For these tests, we only really care that we can successfully consume
them and generate valid output for each backend. Having the expected
files in the tree generates significant churn for any change to how we
generate backend code, which makes it hard to inspect diffs.
Change-Id: Ic98c248081144c0fb1791f1303eaf6d459548e3d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62720
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
MSL vectors with other widths already match WGSL's rules for alignment
and size.
Change-Id: I237052372463ea8323eab47c3b4ca90c6d8afcc3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62600
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Remap all resources into a flat namespace, to allow tests to pass when
multiple resources use the same binding number.
Fixed: tint:959
Change-Id: I58ed07c789e1ea90fc370ceba73b9d8292902549
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/61261
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This reverts commit e5dbe24e94.
Reason for revert: Makes the Tint-Dawn roll fails because of
MSL compilation errors on as_type<uint>(-2147483648):
as_type cast from 'long' to 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') is not allowed
as_type<uint>(-2147483647) compiles fine, so this is most
likely because the MSL compiler types the literal as a long
(since without the - it is larger than the max int32).
Original change's description:
> MSL writer: make signed int overflow defined behaviour
>
> Bug: tint:124
> Change-Id: Icf545b633d6390ceb7f639e80111390005e311a1
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60100
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
TBR=dneto@google.com,bclayton@google.com,jrprice@google.com,amaiorano@google.com,noreply+kokoro@google.com,tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I3e3384a9185013bb141a1b7b9b22bad8571bbc50
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: tint:124
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60345
Reviewed-by: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways:
When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s
§ 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then:
- The break statement must appear as either:
- The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has:
- no else clause or an empty else clause
- no elseif clauses
- The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an
empty if clause and no elseif clauses.
- That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause.
By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and
back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL
to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being
the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the
other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That
OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an
unconditional backedge.
Avoids errors like this:
continue construct with the continue target X is not
post dominated by the back-edge block Y
Fixed: 1034
Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit
571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was
followed:
- Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were
identified
- All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and
converted into SPIR-V binaries
- The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary
- Duplicate binaries were removed
- spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining
binary, with duplicates discarded
- Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target
environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded
- Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were
put aside for further investigation
- SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in
this CL
- test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to
generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these
SPIR-V assembly tests
- Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL
again, as a WGLSL test
- test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again,
to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests
Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
James Price
Antonio Maiorano
Corentin Wallez
David Neto
Alastair Donaldson