By generating a helper function for these, we can keep the atomic expression pre-statement-free. This can help prevent for-loops from being transformed into while loops, which can upset FXC.
We can't do the same for workgroup storage atomics, as the InterlockedXXX() methods have the workgroup-storage expression as the first argument, and I'm not aware of any way to make a user-declared parameter be `groupshared`.
Change-Id: I8669127a58dc9cae95ce316523029064b5c9b5fa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57462
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Storage buffers are emitted as `ByteAddressBuffer`s in HLSL, so we have to jump through hoops to support atomic ops on storage buffer atomics.
Workgroup atomics are far more conventional, but very little code can be shared between these two code paths.
Bug: tint:892
Change-Id: If10ea866e3b67a093e87aca689d34065fd49b705
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54651
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Ben Clayton