Once a `Decoration` has been parsed, it'll be placed into a `DecorationList` and validated later in the parse. In order to create error diagnostics that refer back to the decoration, we need to know its source.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: I38de708adbd041601b61d7e0a4d0402e9a2fe526
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31722
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
This is the first step in unifying the way decorations are parsed - i.e. instead of parsing decorations in different ways based on the predicted grammar that follows, we can parse decorations blocks in a unified way, then later verify what we have is as expected.
`StructDecoration` has been transformed from an `enum class` to a proper class so it can derive from `Decoration`.
Bug: tint:282
Bug: tint:291
Change-Id: Iaf12d266068d03edf695acdf2cd21e6cc3ea8eb3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/31663
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This CL updates the WGSL parser to allow array decorations to accept
multiple blocks. The stride decoration on arrays was turned into a
proper decoration object instead of just storing the stride directly.
Bug: tint:240
Change-Id: I6cdc7400d8847e3e043b846ea5c9f86cb795cf86
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/29780
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>