Change ast::Array to use an ast::Expression for its `size` field. The
WGSL frontend now parses the array size as an `primary_expression`,
and the Resolver is responsible for validating the expression is a
signed or unsigned integer, and either a literal or a non-overridable
module-scope constant.
The Resolver evaluates the constant value of the size expression, and
so the resolved sem::Array type still has a constant size as before.
Fixed: tint:1068
Fixed: tint:1117
Change-Id: Icfa141482ea1e47ea8c21a25e9eb48221f176e9a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/63061
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The storage type of an assignment has to be constructible, which
prevents stores to atomic or runtime-sized array types.
Change-Id: Ie7bb703bb4c6953a4ddf0286f39d0d3e17b5b1d2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/61801
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
TypeDecls (alias, structure) are not a types - they declare types.
ast::TypeName is what's used for a ast::Type.
Previously we were trying to automatically convert these to TypeNames in the builder, but having these inherit from ast::Type was extremely error prone.
reader/spirv was actually constructing ast::Structs and using them as types, which is invalid.
Change-Id: I05773ad6d488626606019015b84217a5a55a8e8a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53802
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Combines the calls to ty.alias() and AST().AddConstructedType()
Change-Id: I84eaf6275d37141cf8973db7e04d25d9cb9c6351
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53801
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Add a Resolver::IsPlain() method to check for plain types, which is
then used instead of IsStorable() for validating array and struct
subtypes.
Remove validation of assignment and constructor RHS types, instead
validating the type of the variable declaration. This catches
additional errors that were previously missed, such as using a pointer
for a var declaration with no constructor.
Change-Id: I5786a262159d2a42cc05b44743c6c26f6b5647c0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53960
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
and allow them in any order.
We're about to add Yet Another optional parameter - access control.
For style, we probably want this field before the decorations, however
that means adding more default values for all the cases where we don't
need to specify the access control.
Instead use some template magic to allow extra parameters to be
specified in any order, and entirely optional, with sensible defaults.
This keeps things readable and without huge code refactorings.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: I4f61eb765de63ad98ae786d187d2bd1b42942756
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53087
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
You've helped us bridge two worlds.
Good Night, Sweet Prince.
Fixed: tint:724
Change-Id: I0b4ba960e9cf5dcff7df9d2f332ea36d6663c440
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51667
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This change implements pointers and references as described by the WGSL
specification change in https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1569.
reader/spirv:
* Now emits address-of `&expr` and indirection `*expr` operators as
needed.
* As an identifier may now resolve to a pointer or reference type
depending on whether the declaration is a `var`, `let` or
parameter, `Function::identifier_values_` has been changed from
an ID set to an ID -> Type* map.
resolver:
* Now correctly resolves all expressions to either a value type,
reference type or pointer type.
* Validates pointer / reference rules on assignment, `var` and `let`
construction, and usage.
* Handles the address-of and indirection operators.
* No longer does any implicit loads of pointer types.
* Storage class validation is still TODO (crbug.com/tint/809)
writer/spirv:
* Correctly handles variables and expressions of pointer and
reference types, emitting OpLoads where necessary.
test:
* Lots of new test cases
Fixed: tint:727
Change-Id: I77d3281590e35e5a3122f5b74cdeb71a6fe51f74
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50740
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
In preparation for implementing
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/1604, this change removes the
sem::AccessControl node. Instead, the ast::AccessControl::Access enum is
now on the sem::StorageTexture class, as well as on sem::Variable. For
sem::Variable, the field is set when the variable's type is either a
storage buffer or a storage texture.
Bug: tint:802
Change-Id: Id479af36b401d067b015027923f4e715f5f69f25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51020
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Validate that:
* That resource variables have resource bindings
* Only resource variables have resource bindings
* That a [[binding]] decoration is paired with a [[group]]
* That binding points are not reused in the same entry point
Fixed: tint:235
Fixed: tint:645
Bug: tint:645
Change-Id: I2542934b4c6a2b4bbde48242932c04c796033a90
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50500
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
We don't want the WGSL parser to have to maintain type lookups.
If the WGSL language is updated to allow module-scope variables to be declared in any order, then the single-pass approach is going to fail horribly.
Instead do the check in the Resovler.
With this change, the AST nodes actually contain the correctly declared storage class.
Fix up the SPIR-V reader to generate StorageClass::kNone for handle types.
Fix all tests.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I102e30c9bbef32de40e123c2676ea9a281dee74d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50306
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
With the parsers now using ast::Types, nothing should be producing these any more.
This change also removes Resolver::Canonical(), which is now unneeded as there are no sem::Aliases to remove.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I0c1a49f49372c1fcc37864502f07c5c76328d471
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50304
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Register all aliases, and don't share type nodes
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I7ac20c8a75f232fa7fe1e8c1a5690f411888f6e4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49750
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Used as a stepping stone to emitting the ast::Types instead.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: Ib2d6c150fe8aa7c1e2c502676922b14b1518a4be
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48686
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
A general code cleanup
Change-Id: Ib251ca2d4b71f75736bdba8b4255965593a76c31
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48680
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Not currently called (nothing currently attaches ast::Type nodes to the AST), but implements some of the boilerplate that'll be shortly required.
This change also removes a bunch of duplicated enumerators from the sem namespace for their counterpart in the ast namespace.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I0372a9f4eca2f9357ff161e7ec1b67eae1c4c8f6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48603
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Moved tests and fixed now broken tests.
Bug: tint:642
Change-Id: Iaa4483abde101f3963ca20e51c1069b2d64bbb5c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/46661
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
* With this change, ProgramBuilder::WrapInStatement(expr), which
produced an "expr = expr" assignment expression, would fail validation
in some cases like for call expressions. Replaced this with a
declaration of a variable with type inferred from expr.
* Moved existing validation tests to resolver\assignment_validation.cc,
and added missing tests: AssignFromPointer_Fail.
* Fixed broken tests as a result of this change.
Bug: tint:642
Change-Id: I6a738b67edb0e116a46e936d652c2dcb4389281e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/46161
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This performs very basic type verification for assignments and variable initializers.
Pulls part of the validation logic out of the Validator into the Resolver.
Involves fixing up a bunch of broken tests.
Bug: tint:642
Fixed: tint:631
Change-Id: Ifbdc139ff7eeab810856e0ba9e3c380c6555ec20
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/45281
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
