In preparation for implementing
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/1604, this change removes the
sem::AccessControl node. Instead, the ast::AccessControl::Access enum is
now on the sem::StorageTexture class, as well as on sem::Variable. For
sem::Variable, the field is set when the variable's type is either a
storage buffer or a storage texture.
Bug: tint:802
Change-Id: Id479af36b401d067b015027923f4e715f5f69f25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51020
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
To declare a local variable, we write `var name : type`, not `var<function> name : type`.
This change fixes all the places where we were feeding StorageClass::kFunction into variable declarations.
Note that the resolved, semantic variable correctly infers the `kFunction` StorageClass.
Change-Id: I6221fabae1de0435044f29b9a91808421d5cace6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50821
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Validate that:
* That resource variables have resource bindings
* Only resource variables have resource bindings
* That a [[binding]] decoration is paired with a [[group]]
* That binding points are not reused in the same entry point
Fixed: tint:235
Fixed: tint:645
Bug: tint:645
Change-Id: I2542934b4c6a2b4bbde48242932c04c796033a90
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50500
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
With the parsers now using ast::Types, nothing should be producing these any more.
This change also removes Resolver::Canonical(), which is now unneeded as there are no sem::Aliases to remove.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I0c1a49f49372c1fcc37864502f07c5c76328d471
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50304
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
There's now no need to have both.
Removes a whole bunch of Sem().Get() smell, and simplifies the resolver.
Also fixes a long-standing issue where an array with an explicit, but equal-to-implicit-stride attribute would result in a different type to an array without the decoration.
Bug: tint:724
Fixed: tint:782
Change-Id: I0202459009cd45be427cdb621993a5a3b07ff51e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50301
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
There's now no need to have both.
Removes a whole bunch of Sem().Get() smell, and simplifies the resolver.
Bug: tint:724
Fixed: tint:761
Change-Id: I756a32680ac52441fd6eebf6fc53dd507ef5e538
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49961
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Register all aliases, and don't share type nodes
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I7ac20c8a75f232fa7fe1e8c1a5690f411888f6e4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49750
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Used as a stepping stone to emitting the ast::Types instead.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: Ib2d6c150fe8aa7c1e2c502676922b14b1518a4be
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48686
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Used as a stepping stone to emitting the ast::Types instead.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: Idadb7d8b5d6fce1d898127675442221de07a633d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48685
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Fixed: tint:94
Change-Id: I1d3e512c030ec16031b8c8fcfbde0cd1db5d1ea4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48380
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#variable-declaration
Variables in the storage storage class and variables with a storage
texture type must have an access attribute applied to the store type.
https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#module-scope-variables
A variable in the storage storage class is a storage buffer variable. Its
store type must be a host-shareable structure type with block attribute,
satisfying the storage class constraints.
Fixup tests, including those that were producing warnings about `var <in>`
The WGSL writer seems to want to put a newline after every decoration block, leading to some ugly output. I'll fix this as a separate change.
Fixes: tint:531
Fixes: tint:692
Change-Id: If09d987477247ab4a7c635f6ee6e616a06061515
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47763
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Fix some SPIR-V tests that were wrongly expecting parameters to be
loaded from memory as a result of them not being const.
Change-Id: Ieab6f1edd4a4ba6efd226fe190e7a49b309048c5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/47281
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This will be used to validate layout rules, as well as preventing
illegal types from being used in a uniform / storage buffer.
Also: Cleanup logic around VariableDeclStatement
This was spread across 3 places, entirely unnecessarily.
Bug: tint:643
Change-Id: I9d309c3a5dfb5676984f49ce51763a97bcac93bb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/45125
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>