Deprecate the old syntax. Migrate everything to the new syntax.
Bug: tint:1382
Change-Id: Ide12b2e927b17dc93b9714c7049090864cc568d3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77260
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
In https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62444 the Resolver validated that there are no parameters of the same function with the same name, but this also introduced validation that errors if parameters shadow a module-scope variable.
The WGSL spec allows for shadowing, but Tint so far has not implemented this support.
There are transforms that generate functions that presume parameter <-> module-scope variable shadowing is okay. DecomposeMemoryAccess is one of these.
This fixes those transforms which could generate programs that fail validation.
Bug: chromium:1242330
Fixed: tint:1136
Change-Id: Id6ec59bbdb398b3b2a23312115a7c1dadf433e98
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62900
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Ben Clayton
James Price