TypeDecls (alias, structure) are not a types - they declare types.
ast::TypeName is what's used for a ast::Type.
Previously we were trying to automatically convert these to TypeNames in the builder, but having these inherit from ast::Type was extremely error prone.
reader/spirv was actually constructing ast::Structs and using them as types, which is invalid.
Change-Id: I05773ad6d488626606019015b84217a5a55a8e8a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53802
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Combines the calls to ty.alias() and AST().AddConstructedType()
Change-Id: I84eaf6275d37141cf8973db7e04d25d9cb9c6351
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53801
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
and allow them in any order.
We're about to add Yet Another optional parameter - access control.
For style, we probably want this field before the decorations, however
that means adding more default values for all the cases where we don't
need to specify the access control.
Instead use some template magic to allow extra parameters to be
specified in any order, and entirely optional, with sensible defaults.
This keeps things readable and without huge code refactorings.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: I4f61eb765de63ad98ae786d187d2bd1b42942756
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53087
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
In preparation for implementing
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/1604, this change removes the
sem::AccessControl node. Instead, the ast::AccessControl::Access enum is
now on the sem::StorageTexture class, as well as on sem::Variable. For
sem::Variable, the field is set when the variable's type is either a
storage buffer or a storage texture.
Bug: tint:802
Change-Id: Id479af36b401d067b015027923f4e715f5f69f25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51020
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
To declare a local variable, we write `var name : type`, not `var<function> name : type`.
This change fixes all the places where we were feeding StorageClass::kFunction into variable declarations.
Note that the resolved, semantic variable correctly infers the `kFunction` StorageClass.
Change-Id: I6221fabae1de0435044f29b9a91808421d5cace6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50821
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Validate that:
* That resource variables have resource bindings
* Only resource variables have resource bindings
* That a [[binding]] decoration is paired with a [[group]]
* That binding points are not reused in the same entry point
Fixed: tint:235
Fixed: tint:645
Bug: tint:645
Change-Id: I2542934b4c6a2b4bbde48242932c04c796033a90
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50500
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
With the parsers now using ast::Types, nothing should be producing these any more.
This change also removes Resolver::Canonical(), which is now unneeded as there are no sem::Aliases to remove.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I0c1a49f49372c1fcc37864502f07c5c76328d471
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50304
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
There's now no need to have both.
Removes a whole bunch of Sem().Get() smell, and simplifies the resolver.
Also fixes a long-standing issue where an array with an explicit, but equal-to-implicit-stride attribute would result in a different type to an array without the decoration.
Bug: tint:724
Fixed: tint:782
Change-Id: I0202459009cd45be427cdb621993a5a3b07ff51e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50301
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
There's now no need to have both.
Removes a whole bunch of Sem().Get() smell, and simplifies the resolver.
Bug: tint:724
Fixed: tint:761
Change-Id: I756a32680ac52441fd6eebf6fc53dd507ef5e538
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49961
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Register all aliases, and don't share type nodes
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I7ac20c8a75f232fa7fe1e8c1a5690f411888f6e4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49750
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Used as a stepping stone to emitting the ast::Types instead.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: Ib2d6c150fe8aa7c1e2c502676922b14b1518a4be
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48686
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Used as a stepping stone to emitting the ast::Types instead.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: Idadb7d8b5d6fce1d898127675442221de07a633d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48685
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Fixed: tint:94
Change-Id: I1d3e512c030ec16031b8c8fcfbde0cd1db5d1ea4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48380
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#variable-declaration
Variables in the storage storage class and variables with a storage
texture type must have an access attribute applied to the store type.
https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#module-scope-variables
A variable in the storage storage class is a storage buffer variable. Its
store type must be a host-shareable structure type with block attribute,
satisfying the storage class constraints.
Fixup tests, including those that were producing warnings about `var <in>`
The WGSL writer seems to want to put a newline after every decoration block, leading to some ugly output. I'll fix this as a separate change.
Fixes: tint:531
Fixes: tint:692
Change-Id: If09d987477247ab4a7c635f6ee6e616a06061515
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47763
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Fix some SPIR-V tests that were wrongly expecting parameters to be
loaded from memory as a result of them not being const.
Change-Id: Ieab6f1edd4a4ba6efd226fe190e7a49b309048c5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47281
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This will be used to validate layout rules, as well as preventing
illegal types from being used in a uniform / storage buffer.
Also: Cleanup logic around VariableDeclStatement
This was spread across 3 places, entirely unnecessarily.
Bug: tint:643
Change-Id: I9d309c3a5dfb5676984f49ce51763a97bcac93bb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/45125
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Ben Clayton
Antonio Maiorano
James Price