Like 42264, this is an attempt to keep transforms immutable, and to keep mutable I/O information in Data objects.
Bug: tint:389
Change-Id: Ie417872d3e97f3db3904245a30aa74fdcce76610
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/46260
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Remove the decoration groupings (Array, Function, Struct,
StructMember, Type, Variable), such that all *Decoration classes now
subclass ast::Decoration directly. This allows for decorations to be
used in multiple places; for example, builtin decorations are now
valid for both variables and struct members.
Checking that decoration lists only contain decorations that are valid
for the node that they are attached to is now done inside the
validator.
Change-Id: Ie8c0e53e5730a7dedea50a1dec8f26f9e7b00e8d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44320
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
All includes from .cc to .h are preserved, even when transitively included.
It's clear that there are far too many includes in header files, and we should be more aggressive with forward declarations. tint:532 will continue to track this work.
There are, however, plenty of includes that have accumulated over time which are no longer required directly or transitively, so this change starts with a clean slate of *required* includes.
Bug: tint:532
Change-Id: Ie1718dad565f8309fa180ef91bcf3920e76dba18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44042
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
You have to have the CloneContext in order to call ReplaceAll() in the first place. The overhead of capturing the pointer in the closure is negligible.
Cleans up the callsites.
Change-Id: I3a0fd808517d69f19756f590f3426e5ba226c57e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/42840
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Pull the mutable semantic field from ast::Variable and into a new semantic::Variable node.
Have the TypeDeterminer create these semantic::Variable nodes.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: Ia13f5e7b065941ed66ea5a86c6ccb288071feff3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/40063
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
AST nodes are syntax tree nodes, not semantic tree nodes.
The pointsize IdentifierExpression was being created once and used in multiple functions.
The type determiner assumes that expressions are not shared between functions (otherwise the same IdentifierExpression may end up resolving to two different types / semantic nodes based on scope).
Bug: tint:469
Fixed: tint:468
Change-Id: I4c85d25ee3fd333d14739b519d5ee6cda767d52e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/39880
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Program is now immutable*, and remains part of the public Tint
interface.
ProgramBuilder is the mutable builder for Programs, and is not part of
the public Tint interface. ast::Builder has been folded into
ProgramBuilder.
Immutable Programs can be cloned into a mutable ProgramBuilder with
Program::CloneAsBuilder().
Mutable ProgramBuilders can be moved into immutable Programs.
* - mostly immutable. It still has a move constructor and move
assignment operator - required for practical usage - and the
semantic information on AST nodes is still mutable.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: Ia856c50b1880c2f95c91467a9eef5024cbc380c6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38240
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Enforce all places where Dawn passes in or returns a ast::Module, now takes a `const Program* ` or returns a `Program`.
As the end goal of all this is to have immutable Programs, all Program inputs take a pointer instead of moving the actual object.
As consumers of a Program are now all const, we have to const_cast to work around all the places we've been incorrectly mutating a ast::Module.
These const_casts are temporary, and will be fixed in the next set of changes.
Depends on https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/38522
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: Ie05b112b16134937d1b601e9b713ea4ec4e1c677
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38541
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Module will be split into Module (immutable) and ModuleBuilder (mutable).
By moving these methods to the FunctionList, we can deduplicate a bunch of common logic.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I3fd85200aae4e8dc3d5afce8c9aaa6512809a3a0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38363
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
CloneContext clones the AST, types, symbols and in the future semantic info.
3/4 of these are non-ast, so promote these up to the root.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I49619796e6f81f9ab64f79413a12c87312cb1901
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38361
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Despite `tint::ast::type::Type` being in the AST namespace, these classes are clearly not AST nodes:
* They don't derive from ast::Node
* They're deduplicated by the type manager
* None of the types have an Source - they have no lexical declaration point
* The fact we have `ast::Struct` and `ast::type::Struct` clearly demonstrates what is an AST node, and what is a type.
* We have code scattered in the codebase (TypeDeterminer, writers, etc) that create new types after parsing - so clearly not part of the original syntax tree.
Types in tint are closer to being semantic info, but due to the parse-time generation of types, and tight dependency of ast::Nodes to types, I'd be reluctant to class these as semantic info. Instead, put these into a separate root level `tint::type` namespace and `src/tint` directory.
The fact that types exist in the ast::Module has already caused bugs (https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/37261). This is a first step in separating out types from the ast::Module.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I8349bbbd1b19597b8e6d51d5cda0890de46ecaec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38002
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This CL removes the name fields from the various AST nodes now that the
symbols are used everywhere.
Change-Id: I73e8fa8958aa6e6f0159b12b63176b12c418f525
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/36762
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
This CL adds a Symbol to the Variable AST node along side the name. The
name will be removed in a future CL.
Change-Id: I1c05e5595392b1c4a0afa82387d97b2b4472bade
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35881
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
The interface for cloning a module was made significantly more complex in https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35502/ as some of the transforms required constructing symbols before the clone. This was temporary solution in 35502 was to copy the symbol table, then construct the new types, then perform the clone. This lead to a really messy callback interface, that was extremely error prone (e.g. lamda-capturing stack variables from the initializer callback that had been unwound).
Instead, clone the symbols as they're encountered. This may produce an entirely different set of identifiers, but no longer ever-grows the symbol list, and keeps the interface clean.
Bug: tint:396
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I54affd68ac3b730b649af9b47eba685c8a1d784a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35663
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This consistency can be utilized by the ast::Builder to inject the source parameter if it isn't provided.
Bug: tint:396
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I2f19002131e79daae799b8cbe918eb192d6bfc75
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35503
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This CL adds a Symbol to the identifier to represent the name. The name
still exists but will be removed in a future CL when the namers are in
place.
Change-Id: Ic3cc8ad0d99e3bea6eb1ff1ce212e7de67991aec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35460
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Remove all Variable setters (with exception to set_storage_class() which is called by the TypeDeterminer)
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I172667e21e2b02e85dcea6703aa1e608ec718250
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35015
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
set_source() will be removed, so sources will only be specifiable at construction time.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I5c79efd3fa501ebd9308f7f93cfb77bc12198047
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35009
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
instead of transform-in-place.
This is a public API breaking change, so I've added the `DAWN_USE_NEW_TINT_TRANSFORM_API` define which is used by Dawn to know which API to use.
As we're going to have to go through the effort of an API breaking change, use this as an opportunity to rename Transformer to Transform, and remove 'Transform' from each of the transforms themselves (they're already in the transform namespace).
Bug: tint:390
Bug: tint:389
Change-Id: I1017507524b76bb4ffd26b95e550ef53ddc891c9
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34800
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>