Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This provides much more complete coverage than what we have in the
unit tests. We now test:
- All builtins, for all stages, both struct and non-struct
- Multiple location attributes for vertex and fragment stages, both
struct and non-struct
- Mixing builtins and location attributes, whilst mixing struct and
non-struct
- A few "interesting" cases of IO structs being shared between
different functions, stages, and with an SSBO variable
There are 7 skipped tests for MSL due to two different MSL bugs which
will be fixed in upcoming patches.
Change-Id: I8b802591762c8ff018e01bf37838551e353162b1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53120
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Ben Clayton
James Price