Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Skipping those that are block-decorated is not correct, as
block-decorated structures can also have non-buffer usages. This is
even clearer now that WGSL has removed the block attribute.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I6484766a5c541d39e2dc08beb3ae7b889759a3fb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72083
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Now that I've landed this change to Dawn to disable FXC optimizations:
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70700,, we can reland this
change. The Tint-into-Dawn roll was failing because FXC would miscompile
certain loops into infinite loops when not unrolled.
Also reland
test/bug/fxc/gradient_in_varying_loop/1112.wgsl.expected.hlsl
Bug: tint:1112
Bug: dawn:1203
Change-Id: I641d68864b833e0fbe3b117d397b89ae96482536
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71000
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This reverts commit 11d09f2fe7.
Reason for revert: Failing roll of Tint to Dawn: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70100
Original change's description:
> HLSL: force FXC to never unroll loops
>
> Emit the "[loop]" attribute on "for" and "while" so that FXC does not
> attempt to unroll them. This is to work around an FXC bug where it fails
> to unroll loops with gradient operations.
>
> FXC ostensibly unrolls such loops because gradient operations require
> uniform control flow, and loops that have varying iterations may
> possibly not be uniform. Tint will eventually validate that control flow
> is indeed uniform, so forcing FXC to avoid unrolling in these cases
> should be fine.
>
> Bug: tint:1112
> Change-Id: I10077f8b62fbbb230a0003f3864c75a8fe0e1d18
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69880
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: I8e8f3c0abfa6e6bc5d0e67af9428a46ef867d5c1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70540
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Emit the "[loop]" attribute on "for" and "while" so that FXC does not
attempt to unroll them. This is to work around an FXC bug where it fails
to unroll loops with gradient operations.
FXC ostensibly unrolls such loops because gradient operations require
uniform control flow, and loops that have varying iterations may
possibly not be uniform. Tint will eventually validate that control flow
is indeed uniform, so forcing FXC to avoid unrolling in these cases
should be fine.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: I10077f8b62fbbb230a0003f3864c75a8fe0e1d18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69880
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This removes a lot of awkward logic from the MSL writer, and means
that we now handle all module-scope variables with the same transform.
Change-Id: I782e36a4b88dafbc3f8364f7caa7f95c6ae3f5f1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/67643
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
These operators are not defined in the metal namespace when the vector
operands are packed.
Fixed: tint:1121
Change-Id: I2e8f4302e08117ca41bac6c05fb24a70d1215740
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62480
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
MSL vectors with other widths already match WGSL's rules for alignment
and size.
Change-Id: I237052372463ea8323eab47c3b4ca90c6d8afcc3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62600
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Arrays can be extremely large, and having the load and store functions unroll the elements can make the complier explode.
Fixed: chromium:1229233
Change-Id: Ieb5654254e16f5ce724a205d21d954ef9a0cd053
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58382
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
CloneContext::Replace(T* what, T* with) is bug-prone, as complex transforms may want to clone `what` multiple times, or not at all. In both cases, this will likely result in an ICE as either the replacement will be reachable multiple times, or not at all.
The CTS test: webgpu:shader,execution,robust_access:linear_memory:storageClass="storage";storageMode="read_write";access="read";atomic=true;baseType="i32"
Was triggering this brokenness with DecomposeMemoryAccess's use of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*).
Switch the usage of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*) to the new function form.
As std::function is copyable, it cannot hold a captured std::unique_ptr.
This prevented the Replace() lambdas from capturing the necessary `BufferAccess` data, as this held a `std::unique_ptr<Offset>`.
To fix this, use a `BlockAllocator` for Offsets, and use raw pointers instead.
Because the function passed to Replace() is called just before the node is cloned, insertion of new functions will occur just before the currently evaluated module-scope entity.
This allows us to remove the "insert_after" arguments to LoadFunc(), StoreFunc(), and AtomicFunc().
We can also kill the icky InsertGlobal() and TypeDeclOf() helpers.
Bug: tint:993
Change-Id: I60972bc13a2fa819a163ee2671f61e82d0e68d2a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58222
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Use the new semantic constant value information to significantly reduce the complex indexing logic emitted for UBO accesses.
This will dramatically reduce the number of `for` loops that are decayed to `while` loops.
Change-Id: I1b0adb5edde2b4ed39c6beafc2e28106b86e0edd
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57701
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
James Price
Ben Clayton
Antonio Maiorano
Stephen White