This also completes the work to resolve the access controls for each
storage type.
Fixed: tint:846
Change-Id: Iab24057ec14620a2978ec63c4a91ba12d1bc6e9b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53381
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This allows them to be used in various places that WGSL allows, such
as function return types and parameters, and as the type of the RHS of
an assignment.
Fixed: tint:814
Fixed: tint:820
Change-Id: Idb6a901b9a34e96bb9733cc158191e7b3bafaa0e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/52844
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Pull the HLSL transformation out to a standalone transform that can be
used by both HLSL and MSL.
The new E2E tests do not yet pass for MSL because they produce array
assignments, which will be addressed in the next patch.
Fixed: tint:826
Change-Id: Idc27c81ad45e3d4ab96d82663927d2fc1384618e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/52842
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Ben Clayton
James Price