This will be used to validate layout rules, as well as preventing
illegal types from being used in a uniform / storage buffer.
Also: Cleanup logic around VariableDeclStatement
This was spread across 3 places, entirely unnecessarily.
Bug: tint:643
Change-Id: I9d309c3a5dfb5676984f49ce51763a97bcac93bb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/45125
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This is the size of the structure without the trailing alignment
padding. This is what the Dawn needs from the Inspector.
Fixed: tint:653
Change-Id: Iaa01ba949e114973e4a33e084fc10ef9e111016c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/45120
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Generate a global variable for the return value and replace return
statements with assignments to this variable.
Add a list of return statements to semantic::Function.
Bug: tint:509
Change-Id: I6bc08fcac7858b48f0eff62199d5011665284220
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44804
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This change validates that the operand types and result type of every
binary operation is valid.
* Added two unit tests which test all valid and invalid param combos. I
also removed the old tests, many of which failed once I added this
validation, and the rest are obviated by the new tests.
* Fixed VertexPulling transform, as well as many tests, that were using
invalid operand types for binary operations.
Fixed: tint:354
Change-Id: Ia3f48384256993da61b341f17ba5583741011819
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44341
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Added enforcement for vector constructor type rules according to the
table in https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl.html#type-constructor-expr.
This surfaced a number of existing tests that violated some of these
rules or had a type-declaration related bug, so this CL fixes those as
well (these tests either passed the incorrect number of arguments to a
vector constructor or relied on implicit conversions between numeric
types).
Fixed: tint:632
Fixed: tint:476
Change-Id: I8279be3eeae50b64db486ee7a91a43bd94fdff62
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44480
Commit-Queue: Arman Uguray <armansito@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Let's keep these for the SPIR-V reader case. The way things currently work is actually nicer than attempting to generate size / align decorations in the SPIR-V reader.
Change-Id: I83087c153e3b3056e737dcfbfd73ae6a0986bd7c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44684
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This was broken by a rebase of the Default Struct Layout change.
This went unnoticed because there was no test coverage for these. Added.
Also replace `[[offset(n)]]` decorations with padding fields.
Bug: tint:626
Change-Id: Iad6f1a239bc8d8fcb15d18a204d3f5a78a372350
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44683
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Remove the decoration groupings (Array, Function, Struct,
StructMember, Type, Variable), such that all *Decoration classes now
subclass ast::Decoration directly. This allows for decorations to be
used in multiple places; for example, builtin decorations are now
valid for both variables and struct members.
Checking that decoration lists only contain decorations that are valid
for the node that they are attached to is now done inside the
validator.
Change-Id: Ie8c0e53e5730a7dedea50a1dec8f26f9e7b00e8d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44320
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
The readers must not produce invalid ASTs.
If readers cannot produce a valid AST, then they should error instead.
If a reader does produce an invalid AST, this change catches this bad behavior early, significantly helping identify the root of the broken logic.
IsValid() made a bit more sense in the days where the AST was mutable, and was constructed by calling setters on the nodes to build up the tree.
In order to detect bad ASTs, IsValid() would have to perform an entire AST traversal and give a yes / no answer for the entire tree. Not only was this slow, an answer of 'no' didn't tell you *where* the AST was invalid, resulting in a lot of manual debugging.
Now that the AST is fully immutable, all child nodes need to be built before their parents. The AST node constructors now become a perfect place to perform pointer sanity checking.
The argument for attempting to catch and handle invalid ASTs is not a compelling one.
Invalid ASTs are invalid compiler behavior, not something that should ever happen with a correctly functioning compiler.
If this were to happen in production, the user would be utterly clueless to _why_ the program is invalid, or _how_ to fix it.
Attempting to handle invalid ASTs is just masking a much larger problem.
Let's just let the fuzzers do their job to catch any of these cases early.
Fixed: chromium:1185569
Change-Id: I6496426a3a9da9d42627d2c1ca23917bfd04cc5c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44048
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
All includes from .cc to .h are preserved, even when transitively included.
It's clear that there are far too many includes in header files, and we should be more aggressive with forward declarations. tint:532 will continue to track this work.
There are, however, plenty of includes that have accumulated over time which are no longer required directly or transitively, so this change starts with a clean slate of *required* includes.
Bug: tint:532
Change-Id: Ie1718dad565f8309fa180ef91bcf3920e76dba18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44042
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
