And replace the use of`ast::As(Decoration* deco)` with `Castable::As<T>()`.
These were used for dynamic casting, but is now replaced with Castable.
Change-Id: Ie5fe19ad4db4bc4d19f5386d2cfddaaf84b215d0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34302
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
The hand-rolled `AsBlah()`, `IsBlah()` methods will be migrated in future changes.
Change-Id: I078c100b561b50018771cc38c1cac4379c393424
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34301
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reduces the per-instance size for an extra vtable entry.
Change-Id: Ie087e0b8d8524adf85663ab1224fb0ae1a5e0000
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34300
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Instead of just having a single `DecorationKind` for the first
derivation from `Decoration`, have a `DecorationKind` for every
decoration type.
Add `Decoration::IsKind()` to test whether the decoration is of, or
derives from the given kind.
Note, this change is originally by bclayton@ from
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33201R=bclayton@google.com
Bug: tint:287
Change-Id: I69b51dfaa3f82ef4d61cda383b2f98f401013429
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33280
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is a minimal effort to fix up the code. There's substantial code
cleanup which can now be done, which is done in the next change.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: Iafcf5e814837d9534889e8c21333de4931a19cfa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32864
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
A common base class is required to move from std::unique_ptr<> to raw pointers for AST types.
Also unifies a bunch of similar APIs.
Bug: tint:322
Change-Id: If829f8c3f22069adf62751365f1f1eeb646aba08
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32660
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Once a `Decoration` has been parsed, it'll be placed into a `DecorationList` and validated later in the parse. In order to create error diagnostics that refer back to the decoration, we need to know its source.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: I38de708adbd041601b61d7e0a4d0402e9a2fe526
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31722
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This is the first step in unifying the way decorations are parsed - i.e. instead of parsing decorations in different ways based on the predicted grammar that follows, we can parse decorations blocks in a unified way, then later verify what we have is as expected.
`StructDecoration` has been transformed from an `enum class` to a proper class so it can derive from `Decoration`.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: Iaf12d266068d03edf695acdf2cd21e6cc3ea8eb3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31663
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This CL updates the WGSL parser to allow array decorations to accept
multiple blocks. The stride decoration on arrays was turned into a
proper decoration object instead of just storing the stride directly.
Bug: tint:240
Change-Id: I6cdc7400d8847e3e043b846ea5c9f86cb795cf86
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/29780
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This CL updates to match the spec change allowing multiple struct
decorations.
Bug: tint:240
Change-Id: Id859c6a331c67c46597fc3c70de06d6cc0f486ec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/29260
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Ben Clayton
dan sinclair
Dan Sinclair