Deprecate the old syntax. Migrate everything to the new syntax.
Bug: tint:1382
Change-Id: Ide12b2e927b17dc93b9714c7049090864cc568d3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77260
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
In an attempt to better follow the guidelines in docs/end-to-end-tests.md.
Change-Id: Id012004e8a376598bb69cf364ca7ca0735632a2e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69342
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This forbids let declarations from having handle types.
Change-Id: I6f7467b0fa3963711ec705e1a81bfdd2c550feee
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59801
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
A hypothetical case discussed in the WG call, which I wasn't entirely sure was going to work. It does.
Change-Id: I855f1e02af2fe62214e3fb964f6937e3d88016eb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59021
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>