FXC fails to compile code that assigns to dynamically-indexed fixed-size
arrays in structs on internal shader variables with:
error X3500: array reference cannot be used as an l-value; not natively
addressable
This CL detects this case, and transforms such assignments into copying
out the array to a local variable, assigning to that local, and then
copying the array back.
Also manually regenerate SKIPs for HLSL/FXC after this change, which
fixes 30 tests. Also exposes some "compilation aborted unexpectedly" now
that "array reference cannot be used as an l-value" has been fixed. For
tests that fail for both DXC and FXC, updating SKIPs to the DXC one to
help distinguish actual FXC bugs from valid errors.
Bug: tint:998
Bug: tint:1206
Change-Id: I09204d8d81ab27d1c257538ad702414ccc386543
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71620
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Migrate some of the validation logic over to use the results of behavior
analysis.
The most significant changes are:
* Unreachable-statements now consider merge-points of control flow. For
example, if all branches of a if-statement or switch-statement either
return or discard, the next statement will be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements are no longer an error, but a warning. See
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/2378.
* Statements that follow a loops that does not break, or have a
conditional will now be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements produced by the SPIR-V reader are now removed
using the new RemoveUnreachableStatements transform.
Some other new changes include additional validation for the continuing
block for for-loops, to match the rules of a loop continuing block.
The new cases this validation is testing for are not expressible in
WGSL, but some transforms may produce complex continuing statements that
might violate these rules. All the writers are able to decay these
complex for-loop continuing statements to regular loops.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: I0d8a48c73d5d5c30a1cddf92cc3383a692a58e61
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71500
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This change implements the behavior analysis for expressions and
statements as described in:
https://www.w3.org/TR/WGSL/#behaviors
This CL makes no changes to the validation rules. This will be done as a
followup change.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: If0a251a7982ea15ff5d93b54a5cc5ed03ba60608
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68408
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Performs a module-scope (global) declaration dependency analysis, so
that out-of-order global declarations can be re-ordered into dependency
order for consumption by the resolver.
The WGSL working group are currently debating whether out-of-order
declarations should be included in WebGPU V1, so this implementation
currently errors if module-scope declarations are declared out-of-order,
and the resolver does not currently use this sorted global list.
The analysis does however provide significantly better error diagnostics
when cyclic dependencies are formed, and when globals are declared
out-of-order.
The DependencyGraph also correctly now detects symbol collisions between
functions and types (tint:1308).
With this change, validation is duplicated between the DependencyGraph
and the Resolver. The now-unreachable validation will be removed from
the Resolver with a followup change.
Fixed: tint:1308
Bug: tint:1266
Change-Id: I809c23a069a86cf429f5ec8ef3ad9a98246766ab
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69381
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Add a new 'Target' to the ast::CallExpression, which can be either an
Identifier or Type. The Identifier may resolve to a Type, if the Type is
a structure or alias.
The Resolver now resolves the CallExpression target to one of the
following sem::CallTargets:
* sem::Function
* sem::Intrinsic
* sem::TypeConstructor
* sem::TypeCast
This change will allow us to remove the type tracking logic from the WGSL
parser, which is required for out-of-order module scope declarations.
Bug: tint:888
Bug: tint:1266
Change-Id: I696f117115a50981fd5c102a0d7764641bb755dd
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68525
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Now that all LiteralExpressions derive from Expression, and Expr()
already handles literals, there's no reason to have this duplicated
functionality.
Bug: tint:888
Change-Id: I677b04a3cc325311ef25f6b9983fee7548e830f4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69105
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Literals are now expressions, so in keeping with all the other
expression types, suffix the class name with Expression.
I'm not overly keen on requiring everything to have an Expression
suffix, but consistency is better than personal preference.
Note: this should have been part of 30848b6, but I managed to drop
this change instead of squashing it. Opps.
Bug: tint:888
Change-Id: Idfaf96abe165a6bf5028e60a160e7408aa2bf9db
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68943
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This cleans up the remnants of ArrayAccessorExpression which was renamed
in a838bb718.
Change-Id: Ie2c67a49e63774d8b153ec17c3185652708a91e5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68942
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
To fix this, we trick the compiler by wrapping the function body with an
if (true) { <function body> } followed by returning an unused value of
the return type.
Bug: tint:1081
Change-Id: I763bf768f40d07a1045f0a70017bb40d488c8428
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68822
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
The object is not always an array. The index can be applied to vectors
too.
Change-Id: Ifb63d1862090d28cb48d692870e9dd01ddbce5df
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68841
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Literals are now expressions, so in keeping with all the other
expression types, suffix the class name with Expression.
I'm not overly keen on requiring everything to have an Expression
suffix, but consistency is better than personal preference.
Bug: tint:888
Change-Id: Ida1f1b98c71d5d0fe6399bca938010cd5d3a00c3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68840
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Just make Literal an expression. The ScalarConstructorExpression
provides no real value, aside from having a ConstructorExpression base
class that's common between ScalarConstructorExpression and
TypeConstructorExpression. TypeConstructorExpression will be folded into
CallExpression, so this hierarchy will serve no purpose.
First step in resolving the parser ambiguity of type-constructors vs
type-casts vs function calls.
Bug: tint:888
Change-Id: I2585d5ddbf6c0619a8f24c503e61ebf27c182ebe
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68524
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This is slightly different from the other helpers, since this AST node
does not have a source.
Change-Id: I56e72eb0f26f80d52be9e4f51dd42c3d5149cb00
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/67644
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The `Ignore()` intrinsic is about to be deprecated, so don't use it for testing.
Bug: tint:1213
Change-Id: Ib5d5966da6d566a9f02940970ebd79d520b5e0e8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/67065
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
And remove a whole load of const_cast hackery.
Semantic nodes may contain internally mutable fields (although only ever modified during resolving), so these are always passed by `const` pointer.
While all AST nodes are internally immutable, we have decided that pointers to AST nodes should also be marked `const`, for consistency.
There's still a collection of const_cast calls in the Resolver. These will be fixed up in a later change.
Bug: tint:745
Change-Id: I046309b8e586772605fc0fe6b2d27f28806d40ef
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/66606
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Methods and functions are `CamelCase()`
Public fields are `snake_case` with no trailing `_`
Private fields are `snake_case` with a trailing `_`
Remove pointless getters on fully immutable fields.
They provide no value, and just add `()` noise on use.
Remove unused methods.
Bug: tint:1231
Change-Id: If32efd039df48938efd5bc2186d51fe4853e9840
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/66600
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This is no longer used.
Fixed: tint:1225
Change-Id: I0cfe9955687a2b7ded3e645c573f3bffbc2f1f84
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/66380
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
These return weird names that love the use of '__' and have little relation to WGSL.
Improve the duplicate case error message.
Clean up control_block_validation_test.cc by making used of the ProgramBuilder helpers.
Bug: tint:1225
Change-Id: I8c4cf3943145cf8372c00d33ae0166c0c0bcbb8b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/66442
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Change ast::Array to use an ast::Expression for its `size` field. The
WGSL frontend now parses the array size as an `primary_expression`,
and the Resolver is responsible for validating the expression is a
signed or unsigned integer, and either a literal or a non-overridable
module-scope constant.
The Resolver evaluates the constant value of the size expression, and
so the resolved sem::Array type still has a constant size as before.
Fixed: tint:1068
Fixed: tint:1117
Change-Id: Icfa141482ea1e47ea8c21a25e9eb48221f176e9a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/63061
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways:
When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s
§ 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then:
- The break statement must appear as either:
- The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has:
- no else clause or an empty else clause
- no elseif clauses
- The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an
empty if clause and no elseif clauses.
- That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause.
By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and
back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL
to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being
the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the
other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That
OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an
unconditional backedge.
Avoids errors like this:
continue construct with the continue target X is not
post dominated by the back-edge block Y
Fixed: 1034
Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Implemented for all readers and writers.
Cleaned up some verbose code in sem::Function and the Inspector in the
process.
Fixed: tint:1032
Change-Id: Ia6f2f59e6d2e511c89160b97be990e8b7c9828d9
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59664
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Each of these may contain information specific to their kind.
Change-Id: Ic8ac808088132b7bc2e43da6ce46a06571e0fed5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59200
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Check they do not contain returns, discards
Check they do not directly contain continues, however a nested loop can have its own continue.
Bug: chromium:1229976
Change-Id: Ia3c4ac118ffdaa6cca6025366c19f9897718c930
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58384
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is a reland of fd5829e5ea
Original change's description:
> Validate storage class constraints
>
> As defined by https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#storage-class-layout-constraints
>
> Bug: tint:643
> Change-Id: I9c78ba69a792a80c263a17b0a6e9b4810fdb7f30
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56780
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Bug: tint:643
Change-Id: I62036d615a062597339a9d130b7ccf49b5be26c7
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58120
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This reverts commit fd5829e5ea.
Reason for revert: Temporarily reverting as this is preventing a tint->dawn roll, which is needed to fix the dawn->chrome roll.
Original change's description:
> Validate storage class constraints
>
> As defined by https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#storage-class-layout-constraints
>
> Bug: tint:643
> Change-Id: I9c78ba69a792a80c263a17b0a6e9b4810fdb7f30
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56780
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
TBR=bclayton@google.com,amaiorano@google.com,noreply+kokoro@google.com,tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I8dbd0e46b3e3291ef08797a196d0d9abd2a78845
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: tint:643
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57704
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is only valid on structure members and entry point return
types. Additionally, this can only be applied to a position builtin.
Bug: tint:772
Change-Id: Iffd774ca768ab66373678ecf0eb57c766767e92b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57641
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
They are only valid on entry point parameters and return types, and
struct members. They must only be used on floating point scalar and
vector types. If the interpolation type is flat, the sampling type
must not be specified.
Bug: tint:746
Change-Id: Iab17816bc9947a74593a5937bdf513ac9ec664f1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56241
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Allows transforms to assert their dependencies have been run before they
are.
Also allows the backends to validate that their sanitizers have been run
before they're used.
Change-Id: I1e97afe06f9e7371283bade54bbb2e2c41f87a00
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55442
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
The CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform now takes an optional config
option for a fixed sample mask. If there was no sample mask in the
authored shader, add one and return the fixed mask, otherwise AND the
fixed mask with the authored value.
Add a config option to the MSL sanitizer to receive a fixed sample
mask and pass it through to CanonicalizeEntryPointIO.
Bug: tint:387
Change-Id: I1678d915b19a718005d5832c5d624809ee432587
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55520
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is required for implementing module-level conversions in the spir-v
backend (upcoming CL).
Bug: tint:865
Change-Id: I7fd38c6b1628c791851917165991bc247fc113c2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54740
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
And replace the MSL writer's logic to do this with the transform.
We need to do the same thing in HLSL, and in the future GLSL too.
Partially reverts fbfde720
Change-Id: Ie280e011bc3ded8e15ccacc0aeb12da3c2407389
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54242
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Also split out validation tests from call_test.cc into call_validation_test.cc.
Bug: tint:886
Change-Id: I1e1dee9b7c348363e89080cdecd3119cc004658f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54063
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
- Add resolver/call_test.cc for new unit tests, and move a couple that
were in resolver/validation_test.cc to it
- Fix CalculateArrayLength transform so that it passes the address of
the u32 it creates to the internal function
- Fix tests broken as a result of this change
Bug: tint:664
Change-Id: If713f9828790cd51224d2392d42c01c0057cb652
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53920
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
TypeDecls (alias, structure) are not a types - they declare types.
ast::TypeName is what's used for a ast::Type.
Previously we were trying to automatically convert these to TypeNames in the builder, but having these inherit from ast::Type was extremely error prone.
reader/spirv was actually constructing ast::Structs and using them as types, which is invalid.
Change-Id: I05773ad6d488626606019015b84217a5a55a8e8a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53802
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Combines the calls to ty.alias() and AST().AddConstructedType()
Change-Id: I84eaf6275d37141cf8973db7e04d25d9cb9c6351
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53801
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Required a lot of test fixes.
ProgramBuilder: :ConstructValueFilledWith() was a major source of unreached AST types, and this has been removed with more powerful type-building helpers in resolver_test_helper.h.
Change-Id: I1f2007cdaef7f319ab4ef8b4fb8c37687a0fb5d8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53800
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
ProgramBuilder is about as internal as you can get - this really should not be public.
MSVC seems to try an instantiate some of the template methods in ProgramBuilder when it is included externally (for PCH or DLL exports perhaps?), and failing with bizzare error messages that contain no point-of-instantiation.
As this header was never intended to be public in the first place, detect and error if the tint.h include guard is found while processing program_builder.h, and fix up the couple of bad transitive includes.
Fixes tint -> dawn autoroller
Change-Id: Ic9a81a44ab1b4a29a7297b94bbf85bcfdb1310b5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53384
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This also completes the work to resolve the access controls for each
storage type.
Fixed: tint:846
Change-Id: Iab24057ec14620a2978ec63c4a91ba12d1bc6e9b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53381
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Handle access control on var declarations instead of via [[access]]
decorations. This change does the minimal work to migrate the WGSL
parser over to the new syntax. Additional changes will be needed
to correctly generate defaulted access qualifiers, as well as
validating access usage.
The [[access]] decorations are still supported by the WGSL parser,
with new deprecated warnings, but not for aliases. Example:
var x : [[access(x)]] alias_to_struct;
Making this work is far more effort than I want to dedicate to backwards
compatibility, and I do not beleive any real-world usage will be doing
this.
Still TODO:
* Adding access control as the optional, third parameter to ptr<>.
* Calculating default accesses for the various storage types.
* Validating usage of variables against the different accesses.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: If8ca82e5d16ec319ecd01f9a2cafffd930963bde
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53088
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
and allow them in any order.
We're about to add Yet Another optional parameter - access control.
For style, we probably want this field before the decorations, however
that means adding more default values for all the cases where we don't
need to specify the access control.
Instead use some template magic to allow extra parameters to be
specified in any order, and entirely optional, with sensible defaults.
This keeps things readable and without huge code refactorings.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: I4f61eb765de63ad98ae786d187d2bd1b42942756
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53087
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Antonio Maiorano
Ben Clayton
James Price
David Neto