Now that I've landed this change to Dawn to disable FXC optimizations:
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70700,, we can reland this
change. The Tint-into-Dawn roll was failing because FXC would miscompile
certain loops into infinite loops when not unrolled.
Also reland
test/bug/fxc/gradient_in_varying_loop/1112.wgsl.expected.hlsl
Bug: tint:1112
Bug: dawn:1203
Change-Id: I641d68864b833e0fbe3b117d397b89ae96482536
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71000
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This reverts commit 11d09f2fe7.
Reason for revert: Failing roll of Tint to Dawn: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70100
Original change's description:
> HLSL: force FXC to never unroll loops
>
> Emit the "[loop]" attribute on "for" and "while" so that FXC does not
> attempt to unroll them. This is to work around an FXC bug where it fails
> to unroll loops with gradient operations.
>
> FXC ostensibly unrolls such loops because gradient operations require
> uniform control flow, and loops that have varying iterations may
> possibly not be uniform. Tint will eventually validate that control flow
> is indeed uniform, so forcing FXC to avoid unrolling in these cases
> should be fine.
>
> Bug: tint:1112
> Change-Id: I10077f8b62fbbb230a0003f3864c75a8fe0e1d18
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69880
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: I8e8f3c0abfa6e6bc5d0e67af9428a46ef867d5c1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70540
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Emit the "[loop]" attribute on "for" and "while" so that FXC does not
attempt to unroll them. This is to work around an FXC bug where it fails
to unroll loops with gradient operations.
FXC ostensibly unrolls such loops because gradient operations require
uniform control flow, and loops that have varying iterations may
possibly not be uniform. Tint will eventually validate that control flow
is indeed uniform, so forcing FXC to avoid unrolling in these cases
should be fine.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: I10077f8b62fbbb230a0003f3864c75a8fe0e1d18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69880
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This is a major reworking of this transform. The old transform code
was getting unwieldy, with part of the complication coming from the
handling of multiple return statements. By generating a wrapper
function instead, we can avoid a lot of this complexity.
The original entry point function is stripped of all shader IO
attributes (as well as `stage` and `workgroup_size`), but the body is
left unmodified. A new entry point wrapper function is introduced
which calls the original function, packing/unpacking the shader inputs
as necessary, and propagates the result to the corresponding shader
outputs.
The new code has been refactored to use a state object with the
different parts of the transform split into separate functions, which
makes it much more manageable.
Fixed: tint:1076
Bug: tint:920
Change-Id: I3490a0ea7a3509a4e198ce730e476516649d8d96
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60521
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Arrays can be extremely large, and having the load and store functions unroll the elements can make the complier explode.
Fixed: chromium:1229233
Change-Id: Ieb5654254e16f5ce724a205d21d954ef9a0cd053
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58382
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
CloneContext::Replace(T* what, T* with) is bug-prone, as complex transforms may want to clone `what` multiple times, or not at all. In both cases, this will likely result in an ICE as either the replacement will be reachable multiple times, or not at all.
The CTS test: webgpu:shader,execution,robust_access:linear_memory:storageClass="storage";storageMode="read_write";access="read";atomic=true;baseType="i32"
Was triggering this brokenness with DecomposeMemoryAccess's use of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*).
Switch the usage of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*) to the new function form.
As std::function is copyable, it cannot hold a captured std::unique_ptr.
This prevented the Replace() lambdas from capturing the necessary `BufferAccess` data, as this held a `std::unique_ptr<Offset>`.
To fix this, use a `BlockAllocator` for Offsets, and use raw pointers instead.
Because the function passed to Replace() is called just before the node is cloned, insertion of new functions will occur just before the currently evaluated module-scope entity.
This allows us to remove the "insert_after" arguments to LoadFunc(), StoreFunc(), and AtomicFunc().
We can also kill the icky InsertGlobal() and TypeDeclOf() helpers.
Bug: tint:993
Change-Id: I60972bc13a2fa819a163ee2671f61e82d0e68d2a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58222
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Use the new semantic constant value information to significantly reduce the complex indexing logic emitted for UBO accesses.
This will dramatically reduce the number of `for` loops that are decayed to `while` loops.
Change-Id: I1b0adb5edde2b4ed39c6beafc2e28106b86e0edd
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57701
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Antonio Maiorano
James Price
Ben Clayton