Update one test to avoid this error.
Fixed: tint:1179
Change-Id: Id41b0eb0f404648de4e86a835fe43f1729cb4696
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/64464
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
MSL vectors with other widths already match WGSL's rules for alignment
and size.
Change-Id: I237052372463ea8323eab47c3b4ca90c6d8afcc3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62600
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Remap all resources into a flat namespace, to allow tests to pass when
multiple resources use the same binding number.
Fixed: tint:959
Change-Id: I58ed07c789e1ea90fc370ceba73b9d8292902549
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/61261
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is a major reworking of this transform. The old transform code
was getting unwieldy, with part of the complication coming from the
handling of multiple return statements. By generating a wrapper
function instead, we can avoid a lot of this complexity.
The original entry point function is stripped of all shader IO
attributes (as well as `stage` and `workgroup_size`), but the body is
left unmodified. A new entry point wrapper function is introduced
which calls the original function, packing/unpacking the shader inputs
as necessary, and propagates the result to the corresponding shader
outputs.
The new code has been refactored to use a state object with the
different parts of the transform split into separate functions, which
makes it much more manageable.
Fixed: tint:1076
Bug: tint:920
Change-Id: I3490a0ea7a3509a4e198ce730e476516649d8d96
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60521
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
David Neto
James Price
Ben Clayton