This is a major reworking of this transform. The old transform code
was getting unwieldy, with part of the complication coming from the
handling of multiple return statements. By generating a wrapper
function instead, we can avoid a lot of this complexity.
The original entry point function is stripped of all shader IO
attributes (as well as `stage` and `workgroup_size`), but the body is
left unmodified. A new entry point wrapper function is introduced
which calls the original function, packing/unpacking the shader inputs
as necessary, and propagates the result to the corresponding shader
outputs.
The new code has been refactored to use a state object with the
different parts of the transform split into separate functions, which
makes it much more manageable.
Fixed: tint:1076
Bug: tint:920
Change-Id: I3490a0ea7a3509a4e198ce730e476516649d8d96
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60521
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Spread the array zeroing across as many workgroup invocations as possible.
Bug: tint:910
Change-Id: I1cb5a6aaafd2a0a4093ea3b9797c173378bc5605
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60203
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
By generating a helper function for these, we can keep the atomic expression pre-statement-free. This can help prevent for-loops from being transformed into while loops.
Change-Id: Id034ea5ea9be601661ddb78db973015d845c420f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57463
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
By generating a helper function for these, we can keep the atomic expression pre-statement-free. This can help prevent for-loops from being transformed into while loops, which can upset FXC.
We can't do the same for workgroup storage atomics, as the InterlockedXXX() methods have the workgroup-storage expression as the first argument, and I'm not aware of any way to make a user-declared parameter be `groupshared`.
Change-Id: I8669127a58dc9cae95ce316523029064b5c9b5fa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57462
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Common logic between the HLSL, WGSL and MSL writers has been moved into
the TextGenerator base class.
Fixed: tint:892
Change-Id: I0f469516947fe64817ce6251e436da74e5e176e8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56068
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Zero the workgroup memory for all backends.
We can probably disable this for the backends that support workgroup zeroing, but that's an optimization we can perform later.
Fixed: tint:280
Change-Id: I9cad919ba3a15b8cedfe6939317d1f6b95425453
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55244
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Storage buffers are emitted as `ByteAddressBuffer`s in HLSL, so we have to jump through hoops to support atomic ops on storage buffer atomics.
Workgroup atomics are far more conventional, but very little code can be shared between these two code paths.
Bug: tint:892
Change-Id: If10ea866e3b67a093e87aca689d34065fd49b705
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54651
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
James Price
Ben Clayton
Sarah