This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This also completes the work to resolve the access controls for each
storage type.
Fixed: tint:846
Change-Id: Iab24057ec14620a2978ec63c4a91ba12d1bc6e9b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53381
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Add more E2E tests to cover pointers with different storage classes.
Fixed: tint:815
Change-Id: I224a794cdf60648ce71dc9a0922d489542995be1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51404
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>