Compensate for the fact that dominance does not correspond
exactly to scoping. A definition can dominate a use, but when mapped
in a naive way to constant definitiion and its use, the definition
name goes out of scope by the time you reach the use.
This is correct for storable types.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I03e6c5ba68393151485ed4cdbe6b2b3d7773d1ad
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/24141
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
Avoid sinking expensive operations into control flow such as loops.
The heuristic way to achieve that is to avoid moving combinatorial
values across *any* structured construct boundaries.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I91502b01166a0db64c0e652331591850df75f9d4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/24140
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
TODOs in the test file are or were in the function_arithmetic_test.cc
Change-Id: I679dbf0019e12e26488ccc310dfb03a535628e0b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/23462
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
This CL cleans up various formatting and lint errors.
Change-Id: Ieee14db90e36acc8b469d58abb84fcf3595321bb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/23224
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Add a guard variable for flow control within that if-selection.
Also, the premerge blocks are always surrounded by an if-selection,
to ensure we cause reconvergence at the end of the original if-selection
construct, just like in the original SPIR-V.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I614c6840e539bf9a338058beb5b6f70484e3320a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/23182
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
This supports the extended instructions used by the compute_boids
example.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I364c343217139e489377dd2a9330058114023caa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/23126
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
- Avoid redundant switch-break.
WGSL does an implicit break at the end of a switch case, because
it has fallthrough.
TODO: Emit fallthrough
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: Ida44b13181a01a2c1459c0447dac496ba5b97ffc
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22961
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
In BlockInfo, remove the backpointers from true-head, false-head, and
premerge-head to the if-selection header block.
Convert the forward references from if-selection to its internal heads
from pointers to IDs.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: Ic931df519795e14374bff4f60ad37a4b32f79c91
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/23140
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
Produce less noise in ASTs for a common case.
Also test that an empty continuing construct doesn't show up in the
AST. That's currently handled by the AST code. We want to keep this
behaviour even if the AST implementation changes. Right now
code change is needed when emitting the start of a continuing
construct.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I96a12087e305c64647561f65d87acda907ae9c42
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22844
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
This emits the equivalent of break-if, break-unless, continue-if,
continue-unless. But we do it via a regular if-then-else.
Adds a test matrix.
Adds all required tests except for those needing OpSwitch.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I960a40aa00f95f394a92a099c8b12104010ad49f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22603
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
A merge block must be dominated by its own header.
This CL checks the cases where that fails because the
merge block is also the:
- the default or case header for a switch (a different header)
- the true-head, false-head, or premerge-head for an if-selection
with a different header
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I6dd1fae162e9d33bd9a0b43d3ca9558cebed058b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22680
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
This fixes the pathological cases nobody wants, and arguably
should be added to the SPIR-V spec.
If we really really want to support these cases, we can revisit.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I0a75490d451676caa0933e3761098ba1fe3f8b60
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22664
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
The `>>>` symbol was folded into the `>>` symbol in WGSL. This CL
removes `>>>` from Tint.
Change-Id: I9d900de9a6026a8099796b94aad44483f0c6813f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22582
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
This is preparation for emitting nested control flow.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I90fc7edba8cb9937f722e6f5e94c7f222d34c403
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21801
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
The NOP command was added for complete SPIR-V bijectivity which is no
longer a goal of WGSL. The NOP command has been removed from the spec,
so remove from Tint.
Change-Id: Ic640d9d3b987a19668dc169ff549444921c5bbb8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/22160
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Do so systmatically. Before we had tested some as a side effect
of other objectives.
Fix the error message for when we have a bad exit from a loop construct
that bypasses not only the continue construct but the loop merge block
itself.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: Iaf8fc9bcd3162002aa906efa90a244ef5f439911
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21580
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
Remove TOOD about special code for finding badly nested selections.
This is already adequately covered by the dominance-violation checks,
and related tests:
ClassifyCFGEdges_DomViolation_BeforeIfToSelectionInterior
ClassifyCFGEdges_DomViolation_BeforeSwitchToSelectionInterior
ClassifyCFGEdges_DomViolation_BeforeLoopToLoopBodyInterior
ClassifyCFGEdges_DomViolation_BeforeContinueToContinueInterior
ClassifyCFGEdges_DomViolation_AfterContinueToContinueInterior
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I8c547474d1422a54078d748b39a7d22a500d5d1d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21482
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
Unordered float compares are not supported directly by WGSL.
Translate them as negated ordered compares.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I4fea7c924054cffc9a39a8be3b3d9f088d302114
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21540
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Finds the "then", the "else", and "premerge" nodes.
The premerge node, if it exists, is the first block where
the normal forward flow of the "then" and "else" clauses
converge, but before the merge block.
Finds error case where there a block has both an if-break
edge and a forward-to-premerge. There is no good way
to model that in a high level language.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I759fc539f3480e38d091041db6a9abd15f3df769
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21240
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
This also refactors break detection.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I3a3e01c8d76d7c6fc2a14b3dbff136acd487e802
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21220
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
These used to be classified as kToMerge
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I63fb286c371582676e5943a3082c0614b9c8d5d0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21081
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
Distinguish between selections constructs starting with with
OpBranchConditional and those starting with OpSwitch.
We'll use this in a followup CL to track break from a switch.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I8d000cb42325535a4937c84f83a83c98a9b8d4c5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/21080
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
Classify CFG edges:
- loop backedge
- a structured exit:
- loop break
- loop continue
- selection break
- fallthrough
- forward (any of the rest)
Also error out when there should have been a merge instruction.
(More than one unique fallthrough or forward edge).
Includes lots of tests.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: I70f27680bdf098213056522abf04ac58a6b478ab
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/20481
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>
This CL splits the TypeConstructor code out of the generic
ConstructorExpression to make the code separation clearer.
Bug: tint:5
Change-Id: I441955c3b09a30b2d02f542f4b7c8e80ff8d9d86
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/20640
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
This CL adds the beginning of break and continue support. The
conditional versions are not supported, just the non-conditional.
Bug: tint:5
Change-Id: I84418cffd3e29dc011c4313bf9aa3da4833c009f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/20500
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Label basic blocks with:
- their nearest enclosing structured control flow constructs.
- their nearest enclosing continue construct, if any
- their nearest enclosing loop construct, if any
A construct consists of a span of blocks in the computed block order.
It knows its parent construct, if any, and its nesting depth.
Bug: tint:3
Change-Id: Ia945706e8ea2435d6c40fb4e36dc2daeeb9780d0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/20421
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@google.com>