Both OpImageRead and OpImageFetch map to WGSL textureLoad.
Bug: tint:109
Change-Id: I3c99840c2e62c52dcaaf7177773a3c972de90cc1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/34425
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Also ensure that the number of texture coordinates is exactly
the right number required for the given texture dimension.
I think SPIR-V is looser in this respect.
Assumes coordinates are floating point.
Bug: tint:349
Change-Id: I4512c333fada3647c66f13ef31897b2d73b46cf0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33982
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
- Emit (non-depth) sampler variables
- Emit sampled texture variables
- Test emission of textureSample, textureBias, textureLevel
TODO: convert unsigned offset parameter to signed. crbug.com/tint/348
TODO: support arrayed access, where we have to split out the array index
into a separate operand. crbug.com/tint/349
TODO: for explicit-lod sampling, we may have to convert coordinates to
floating point. crbug.com/tint/346
Bug: tint:109
Change-Id: I12558f99473ca234ce0d09a87fc0c2f4730497bc
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33342
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
The reason being that some tests called parse() twice, which will silently destruct the first parser.
Once the `Module` owns the AST nodes, the second call will end up deleting all the AST nodes. Tests would then perform use-after-free for the AST nodes belonging to the first parser / module.
There's no reason why the unique_ptr can't be returned, which is cleaner overall.
Bug: tint:335
Change-Id: I7ff2e9777a7ebeb76702f806294fe4c2c49bd7c9
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33241
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2fed4cf2a052686e2121066588686f05907a169f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33200
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
It's valid to look for but not find an underlying memory object
declaration.
Bug: tint:109
Change-Id: I7296d79550a50050d2438996dc3e0c8d09a6babd
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/33140
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: dan sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
