|
||||
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(source_,
|
||||
DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, rule_name));
|
||||
template <typename NAME>
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticAttribute* DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
NAME&& rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>(
|
||||
source_, DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Creates an ast::DiagnosticControl
|
||||
|
@ -3304,19 +3304,23 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
|
|||
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
|
||||
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
|
||||
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
|
||||
template <typename NAME>
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticControl(const Source& source,
|
||||
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source, severity, rule_name);
|
||||
NAME&& rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source, severity,
|
||||
Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Creates an ast::DiagnosticControl
|
||||
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
|
||||
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
|
||||
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
|
||||
template <typename NAME>
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticControl(ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source_, severity, rule_name);
|
||||
NAME&& rule_name) {
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source_, severity,
|
||||
Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Add a global diagnostic control to the module.
|
||||
|
@ -3324,10 +3328,11 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
|
|||
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
|
||||
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
|
||||
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
|
||||
template <typename NAME>
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticDirective(const Source& source,
|
||||
ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
|
||||
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source, severity, rule_name);
|
||||
NAME&& rule_name) {
|
||||
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source, severity, Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
|
||||
AST().AddDiagnosticControl(control);
|
||||
return control;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3336,9 +3341,10 @@ class ProgramBuilder {
|
|||
/// @param severity the diagnostic severity control
|
||||
/// @param rule_name the diagnostic rule name
|
||||
/// @returns the diagnostic control pointer
|
||||
template <typename NAME>
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticControl* DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity severity,
|
||||
const ast::IdentifierExpression* rule_name) {
|
||||
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, rule_name);
|
||||
NAME&& rule_name) {
|
||||
auto* control = DiagnosticControl(source_, severity, Ident(std::forward<NAME>(rule_name)));
|
||||
AST().AddDiagnosticControl(control);
|
||||
return control;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -41,8 +41,7 @@ Program Parse(const std::vector<uint32_t>& input, const Options& options) {
|
|||
if (options.allow_non_uniform_derivatives) {
|
||||
// Suppress errors regarding non-uniform derivative operations if requested, by adding a
|
||||
// diagnostic directive to the module.
|
||||
builder.DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
builder.Expr("derivative_uniformity"));
|
||||
builder.DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "derivative_uniformity");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The SPIR-V parser can construct disjoint AST nodes, which is invalid for
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3775,7 +3775,7 @@ Expect<const ast::DiagnosticControl*> ParserImpl::expect_diagnostic_control() {
|
|||
match(Token::Type::kComma);
|
||||
|
||||
return create<ast::DiagnosticControl>(source, severity_control.value,
|
||||
builder_.Expr(rule_name.source, rule_name.value));
|
||||
builder_.Ident(rule_name.source, rule_name.value));
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticAttribute_Valid) {
|
|||
auto* d = a.value->As<ast::DiagnosticAttribute>();
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(d, nullptr);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(d->control->severity, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff);
|
||||
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(d->control->rule_name);
|
||||
auto* r = d->control->rule_name;
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} // namespace
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ TEST_P(DiagnosticControlParserTest, DiagnosticControl_Valid) {
|
|||
ASSERT_TRUE(e->Is<ast::DiagnosticControl>());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(e->severity, params.second);
|
||||
|
||||
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(e->rule_name);
|
||||
auto* r = e->rule_name;
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
}
|
||||
INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P(DiagnosticControlParserTest,
|
||||
DiagnosticControlParserTest,
|
||||
|
@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticControl_Valid_TrailingComma) {
|
|||
ASSERT_TRUE(e->Is<ast::DiagnosticControl>());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(e->severity, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError);
|
||||
|
||||
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(e->rule_name);
|
||||
auto* r = e->rule_name;
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticControl_MissingOpenParen) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticDirective_Valid) {
|
|||
ASSERT_EQ(ast.GlobalDeclarations().Length(), 1u);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(ast.GlobalDeclarations()[0], control);
|
||||
|
||||
auto* r = As<ast::IdentifierExpression>(control->rule_name);
|
||||
auto* r = control->rule_name;
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(r, nullptr);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->identifier->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(p->builder().Symbols().NameFor(r->symbol), "foo");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ParserImplTest, DiagnosticDirective_MissingSemicolon) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static utils::Vector<const ast::Attribute*, 2> createAttributes(const Source& so
|
|||
return {builder.Builtin(source, ast::BuiltinValue::kPosition)};
|
||||
case AttributeKind::kDiagnostic:
|
||||
return {builder.DiagnosticAttribute(source, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo,
|
||||
builder.Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"))};
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_code")};
|
||||
case AttributeKind::kGroup:
|
||||
return {builder.Group(source, 1_a)};
|
||||
case AttributeKind::kId:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDependencyGraphOrderedGlobalsTest, DirectiveFirst) {
|
|||
auto* var_1 = GlobalVar("SYMBOL1", ty.i32());
|
||||
auto* enable = Enable(ast::Extension::kF16);
|
||||
auto* var_2 = GlobalVar("SYMBOL2", ty.f32());
|
||||
auto* diagnostic = DiagnosticControl(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("foo"));
|
||||
auto* diagnostic = DiagnosticControl(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "foo");
|
||||
AST().AddDiagnosticControl(diagnostic);
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECT_THAT(AST().GlobalDeclarations(), ElementsAre(var_1, enable, var_2, diagnostic));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_DefaultSeverity) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaDirective) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
|
||||
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaDirective) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaDirective) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
|
||||
|
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaDirective) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaDirective) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
|
||||
|
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaDirective) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_OffViaDirective) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts);
|
||||
|
@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_OffViaDirective) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaAttribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
|
@ -84,7 +83,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaAttribute) {
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaAttribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
|
@ -94,8 +93,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_WarningViaAttribute) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaAttribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
|
@ -105,8 +103,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_InfoViaAttribute) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_OffViaAttribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
|
@ -122,9 +119,9 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnreachableCode_ErrorViaDirective_Overridd
|
|||
// return;
|
||||
// return; // Should produce a warning
|
||||
// }
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kWarning, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
auto stmts = utils::Vector{Return(), Return()};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), stmts, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
|
@ -150,7 +147,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, FunctionAttributeScope) {
|
|||
// }
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(),
|
||||
utils::Vector{
|
||||
Return(),
|
||||
|
@ -167,7 +164,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, FunctionAttributeScope) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
Func("zoo", {}, ty.void_(),
|
||||
utils::Vector{
|
||||
Return(),
|
||||
|
@ -203,7 +200,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, BlockAttributeScope) {
|
|||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
auto attr = [&](auto severity) {
|
||||
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"))};
|
||||
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, "chromium_unreachable_code")};
|
||||
};
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(),
|
||||
utils::Vector{
|
||||
|
@ -243,7 +240,7 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, BlockAttributeScope) {
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnrecognizedRuleName_Directive) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
|
||||
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
|
||||
R"(12:34 warning: unrecognized diagnostic rule 'chromium_unreachable_cod'
|
||||
|
@ -253,7 +250,7 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity')");
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, UnrecognizedRuleName_Attribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
|
||||
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_cod"));
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
|
||||
|
@ -264,17 +261,17 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity')");
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameSameSeverity_Directive) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
Ident(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Directive) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
|
||||
R"(56:78 error: conflicting diagnostic directive
|
||||
|
@ -283,9 +280,9 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Directi
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Directive) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
|
||||
R"(warning: unrecognized diagnostic rule 'chromium_unreachable_codes'
|
||||
|
@ -300,26 +297,26 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity'
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_DifferentUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Directive) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codex"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codex");
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameSameSeverity_Attribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
Ident(Source{{12, 34}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
Ident(Source{{56, 78}}, "chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Attribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
|
||||
|
@ -329,9 +326,9 @@ TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameNameDifferentSeverity_Attribu
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_SameUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Attribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
|
||||
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(r()->Resolve());
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(r()->error(),
|
||||
|
@ -347,9 +344,9 @@ Possible values: 'chromium_unreachable_code', 'derivative_uniformity'
|
|||
|
||||
TEST_F(ResolverDiagnosticControlTest, Conflict_DifferentUnknownNameDifferentSeverity_Attribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr1 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{12, 34}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codes"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codes");
|
||||
auto* attr2 = DiagnosticAttribute(Source{{56, 78}}, ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kOff,
|
||||
Expr("chromium_unreachable_codex"));
|
||||
"chromium_unreachable_codex");
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr1, attr2});
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(r()->Resolve()) << r()->error();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3060,9 +3060,8 @@ sem::Expression* Resolver::UnaryOp(const ast::UnaryOpExpression* unary) {
|
|||
|
||||
bool Resolver::DiagnosticControl(const ast::DiagnosticControl* control) {
|
||||
Mark(control->rule_name);
|
||||
Mark(control->rule_name->identifier);
|
||||
|
||||
auto rule_name = builder_->Symbols().NameFor(control->rule_name->identifier->symbol);
|
||||
auto rule_name = builder_->Symbols().NameFor(control->rule_name->symbol);
|
||||
auto rule = ast::ParseDiagnosticRule(rule_name);
|
||||
if (rule != ast::DiagnosticRule::kUndefined) {
|
||||
validator_.DiagnosticFilters().Set(rule, control->severity);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2452,7 +2452,7 @@ bool Validator::DiagnosticControls(utils::VectorRef<const ast::DiagnosticControl
|
|||
// They conflict if the rule name is the same and the severity is different.
|
||||
utils::Hashmap<Symbol, const ast::DiagnosticControl*, 8> diagnostics;
|
||||
for (auto* dc : controls) {
|
||||
auto diag_added = diagnostics.Add(dc->rule_name->identifier->symbol, dc);
|
||||
auto diag_added = diagnostics.Add(dc->rule_name->symbol, dc);
|
||||
if (!diag_added && (*diag_added.value)->severity != dc->severity) {
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::ostringstream ss;
|
||||
|
@ -2461,8 +2461,8 @@ bool Validator::DiagnosticControls(utils::VectorRef<const ast::DiagnosticControl
|
|||
}
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::ostringstream ss;
|
||||
ss << "severity of '" << symbols_.NameFor(dc->rule_name->identifier->symbol)
|
||||
<< "' set to '" << dc->severity << "' here";
|
||||
ss << "severity of '" << symbols_.NameFor(dc->rule_name->symbol) << "' set to '"
|
||||
<< dc->severity << "' here";
|
||||
AddNote(ss.str(), (*diag_added.value)->source);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ class DiagnosticSeverityTest : public TestHelper {
|
|||
auto block_severity = ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo;
|
||||
auto if_severity = ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kInfo;
|
||||
auto attr = [&](auto severity) {
|
||||
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"))};
|
||||
return utils::Vector{DiagnosticAttribute(severity, "chromium_unreachable_code")};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
auto* return_1 = Return();
|
||||
auto* if_1 = If(Expr(true), Block(utils::Vector{return_1}, attr(if_severity)));
|
||||
auto* block_1 = Block(utils::Vector{if_1}, attr(block_severity));
|
||||
auto* func_attr = DiagnosticAttribute(func_severity, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
auto* func_attr = DiagnosticAttribute(func_severity, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
auto* foo = Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), utils::Vector{block_1}, utils::Vector{func_attr});
|
||||
|
||||
auto* return_2 = Return();
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ class DiagnosticSeverityTest : public TestHelper {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(DiagnosticSeverityTest, WithDirective) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
Run(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ Transform::ApplyResult Renamer::Apply(const Program* src,
|
|||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
[&](const ast::DiagnosticControl* diagnostic) {
|
||||
preserved_identifiers.Add(diagnostic->rule_name->identifier);
|
||||
preserved_identifiers.Add(diagnostic->rule_name);
|
||||
},
|
||||
[&](const ast::TypeName* type_name) {
|
||||
if (is_type_short_name(type_name->name)) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ bool GeneratorImpl::Generate() {
|
|||
bool GeneratorImpl::EmitDiagnosticControl(std::ostream& out,
|
||||
const ast::DiagnosticControl* diagnostic) {
|
||||
out << "diagnostic(" << diagnostic->severity << ", "
|
||||
<< program_->Symbols().NameFor(diagnostic->rule_name->identifier->symbol) << ")";
|
||||
<< program_->Symbols().NameFor(diagnostic->rule_name->symbol) << ")";
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ namespace {
|
|||
using WgslGeneratorImplTest = TestHelper;
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(WgslGeneratorImplTest, Emit_DiagnosticDirective) {
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
DiagnosticDirective(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
|
||||
GeneratorImpl& gen = Build();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -31,8 +31,7 @@ TEST_F(WgslGeneratorImplTest, Emit_DiagnosticDirective) {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_F(WgslGeneratorImplTest, Emit_DiagnosticAttribute) {
|
||||
auto* attr =
|
||||
DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, Expr("chromium_unreachable_code"));
|
||||
auto* attr = DiagnosticAttribute(ast::DiagnosticSeverity::kError, "chromium_unreachable_code");
|
||||
Func("foo", {}, ty.void_(), {}, utils::Vector{attr});
|
||||
|
||||
GeneratorImpl& gen = Build();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue