Arrays can be extremely large, and having the load and store functions unroll the elements can make the complier explode.
Fixed: chromium:1229233
Change-Id: Ieb5654254e16f5ce724a205d21d954ef9a0cd053
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58382
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
CloneContext::Replace(T* what, T* with) is bug-prone, as complex transforms may want to clone `what` multiple times, or not at all. In both cases, this will likely result in an ICE as either the replacement will be reachable multiple times, or not at all.
The CTS test: webgpu:shader,execution,robust_access:linear_memory:storageClass="storage";storageMode="read_write";access="read";atomic=true;baseType="i32"
Was triggering this brokenness with DecomposeMemoryAccess's use of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*).
Switch the usage of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*) to the new function form.
As std::function is copyable, it cannot hold a captured std::unique_ptr.
This prevented the Replace() lambdas from capturing the necessary `BufferAccess` data, as this held a `std::unique_ptr<Offset>`.
To fix this, use a `BlockAllocator` for Offsets, and use raw pointers instead.
Because the function passed to Replace() is called just before the node is cloned, insertion of new functions will occur just before the currently evaluated module-scope entity.
This allows us to remove the "insert_after" arguments to LoadFunc(), StoreFunc(), and AtomicFunc().
We can also kill the icky InsertGlobal() and TypeDeclOf() helpers.
Bug: tint:993
Change-Id: I60972bc13a2fa819a163ee2671f61e82d0e68d2a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58222
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
These indices were a mix of signed and unsigned.
Modulus on the signed integers was producing FXC warnings about performance.
Change-Id: Ib82f4296199a09d2f03be8b06314feefce0022e2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56765
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
For structures and arrays.
This behaves identically to the per-element zero-initialization, but can be significantly less verbose.
Change-Id: I380ef86f16c2b3f37a9de2820e707f368955b761
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56764
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Instead of a ConstantBuffer.
HLSL requires that each structure field in a UBO is 16 byte aligned.
WGSL has much looser constraints with its UBO field alignment rules.
Instead generate an array of uint4 vectors, and index into this, much
like we index into [RW]ByteAddressBuffers for SSBOs.
Extend the DecomposeStorageAccess transform to support uniforms too.
This has been renamed to DecomposeMemoryAccess.
Change-Id: I3868ff80af1ab3b3dddfbf5b969724cb87ef0744
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55246
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Combined with the new PadArrayElements transform, arrays with strides
are now correctly emitted.
Fixed: tint:182
Fixed: tint:895
Change-Id: I26a1be94dee6e4c9d9747c8317a932fc1fb3c810
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54640
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
And fix issues where global variables would not be emitted unless they were transitively referenced by an entry point.
This change requires crbug.com/tint/697 to be fixed before landing.
Change-Id: I712bd9d369e08c9a3cdfb0f114c3609584f91f28
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54241
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
The expected output is far from perfect, and the generated HLSL and MSL
isn't even validated yet, so may be incorrect.
However, by committing the generated output, we get clear examples of
the currently generated output of each backend. As we land fixes and
improvements to each backend, the presubmits will require us to update
the expected test output, and so code reviews will include diffs of
each backend's generated output.
Change-Id: I5c2a9e5b796d0ab75b3ec4c7f8ad00a0a2ab166f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51224
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Ben Clayton