Deprecate the old syntax. Migrate everything to the new syntax.
Bug: tint:1382
Change-Id: Ide12b2e927b17dc93b9714c7049090864cc568d3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77260
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
The expected output is far from perfect, and the generated HLSL and MSL
isn't even validated yet, so may be incorrect.
However, by committing the generated output, we get clear examples of
the currently generated output of each backend. As we land fixes and
improvements to each backend, the presubmits will require us to update
the expected test output, and so code reviews will include diffs of
each backend's generated output.
Change-Id: I5c2a9e5b796d0ab75b3ec4c7f8ad00a0a2ab166f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51224
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Ben Clayton
James Price
Sarah