We've decided that these will be omitted for now.
Move the check-spec-examples script into the tools/src directory, and update the go modules.
Add a bash script to build and run this.
Change-Id: I852f8ddb1b9b987410a2a49cf6d14e54c3cf3f0e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56381
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
TypeDecls (alias, structure) are not a types - they declare types.
ast::TypeName is what's used for a ast::Type.
Previously we were trying to automatically convert these to TypeNames in the builder, but having these inherit from ast::Type was extremely error prone.
reader/spirv was actually constructing ast::Structs and using them as types, which is invalid.
Change-Id: I05773ad6d488626606019015b84217a5a55a8e8a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53802
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Combines the calls to ty.alias() and AST().AddConstructedType()
Change-Id: I84eaf6275d37141cf8973db7e04d25d9cb9c6351
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53801
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Add a Resolver::IsPlain() method to check for plain types, which is
then used instead of IsStorable() for validating array and struct
subtypes.
Remove validation of assignment and constructor RHS types, instead
validating the type of the variable declaration. This catches
additional errors that were previously missed, such as using a pointer
for a var declaration with no constructor.
Change-Id: I5786a262159d2a42cc05b44743c6c26f6b5647c0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53960
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The tests that were in ptr_ref_* should have been in var_let_*. Move these to the right place, and add more tests that actually test the pointer access.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: I383fcbf7eeb4a1428cf50c52bc2958720458adcb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53388
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This also completes the work to resolve the access controls for each
storage type.
Fixed: tint:846
Change-Id: Iab24057ec14620a2978ec63c4a91ba12d1bc6e9b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53381
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This change implements pointers and references as described by the WGSL
specification change in https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1569.
reader/spirv:
* Now emits address-of `&expr` and indirection `*expr` operators as
needed.
* As an identifier may now resolve to a pointer or reference type
depending on whether the declaration is a `var`, `let` or
parameter, `Function::identifier_values_` has been changed from
an ID set to an ID -> Type* map.
resolver:
* Now correctly resolves all expressions to either a value type,
reference type or pointer type.
* Validates pointer / reference rules on assignment, `var` and `let`
construction, and usage.
* Handles the address-of and indirection operators.
* No longer does any implicit loads of pointer types.
* Storage class validation is still TODO (crbug.com/tint/809)
writer/spirv:
* Correctly handles variables and expressions of pointer and
reference types, emitting OpLoads where necessary.
test:
* Lots of new test cases
Fixed: tint:727
Change-Id: I77d3281590e35e5a3122f5b74cdeb71a6fe51f74
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50740
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>