Check that pre-clone objects are owned by the source program.
Check that post-clone object are owned by the target builder.
Fixed: tint:469
Change-Id: Idd0eeb8dfb386e295b66b4b6621cc13dc1a30786
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48260
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Assert in each AST constructor that child nodes belong to the program of the parent.
Bug: tint:709
Change-Id: Icc89b69691d099e358ff632a0ca6fd7943cb0193
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47623
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This will be used to detect accidental leaks of program objects between programs.
Bug: tint:709
Change-Id: I20f784a2c673d19a04a880b3ec91dfe2eb743bdb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47622
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
The readers must not produce invalid ASTs.
If readers cannot produce a valid AST, then they should error instead.
If a reader does produce an invalid AST, this change catches this bad behavior early, significantly helping identify the root of the broken logic.
IsValid() made a bit more sense in the days where the AST was mutable, and was constructed by calling setters on the nodes to build up the tree.
In order to detect bad ASTs, IsValid() would have to perform an entire AST traversal and give a yes / no answer for the entire tree. Not only was this slow, an answer of 'no' didn't tell you *where* the AST was invalid, resulting in a lot of manual debugging.
Now that the AST is fully immutable, all child nodes need to be built before their parents. The AST node constructors now become a perfect place to perform pointer sanity checking.
The argument for attempting to catch and handle invalid ASTs is not a compelling one.
Invalid ASTs are invalid compiler behavior, not something that should ever happen with a correctly functioning compiler.
If this were to happen in production, the user would be utterly clueless to _why_ the program is invalid, or _how_ to fix it.
Attempting to handle invalid ASTs is just masking a much larger problem.
Let's just let the fuzzers do their job to catch any of these cases early.
Fixed: chromium:1185569
Change-Id: I6496426a3a9da9d42627d2c1ca23917bfd04cc5c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44048
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
All includes from .cc to .h are preserved, even when transitively included.
It's clear that there are far too many includes in header files, and we should be more aggressive with forward declarations. tint:532 will continue to track this work.
There are, however, plenty of includes that have accumulated over time which are no longer required directly or transitively, so this change starts with a clean slate of *required* includes.
Bug: tint:532
Change-Id: Ie1718dad565f8309fa180ef91bcf3920e76dba18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44042
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
The CloneContext was previously dealing with pointers to CastableBase, which has no guarantees that the object was actually cloneable.
Add a Cloneable base class that CloneContext can use instead.
Improves readability and produces cleaner compiler errors if you try to clone a non-cloneable object.
Change-Id: I4352fc5dab3da434e4ab160a54c4c82d50e427b4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/41722
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Semantic info is no longer part of the ast, so it is now odd to mention semantic info on a clone method for the AST.
Improve the documentation around cloning on the Program methods and the CloneContext.
Change-Id: Ib1cf255acfd994521aaa5add2789e5117db6b072
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/41548
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Will hold the mutable fields that currently reside in the otherwise immutable-AST.
Change the AST string methods to accept a `const semantic::Info&`. This is required as some nodes include type-resolved information in their output strings.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: Iba494a9c5645ce2096da0a8cfe63a4309a9d9c3c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/39003
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Enforce all places where Dawn passes in or returns a ast::Module, now takes a `const Program* ` or returns a `Program`.
As the end goal of all this is to have immutable Programs, all Program inputs take a pointer instead of moving the actual object.
As consumers of a Program are now all const, we have to const_cast to work around all the places we've been incorrectly mutating a ast::Module.
These const_casts are temporary, and will be fixed in the next set of changes.
Depends on https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/38522
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: Ie05b112b16134937d1b601e9b713ea4ec4e1c677
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38541
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
CloneContext clones the AST, types, symbols and in the future semantic info.
3/4 of these are non-ast, so promote these up to the root.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I49619796e6f81f9ab64f79413a12c87312cb1901
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38361
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Despite `tint::ast::type::Type` being in the AST namespace, these classes are clearly not AST nodes:
* They don't derive from ast::Node
* They're deduplicated by the type manager
* None of the types have an Source - they have no lexical declaration point
* The fact we have `ast::Struct` and `ast::type::Struct` clearly demonstrates what is an AST node, and what is a type.
* We have code scattered in the codebase (TypeDeterminer, writers, etc) that create new types after parsing - so clearly not part of the original syntax tree.
Types in tint are closer to being semantic info, but due to the parse-time generation of types, and tight dependency of ast::Nodes to types, I'd be reluctant to class these as semantic info. Instead, put these into a separate root level `tint::type` namespace and `src/tint` directory.
The fact that types exist in the ast::Module has already caused bugs (https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/37261). This is a first step in separating out types from the ast::Module.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I8349bbbd1b19597b8e6d51d5cda0890de46ecaec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38002
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Annotate those that are set by the TypeDeterminer as "Semantic Info"
Bug: tint:396
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I0705c64e8e23d97a6430230728f82e64dd92efb7
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35165
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
All nodes that don't have a Source constructor will need to have one added.
We can then find all missing Source mappings with a search for `Source{}`
Bug: tint:396
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I06f9689d4da0f3fd1bd757c7358dcc65f15dc752
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/35018
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
We've been using |blah| in various places to markup code, however this is not doxygen markup. So instead:
* If the code links to a parameter, use `blah`.
* If the code links to a member field, use #blah.
* If the code links to a method use blah().
* If the code is somewhere unlinkable use `blah`.
Change-Id: Idac748a4c2531b5bae77e1a335e3d3ef6fab48b6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33787
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Deep-clones all `Node`s and `Type`s into a new module.
Instead of writing a million standalone tests that'll only ever test the
existing fields of each type, I've opted to write the tests using
wgsl<->ast<->wgsl conversion. This means the tests require the enabling
of TINT_BUILD_WGSL_READER and TINT_BUILD_WGSL_WRITER, but I believe this
is much easier to maintain.
I'm aware there are probably gaps in the tests, and that even full
coverage is likely to rapidly rot, so I've also added
fuzzers/tint_ast_clone_fuzzer.cc - a fuzzer based test that ensures that
all AST modules can be cloned with identical reproduction.
I've run this across 100 cores of a 3990x for 4 hours, fixing the
single issue it detected.
Note: Expressions do not currently clone their `TypeManager` determined
types. This is for two reasons:
(a) This initial CL is mahoosive enough.
(b) I'm uncertain whether we actually want to clone this info, or to
re-run the `TypeDeterminer` after each AST transform. Maybe it should
be optional. Time will tell.
Fixed: tint:307
Change-Id: Id90fab06aaa740c805d12b66f3f11d1f452c6805
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33300
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
The hand-rolled `AsBlah()`, `IsBlah()` methods will be migrated in future changes.
Change-Id: I078c100b561b50018771cc38c1cac4379c393424
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34301
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This CL adds the result_type type_name into the AST dump if available.
Bug: tint:310, tint:308
Change-Id: Iea678fd4f7a2dadbfca86f29043c75459c421cb3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/32780
Reviewed-by: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Use `source().range.begin.line` and `source().range.begin.column` instead.
Bug: tint:282
Change-Id: I6c9bf8766d6db2c9d8e7e1b8bafb2eea93e065d8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31441
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This is the first step in improving the error messages produced while parsing.
The `line` and `column` information of `Source` has been moved to `Source::Location`.
`Source::Range` has been added that contains a `Location` interval - allowing error messages to highlight the full region of the error.
The `File` information provides an optional file path, and pre-splits the content into lines. These lines can be used to print the full line containing an error.
This CL contains a few temporary changes that help split up this work, and to ease integration with Tint.
Bug: tint:282
Change-Id: I7aa501b0a9631f286e8e93fd7396bdbe38175727
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31420
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This CL suppresses some Doxygen warnings for code doxygen doesn't
process correctly and adds the missing return for GenerateEntryPoint
method.
Change-Id: If97443a7177caa51c1054de83fb0711692a7ab22
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/29461
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Ben Clayton
Antonio Maiorano
dan sinclair
dan sinclair
Dan Sinclair