Just as we do with for loops that need decomposing to loops, we must
also decompose 'else if's to 'else { if }' so that we can insert decls
above the condition.
Bug: tint:1300
Change-Id: Ia16f1cf351964817587d353e58a02d9ae6f8386c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77500
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Most of this change is fixing up the numerious tests that violated this rule.
Fixed: tint:1365
Issue: tint:1374
Change-Id: I38da27c7367277fe60857208170fec017e80bd25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76400
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
PromoteInitializersToConstVar was erroring on for loops that contained array or structure constructor expressions.
Added lots more tests.
Fixed: tint:1364
Change-Id: I033eaad94756ea496fc8bc5f03f39c6dba4e3a88
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75580
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Migrate some of the validation logic over to use the results of behavior
analysis.
The most significant changes are:
* Unreachable-statements now consider merge-points of control flow. For
example, if all branches of a if-statement or switch-statement either
return or discard, the next statement will be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements are no longer an error, but a warning. See
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/2378.
* Statements that follow a loops that does not break, or have a
conditional will now be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements produced by the SPIR-V reader are now removed
using the new RemoveUnreachableStatements transform.
Some other new changes include additional validation for the continuing
block for for-loops, to match the rules of a loop continuing block.
The new cases this validation is testing for are not expressible in
WGSL, but some transforms may produce complex continuing statements that
might violate these rules. All the writers are able to decay these
complex for-loop continuing statements to regular loops.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: I0d8a48c73d5d5c30a1cddf92cc3383a692a58e61
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71500
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This change implements the behavior analysis for expressions and
statements as described in:
https://www.w3.org/TR/WGSL/#behaviors
This CL makes no changes to the validation rules. This will be done as a
followup change.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: If0a251a7982ea15ff5d93b54a5cc5ed03ba60608
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68408
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
