Deprecate the old syntax. Migrate everything to the new syntax.
Bug: tint:1382
Change-Id: Ide12b2e927b17dc93b9714c7049090864cc568d3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77260
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Most of this change is fixing up the numerious tests that violated this rule.
Fixed: tint:1365
Issue: tint:1374
Change-Id: I38da27c7367277fe60857208170fec017e80bd25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76400
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Add transform::Unshadow to renamed shadowed symbols. Required by a
number of other transforms.
Replace Resolver symbol resolution with dep-graph.
The dependency graph now performs full symbol resolution before the
regular resolver pass.
Make use of this instead of duplicating the effort.
Simplfies code, and actually performs variable shadowing consistently.
Fixed: tint:819
Bug: tint:1266
Change-Id: I595d1812aebe1d79d2d32e724ff90de36e74cf4b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70523
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
They are always used together, and can actually be simplified when
combined.
This transform cannot currently deal with shadowing, and will need
need to depend on a new 'unshadow' transform.
Fixes a long-standing bug where we'd get an ICE if we attempt to inline
a pointer let declaration with side-effects in a for-loop initializer.
Fixed: tint:1321
Bug: tint:819
Change-Id: I236fed688e33a4996e47310b5ece44c991b5249f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70661
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
