These are no longer necessary and will soon be deprecated and removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I3fa076e7ce5eb36466d24c80fd1c83658c28c5ab
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72086
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
WGSL does not support pointer-to-vector-component, so the SPIR-V
reader needs to sink these pointers into their use.
Bug: tint:491
Change-Id: Ib5ae87d2f6bbac13280314ba11369d7ced505b56
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68241
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Change ast::Array to use an ast::Expression for its `size` field. The
WGSL frontend now parses the array size as an `primary_expression`,
and the Resolver is responsible for validating the expression is a
signed or unsigned integer, and either a literal or a non-overridable
module-scope constant.
The Resolver evaluates the constant value of the size expression, and
so the resolved sem::Array type still has a constant size as before.
Fixed: tint:1068
Fixed: tint:1117
Change-Id: Icfa141482ea1e47ea8c21a25e9eb48221f176e9a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/63061
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
- When storing to sample_mask output, write to the 0th element
- Only make a return struct if it has members
- Adjust type signedness coercion when loading special builtins.
- Adapt tests
- Update expectations for end-to-end tests
- Handle sample_mask with stride
Input variables normally don't have layout. But they can have it
up through SPIR-V 1.4.
Handle this case in the SPIR-V reader, by seeing through the
intermediate alias type created for the strided array type.
Bug: tint:508
Change-Id: I0f19dc1305d3f250dbbc0698a602288c34245274
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54743
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This change implements pointers and references as described by the WGSL
specification change in https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1569.
reader/spirv:
* Now emits address-of `&expr` and indirection `*expr` operators as
needed.
* As an identifier may now resolve to a pointer or reference type
depending on whether the declaration is a `var`, `let` or
parameter, `Function::identifier_values_` has been changed from
an ID set to an ID -> Type* map.
resolver:
* Now correctly resolves all expressions to either a value type,
reference type or pointer type.
* Validates pointer / reference rules on assignment, `var` and `let`
construction, and usage.
* Handles the address-of and indirection operators.
* No longer does any implicit loads of pointer types.
* Storage class validation is still TODO (crbug.com/tint/809)
writer/spirv:
* Correctly handles variables and expressions of pointer and
reference types, emitting OpLoads where necessary.
test:
* Lots of new test cases
Fixed: tint:727
Change-Id: I77d3281590e35e5a3122f5b74cdeb71a6fe51f74
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50740
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
The expected output is far from perfect, and the generated HLSL and MSL
isn't even validated yet, so may be incorrect.
However, by committing the generated output, we get clear examples of
the currently generated output of each backend. As we land fixes and
improvements to each backend, the presubmits will require us to update
the expected test output, and so code reviews will include diffs of
each backend's generated output.
Change-Id: I5c2a9e5b796d0ab75b3ec4c7f8ad00a0a2ab166f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51224
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>