Despite `tint::ast::type::Type` being in the AST namespace, these classes are clearly not AST nodes:
* They don't derive from ast::Node
* They're deduplicated by the type manager
* None of the types have an Source - they have no lexical declaration point
* The fact we have `ast::Struct` and `ast::type::Struct` clearly demonstrates what is an AST node, and what is a type.
* We have code scattered in the codebase (TypeDeterminer, writers, etc) that create new types after parsing - so clearly not part of the original syntax tree.
Types in tint are closer to being semantic info, but due to the parse-time generation of types, and tight dependency of ast::Nodes to types, I'd be reluctant to class these as semantic info. Instead, put these into a separate root level `tint::type` namespace and `src/tint` directory.
The fact that types exist in the ast::Module has already caused bugs (https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/37261). This is a first step in separating out types from the ast::Module.
Bug: tint:390
Change-Id: I8349bbbd1b19597b8e6d51d5cda0890de46ecaec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/38002
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This CL upldates the vertex_idx, instance_idx and global_invocation_idx
builtins to use the full _index names. The original values still exist
until we can update downstream users.
Change-Id: Icd02601eeb15704d5463158541c07816d98e5383
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/37940
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This CL changes the set decoration to a group decoration. We still parse
`set` until downstream users can be updated.
Bug: tint:338
Change-Id: I610d1ed769b3a26c117ad6d875f8a99a3d5b7754
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/37920
Auto-Submit: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
instead of transform-in-place.
This is a public API breaking change, so I've added the `DAWN_USE_NEW_TINT_TRANSFORM_API` define which is used by Dawn to know which API to use.
As we're going to have to go through the effort of an API breaking change, use this as an opportunity to rename Transformer to Transform, and remove 'Transform' from each of the transforms themselves (they're already in the transform namespace).
Bug: tint:390
Bug: tint:389
Change-Id: I1017507524b76bb4ffd26b95e550ef53ddc891c9
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34800
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Ben Clayton
dan sinclair