encounter
/
dawn-cmake
mirror of https://github.com/encounter/dawn-cmake.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dawn-cmake/test/vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/spv-stable-maze-flatten-cop.../1.wgsl.expected.spvasm

849 lines
35 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; SPIR-V
; Version: 1.3
; Generator: Google Tint Compiler; 0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
; Bound: 545
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
; Schema: 0
OpCapability Shader
OpMemoryModel Logical GLSL450
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
OpEntryPoint Fragment %main "main" %gl_FragCoord_param_1 %x_GLF_color_1_1
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpExecutionMode %main OriginUpperLeft
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
OpName %gl_FragCoord_param_1 "gl_FragCoord_param_1"
OpName %x_GLF_color_1_1 "x_GLF_color_1_1"
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpName %gl_FragCoord "gl_FragCoord"
OpName %buf0 "buf0"
OpMemberName %buf0 0 "resolution"
OpName %x_7 "x_7"
OpName %map "map"
OpName %x_GLF_color "x_GLF_color"
OpName %main_1 "main_1"
OpName %pos "pos"
OpName %ipos "ipos"
OpName %i "i"
OpName %p "p"
OpName %canwalk "canwalk"
OpName %v "v"
OpName %directions "directions"
OpName %j "j"
OpName %d "d"
OpName %x_104 "x_104"
OpName %x_124 "x_124"
OpName %x_144 "x_144"
OpName %x_164 "x_164"
OpName %x_105_phi "x_105_phi"
OpName %x_125_phi "x_125_phi"
OpName %x_145_phi "x_145_phi"
OpName %x_165_phi "x_165_phi"
OpName %x_229 "x_229"
OpName %x_242 "x_242"
OpName %x_281 "x_281"
OpName %x_288 "x_288"
OpName %x_289 "x_289"
OpName %x_295 "x_295"
OpName %x_296 "x_296"
OpName %x_303 "x_303"
OpName %x_304 "x_304"
OpName %x_315 "x_315"
OpName %x_316 "x_316"
OpName %x_359 "x_359"
OpName %x_372 "x_372"
OpName %x_411 "x_411"
OpName %x_424 "x_424"
OpName %x_230_phi "x_230_phi"
OpName %x_243_phi "x_243_phi"
OpName %x_282_phi "x_282_phi"
OpName %x_290_phi "x_290_phi"
OpName %x_297_phi "x_297_phi"
OpName %x_305_phi "x_305_phi"
OpName %x_317_phi "x_317_phi"
OpName %x_360_phi "x_360_phi"
OpName %x_373_phi "x_373_phi"
OpName %x_412_phi "x_412_phi"
OpName %x_425_phi "x_425_phi"
OpName %main_out "main_out"
OpMemberName %main_out 0 "x_GLF_color_1"
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
OpName %main_inner "main_inner"
OpName %gl_FragCoord_param "gl_FragCoord_param"
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpName %main "main"
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
OpDecorate %gl_FragCoord_param_1 BuiltIn FragCoord
OpDecorate %x_GLF_color_1_1 Location 0
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpDecorate %buf0 Block
OpMemberDecorate %buf0 0 Offset 0
OpDecorate %x_7 NonWritable
OpDecorate %x_7 DescriptorSet 0
OpDecorate %x_7 Binding 0
OpDecorate %_arr_int_uint_256 ArrayStride 4
OpMemberDecorate %main_out 0 Offset 0
%float = OpTypeFloat 32
%v4float = OpTypeVector %float 4
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%_ptr_Input_v4float = OpTypePointer Input %v4float
%gl_FragCoord_param_1 = OpVariable %_ptr_Input_v4float Input
%_ptr_Output_v4float = OpTypePointer Output %v4float
%7 = OpConstantNull %v4float
%x_GLF_color_1_1 = OpVariable %_ptr_Output_v4float Output %7
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%_ptr_Private_v4float = OpTypePointer Private %v4float
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%gl_FragCoord = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %7
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%v2float = OpTypeVector %float 2
%buf0 = OpTypeStruct %v2float
%_ptr_Uniform_buf0 = OpTypePointer Uniform %buf0
%x_7 = OpVariable %_ptr_Uniform_buf0 Uniform
%int = OpTypeInt 32 1
%uint = OpTypeInt 32 0
%uint_256 = OpConstant %uint 256
%_arr_int_uint_256 = OpTypeArray %int %uint_256
%_ptr_Private__arr_int_uint_256 = OpTypePointer Private %_arr_int_uint_256
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%20 = OpConstantNull %_arr_int_uint_256
%map = OpVariable %_ptr_Private__arr_int_uint_256 Private %20
%x_GLF_color = OpVariable %_ptr_Private_v4float Private %7
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%void = OpTypeVoid
%22 = OpTypeFunction %void
%_ptr_Function_v2float = OpTypePointer Function %v2float
%28 = OpConstantNull %v2float
%v2int = OpTypeVector %int 2
%_ptr_Function_v2int = OpTypePointer Function %v2int
%32 = OpConstantNull %v2int
%_ptr_Function_int = OpTypePointer Function %int
%35 = OpConstantNull %int
%bool = OpTypeBool
%_ptr_Function_bool = OpTypePointer Function %bool
%40 = OpConstantNull %bool
%uint_0 = OpConstant %uint 0
%_ptr_Uniform_v2float = OpTypePointer Uniform %v2float
%_ptr_Function_float = OpTypePointer Function %float
%uint_1 = OpConstant %uint 1
%float_16 = OpConstant %float 16
%int_0 = OpConstant %int 0
%int_256 = OpConstant %int 256
%_ptr_Private_int = OpTypePointer Private %int
%int_1 = OpConstant %int 1
%83 = OpConstantComposite %v2int %int_0 %int_0
%true = OpConstantTrue %bool
%int_2 = OpConstant %int 2
%int_16 = OpConstant %int 16
%int_14 = OpConstant %int 14
%_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_256 = OpTypePointer Function %_arr_int_uint_256
%false = OpConstantFalse %bool
%int_8 = OpConstant %int 8
%358 = OpConstantComposite %_arr_int_uint_256 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0 %int_0
%float_1 = OpConstant %float 1
%528 = OpConstantComposite %v4float %float_1 %float_1 %float_1 %float_1
%float_0 = OpConstant %float 0
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%531 = OpConstantComposite %v4float %float_0 %float_0 %float_0 %float_1
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_out = OpTypeStruct %v4float
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%532 = OpTypeFunction %main_out %v4float
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%main_1 = OpFunction %void None %22
%25 = OpLabel
%pos = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_v2float Function %28
%ipos = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_v2int Function %32
%i = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%p = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_v2int Function %32
%canwalk = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%v = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%directions = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%j = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%d = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_104 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_124 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_144 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_164 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_105_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_125_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_145_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_165_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_229 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_242 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_281 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_288 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_289 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_295 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_296 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%x_303 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_256 Function %20
%x_304 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_256 Function %20
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%x_315 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_316 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_359 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_372 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_411 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_424 = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_230_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_243_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_282_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_290_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_297_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%x_305_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function__arr_int_uint_256 Function %20
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%x_317_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_int Function %35
%x_360_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_373_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_412_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%x_425_phi = OpVariable %_ptr_Function_bool Function %40
%45 = OpLoad %v4float %gl_FragCoord
%48 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Uniform_v2float %x_7 %uint_0
%49 = OpLoad %v2float %48
%50 = OpCompositeExtract %float %45 0
%51 = OpCompositeExtract %float %45 1
%52 = OpCompositeConstruct %v2float %50 %51
%53 = OpFDiv %v2float %52 %49
OpStore %pos %53
%55 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_float %pos %uint_0
%56 = OpLoad %float %55
%58 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_float %pos %uint_1
%59 = OpLoad %float %58
%62 = OpFMul %float %56 %float_16
%60 = OpConvertFToS %int %62
%64 = OpFMul %float %59 %float_16
%63 = OpConvertFToS %int %64
%65 = OpCompositeConstruct %v2int %60 %63
OpStore %ipos %65
OpStore %i %int_0
OpBranch %67
%67 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %68 %69 None
OpBranch %70
%70 = OpLabel
%71 = OpLoad %int %i
%73 = OpSLessThan %bool %71 %int_256
OpSelectionMerge %74 None
OpBranchConditional %73 %75 %76
%75 = OpLabel
OpBranch %74
%76 = OpLabel
OpBranch %68
%74 = OpLabel
%77 = OpLoad %int %i
%79 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %77
OpStore %79 %int_0
OpBranch %69
%69 = OpLabel
%80 = OpLoad %int %i
%82 = OpIAdd %int %80 %int_1
OpStore %i %82
OpBranch %67
%68 = OpLabel
OpStore %p %83
OpStore %canwalk %true
OpStore %v %int_0
OpBranch %85
%85 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %86 %87 None
OpBranch %88
%88 = OpLabel
%97 = OpLoad %int %v
%98 = OpIAdd %int %97 %int_1
OpStore %v %98
OpStore %directions %int_0
%99 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%100 = OpLoad %int %99
%101 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %100 %int_0
OpStore %x_105_phi %101
OpSelectionMerge %102 None
OpBranchConditional %101 %103 %102
%103 = OpLabel
%104 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%105 = OpLoad %int %104
%106 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%107 = OpLoad %int %106
%109 = OpISub %int %105 %int_2
%111 = OpIMul %int %107 %int_16
%112 = OpIAdd %int %109 %111
%113 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %112
%114 = OpLoad %int %113
%115 = OpIEqual %bool %114 %int_0
OpStore %x_104 %115
%116 = OpLoad %bool %x_104
OpStore %x_105_phi %116
OpBranch %102
%102 = OpLabel
%117 = OpLoad %bool %x_105_phi
OpSelectionMerge %118 None
OpBranchConditional %117 %119 %118
%119 = OpLabel
%120 = OpLoad %int %directions
%121 = OpIAdd %int %120 %int_1
OpStore %directions %121
OpBranch %118
%118 = OpLabel
%122 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%123 = OpLoad %int %122
%124 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %123 %int_0
OpStore %x_125_phi %124
OpSelectionMerge %125 None
OpBranchConditional %124 %126 %125
%126 = OpLabel
%127 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%128 = OpLoad %int %127
%129 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%130 = OpLoad %int %129
%131 = OpISub %int %130 %int_2
%132 = OpIMul %int %131 %int_16
%133 = OpIAdd %int %128 %132
%134 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %133
%135 = OpLoad %int %134
%136 = OpIEqual %bool %135 %int_0
OpStore %x_124 %136
%137 = OpLoad %bool %x_124
OpStore %x_125_phi %137
OpBranch %125
%125 = OpLabel
%138 = OpLoad %bool %x_125_phi
OpSelectionMerge %139 None
OpBranchConditional %138 %140 %139
%140 = OpLabel
%141 = OpLoad %int %directions
%142 = OpIAdd %int %141 %int_1
OpStore %directions %142
OpBranch %139
%139 = OpLabel
%143 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%144 = OpLoad %int %143
%146 = OpSLessThan %bool %144 %int_14
OpStore %x_145_phi %146
OpSelectionMerge %147 None
OpBranchConditional %146 %148 %147
%148 = OpLabel
%149 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%150 = OpLoad %int %149
%151 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%152 = OpLoad %int %151
%153 = OpIAdd %int %150 %int_2
%154 = OpIMul %int %152 %int_16
%155 = OpIAdd %int %153 %154
%156 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %155
%157 = OpLoad %int %156
%158 = OpIEqual %bool %157 %int_0
OpStore %x_144 %158
%159 = OpLoad %bool %x_144
OpStore %x_145_phi %159
OpBranch %147
%147 = OpLabel
%160 = OpLoad %bool %x_145_phi
OpSelectionMerge %161 None
OpBranchConditional %160 %162 %161
%162 = OpLabel
%163 = OpLoad %int %directions
%164 = OpIAdd %int %163 %int_1
OpStore %directions %164
OpBranch %161
%161 = OpLabel
%165 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%166 = OpLoad %int %165
%167 = OpSLessThan %bool %166 %int_14
OpStore %x_165_phi %167
OpSelectionMerge %168 None
OpBranchConditional %167 %169 %168
%169 = OpLabel
%170 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%171 = OpLoad %int %170
%172 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%173 = OpLoad %int %172
%174 = OpIAdd %int %173 %int_2
%175 = OpIMul %int %174 %int_16
%176 = OpIAdd %int %171 %175
%177 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %176
%178 = OpLoad %int %177
%179 = OpIEqual %bool %178 %int_0
OpStore %x_164 %179
%180 = OpLoad %bool %x_164
OpStore %x_165_phi %180
OpBranch %168
%168 = OpLabel
%181 = OpLoad %bool %x_165_phi
OpSelectionMerge %182 None
OpBranchConditional %181 %183 %182
%183 = OpLabel
%184 = OpLoad %int %directions
%185 = OpIAdd %int %184 %int_1
OpStore %directions %185
OpBranch %182
%182 = OpLabel
%213 = OpLoad %int %directions
%214 = OpIEqual %bool %213 %int_0
OpSelectionMerge %215 None
OpBranchConditional %214 %216 %217
%216 = OpLabel
OpStore %canwalk %false
OpStore %i %int_0
OpBranch %219
%219 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %220 %221 None
OpBranch %222
%222 = OpLabel
%223 = OpLoad %int %i
%225 = OpSLessThan %bool %223 %int_8
OpSelectionMerge %226 None
OpBranchConditional %225 %227 %228
%227 = OpLabel
OpBranch %226
%228 = OpLabel
OpBranch %220
%226 = OpLabel
OpStore %j %int_0
OpBranch %229
%229 = OpLabel
OpLoopMerge %230 %231 None
OpBranch %232
%232 = OpLabel
%233 = OpLoad %int %j
%234 = OpSLessThan %bool %233 %int_8
OpSelectionMerge %235 None
OpBranchConditional %234 %236 %237
%236 = OpLabel
OpBranch %235
%237 = OpLabel
OpBranch %230
%235 = OpLabel
%238 = OpLoad %int %j
%239 = OpLoad %int %i
%240 = OpIMul %int %238 %int_2
%241 = OpIMul %int %239 %int_2
%242 = OpIMul %int %241 %int_16
%243 = OpIAdd %int %240 %242
%244 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %243
%245 = OpLoad %int %244
%246 = OpIEqual %bool %245 %int_0
OpSelectionMerge %247 None
OpBranchConditional %246 %248 %247
%248 = OpLabel
%249 = OpLoad %int %j
%250 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%251 = OpIMul %int %249 %int_2
OpStore %250 %251
%252 = OpLoad %int %i
%253 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%254 = OpIMul %int %252 %int_2
OpStore %253 %254
OpStore %canwalk %true
OpBranch %247
%247 = OpLabel
OpBranch %231
%231 = OpLabel
%255 = OpLoad %int %j
%256 = OpIAdd %int %255 %int_1
OpStore %j %256
OpBranch %229
%230 = OpLabel
OpBranch %221
%221 = OpLabel
%257 = OpLoad %int %i
%258 = OpIAdd %int %257 %int_1
OpStore %i %258
OpBranch %219
%220 = OpLabel
%259 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%260 = OpLoad %int %259
%261 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%262 = OpLoad %int %261
%263 = OpIMul %int %262 %int_16
%264 = OpIAdd %int %260 %263
%265 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %264
OpStore %265 %int_1
OpBranch %215
%217 = OpLabel
%266 = OpLoad %int %v
%267 = OpLoad %int %directions
%268 = OpSMod %int %266 %267
OpStore %d %268
%269 = OpLoad %int %directions
%270 = OpLoad %int %v
%271 = OpIAdd %int %270 %269
OpStore %v %271
%272 = OpLoad %int %d
%273 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %272 %int_0
OpStore %x_230_phi %273
OpSelectionMerge %274 None
OpBranchConditional %273 %275 %274
%275 = OpLabel
%276 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%277 = OpLoad %int %276
%278 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %277 %int_0
OpStore %x_229 %278
%279 = OpLoad %bool %x_229
OpStore %x_230_phi %279
OpBranch %274
%274 = OpLabel
%280 = OpLoad %bool %x_230_phi
OpStore %x_243_phi %280
OpSelectionMerge %281 None
OpBranchConditional %280 %282 %281
%282 = OpLabel
%283 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%284 = OpLoad %int %283
%285 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%286 = OpLoad %int %285
%287 = OpISub %int %284 %int_2
%288 = OpIMul %int %286 %int_16
%289 = OpIAdd %int %287 %288
%290 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %289
%291 = OpLoad %int %290
%292 = OpIEqual %bool %291 %int_0
OpStore %x_242 %292
%293 = OpLoad %bool %x_242
OpStore %x_243_phi %293
OpBranch %281
%281 = OpLabel
%294 = OpLoad %bool %x_243_phi
OpSelectionMerge %295 None
OpBranchConditional %294 %296 %295
%296 = OpLabel
%297 = OpLoad %int %d
%298 = OpISub %int %297 %int_1
OpStore %d %298
%299 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%300 = OpLoad %int %299
%301 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%302 = OpLoad %int %301
%303 = OpIMul %int %302 %int_16
%304 = OpIAdd %int %300 %303
%305 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %304
OpStore %305 %int_1
%306 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%307 = OpLoad %int %306
%308 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%309 = OpLoad %int %308
%310 = OpISub %int %307 %int_1
%311 = OpIMul %int %309 %int_16
%312 = OpIAdd %int %310 %311
%313 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %312
OpStore %313 %int_1
%314 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%315 = OpLoad %int %314
%316 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%317 = OpLoad %int %316
%318 = OpISub %int %315 %int_2
%319 = OpIMul %int %317 %int_16
%320 = OpIAdd %int %318 %319
%321 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %320
OpStore %321 %int_1
%322 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%323 = OpLoad %int %322
%324 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%325 = OpISub %int %323 %int_2
OpStore %324 %325
OpBranch %295
%295 = OpLabel
%326 = OpLoad %int %d
%327 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %326 %int_0
OpStore %x_282_phi %327
OpSelectionMerge %328 None
OpBranchConditional %327 %329 %328
%329 = OpLabel
%330 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%331 = OpLoad %int %330
%332 = OpSGreaterThan %bool %331 %int_0
OpStore %x_281 %332
%333 = OpLoad %bool %x_281
OpStore %x_282_phi %333
OpBranch %328
%328 = OpLabel
%334 = OpLoad %bool %x_282_phi
OpSelectionMerge %335 None
OpBranchConditional %334 %336 %337
%336 = OpLabel
%338 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%339 = OpLoad %int %338
OpStore %x_288 %339
%340 = OpLoad %int %x_288
OpStore %x_290_phi %340
OpBranch %335
%337 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_289 %int_0
%341 = OpLoad %int %x_289
OpStore %x_290_phi %341
OpBranch %335
%335 = OpLabel
%342 = OpLoad %int %x_290_phi
OpSelectionMerge %343 None
OpBranchConditional %334 %344 %345
%344 = OpLabel
%346 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%347 = OpLoad %int %346
OpStore %x_295 %347
%348 = OpLoad %int %x_295
OpStore %x_297_phi %348
OpBranch %343
%345 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_296 %int_0
%349 = OpLoad %int %x_296
OpStore %x_297_phi %349
OpBranch %343
%343 = OpLabel
%350 = OpLoad %int %x_297_phi
%351 = OpISub %int %350 %int_2
%352 = OpIMul %int %351 %int_16
OpSelectionMerge %353 None
OpBranchConditional %334 %354 %355
%354 = OpLabel
%356 = OpLoad %_arr_int_uint_256 %map
OpStore %x_303 %356
%357 = OpLoad %_arr_int_uint_256 %x_303
OpStore %x_305_phi %357
OpBranch %353
%355 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_304 %358
%359 = OpLoad %_arr_int_uint_256 %x_304
OpStore %x_305_phi %359
OpBranch %353
%353 = OpLabel
%360 = OpLoad %_arr_int_uint_256 %x_305_phi
OpSelectionMerge %361 None
OpBranchConditional %334 %362 %361
%362 = OpLabel
OpStore %map %358
OpBranch %361
%361 = OpLabel
OpSelectionMerge %363 None
OpBranchConditional %334 %364 %363
%364 = OpLabel
OpStore %map %360
OpBranch %363
%363 = OpLabel
OpSelectionMerge %365 None
OpBranchConditional %334 %366 %367
%366 = OpLabel
%368 = OpIAdd %int %342 %352
%369 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %368
%370 = OpLoad %int %369
OpStore %x_315 %370
%371 = OpLoad %int %x_315
OpStore %x_317_phi %371
OpBranch %365
%367 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_316 %int_0
%372 = OpLoad %int %x_316
OpStore %x_317_phi %372
OpBranch %365
%365 = OpLabel
%373 = OpLoad %int %x_317_phi
%374 = OpIEqual %bool %373 %int_0
%375 = OpSelect %bool %334 %374 %334
OpSelectionMerge %376 None
OpBranchConditional %375 %377 %376
%377 = OpLabel
%378 = OpLoad %int %d
%379 = OpISub %int %378 %int_1
OpStore %d %379
%380 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%381 = OpLoad %int %380
%382 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%383 = OpLoad %int %382
%384 = OpIMul %int %383 %int_16
%385 = OpIAdd %int %381 %384
%386 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %385
OpStore %386 %int_1
%387 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%388 = OpLoad %int %387
%389 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%390 = OpLoad %int %389
%391 = OpISub %int %390 %int_1
%392 = OpIMul %int %391 %int_16
%393 = OpIAdd %int %388 %392
%394 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %393
OpStore %394 %int_1
%395 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%396 = OpLoad %int %395
%397 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%398 = OpLoad %int %397
%399 = OpLoad %_arr_int_uint_256 %map
OpStore %map %358
OpStore %map %399
%400 = OpISub %int %398 %int_2
%401 = OpIMul %int %400 %int_16
%402 = OpIAdd %int %396 %401
%403 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %402
OpStore %403 %int_1
%404 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%405 = OpLoad %int %404
%406 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%407 = OpISub %int %405 %int_2
OpStore %406 %407
OpBranch %376
%376 = OpLabel
%408 = OpLoad %int %d
%409 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %408 %int_0
OpStore %x_360_phi %409
OpSelectionMerge %410 None
OpBranchConditional %409 %411 %410
%411 = OpLabel
%412 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%413 = OpLoad %int %412
%414 = OpSLessThan %bool %413 %int_14
OpStore %x_359 %414
%415 = OpLoad %bool %x_359
OpStore %x_360_phi %415
OpBranch %410
%410 = OpLabel
%416 = OpLoad %bool %x_360_phi
OpStore %x_373_phi %416
OpSelectionMerge %417 None
OpBranchConditional %416 %418 %417
%418 = OpLabel
%419 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%420 = OpLoad %int %419
%421 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%422 = OpLoad %int %421
%423 = OpIAdd %int %420 %int_2
%424 = OpIMul %int %422 %int_16
%425 = OpIAdd %int %423 %424
%426 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %425
%427 = OpLoad %int %426
%428 = OpIEqual %bool %427 %int_0
OpStore %x_372 %428
%429 = OpLoad %bool %x_372
OpStore %x_373_phi %429
OpBranch %417
%417 = OpLabel
%430 = OpLoad %bool %x_373_phi
OpSelectionMerge %431 None
OpBranchConditional %430 %432 %431
%432 = OpLabel
%433 = OpLoad %int %d
%434 = OpISub %int %433 %int_1
OpStore %d %434
%435 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%436 = OpLoad %int %435
%437 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%438 = OpLoad %int %437
%439 = OpIMul %int %438 %int_16
%440 = OpIAdd %int %436 %439
%441 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %440
OpStore %441 %int_1
%442 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%443 = OpLoad %int %442
%444 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%445 = OpLoad %int %444
%446 = OpIAdd %int %443 %int_1
%447 = OpIMul %int %445 %int_16
%448 = OpIAdd %int %446 %447
%449 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %448
OpStore %449 %int_1
%450 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%451 = OpLoad %int %450
%452 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%453 = OpLoad %int %452
%454 = OpIAdd %int %451 %int_2
%455 = OpIMul %int %453 %int_16
%456 = OpIAdd %int %454 %455
%457 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %456
OpStore %457 %int_1
%458 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%459 = OpLoad %int %458
%460 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%461 = OpIAdd %int %459 %int_2
OpStore %460 %461
OpBranch %431
%431 = OpLabel
%462 = OpLoad %int %d
%463 = OpSGreaterThanEqual %bool %462 %int_0
OpStore %x_412_phi %463
OpSelectionMerge %464 None
OpBranchConditional %463 %465 %464
%465 = OpLabel
%466 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%467 = OpLoad %int %466
%468 = OpSLessThan %bool %467 %int_14
OpStore %x_411 %468
%469 = OpLoad %bool %x_411
OpStore %x_412_phi %469
OpBranch %464
%464 = OpLabel
%470 = OpLoad %bool %x_412_phi
OpStore %x_425_phi %470
OpSelectionMerge %471 None
OpBranchConditional %470 %472 %471
%472 = OpLabel
%473 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%474 = OpLoad %int %473
%475 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%476 = OpLoad %int %475
%477 = OpIAdd %int %476 %int_2
%478 = OpIMul %int %477 %int_16
%479 = OpIAdd %int %474 %478
%480 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %479
%481 = OpLoad %int %480
%482 = OpIEqual %bool %481 %int_0
OpStore %x_424 %482
%483 = OpLoad %bool %x_424
OpStore %x_425_phi %483
OpBranch %471
%471 = OpLabel
%484 = OpLoad %bool %x_425_phi
OpSelectionMerge %485 None
OpBranchConditional %484 %486 %485
%486 = OpLabel
%487 = OpLoad %int %d
%488 = OpISub %int %487 %int_1
OpStore %d %488
%489 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%490 = OpLoad %int %489
%491 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%492 = OpLoad %int %491
%493 = OpIMul %int %492 %int_16
%494 = OpIAdd %int %490 %493
%495 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %494
OpStore %495 %int_1
%496 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%497 = OpLoad %int %496
%498 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%499 = OpLoad %int %498
%500 = OpIAdd %int %499 %int_1
%501 = OpIMul %int %500 %int_16
%502 = OpIAdd %int %497 %501
%503 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %502
OpStore %503 %int_1
%504 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_0
%505 = OpLoad %int %504
%506 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%507 = OpLoad %int %506
%508 = OpIAdd %int %507 %int_2
%509 = OpIMul %int %508 %int_16
%510 = OpIAdd %int %505 %509
%511 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %510
OpStore %511 %int_1
%512 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%513 = OpLoad %int %512
%514 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %p %uint_1
%515 = OpIAdd %int %513 %int_2
OpStore %514 %515
OpBranch %485
%485 = OpLabel
OpBranch %215
%215 = OpLabel
%516 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %ipos %uint_1
%517 = OpLoad %int %516
%518 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Function_int %ipos %uint_0
%519 = OpLoad %int %518
%520 = OpIMul %int %517 %int_16
%521 = OpIAdd %int %520 %519
%522 = OpAccessChain %_ptr_Private_int %map %521
%523 = OpLoad %int %522
%524 = OpIEqual %bool %523 %int_1
OpSelectionMerge %525 None
OpBranchConditional %524 %526 %525
%526 = OpLabel
OpStore %x_GLF_color %528
OpReturn
%525 = OpLabel
OpBranch %87
%87 = OpLabel
%529 = OpLoad %bool %canwalk
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpBranchConditional %529 %85 %86
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
%86 = OpLabel
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
OpStore %x_GLF_color %531
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%main_inner = OpFunction %main_out None %532
%gl_FragCoord_param = OpFunctionParameter %v4float
spir-writer: handle break continuing block The continuing block can exit the loop in very constrained ways: When a break statement is placed such that it would exit from a loop’s § 7.3.8 Continuing Statement, then: - The break statement must appear as either: - The only statement in the if clause of an if statement that has: - no else clause or an empty else clause - no elseif clauses - The only statement in the else clause of an if statement that has an empty if clause and no elseif clauses. - That if statement must appear last in the continuing clause. By design, this allows a lossless round-trip from SPIR-V to WGSL and back to SPIR-V. But that requires this special case construct in WGSL to be translated to an OpBranchConditional with one target being the loop's megre block (which is where 'break' branches to), and the other targets the loop header (which is the loop backedge). That OpBranchConditional takes the place of the normal case of an unconditional backedge. Avoids errors like this: continue construct with the continue target X is not post dominated by the back-edge block Y Fixed: 1034 Change-Id: If472a179380b8d77af746a3cd8e279c8a5e56b37 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59800 Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-27 15:12:27 +00:00
%536 = OpLabel
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
OpStore %gl_FragCoord %gl_FragCoord_param
%537 = OpFunctionCall %void %main_1
%538 = OpLoad %v4float %x_GLF_color
%539 = OpCompositeConstruct %main_out %538
OpReturnValue %539
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpFunctionEnd
%main = OpFunction %void None %22
spirv: Use generic transform to process shader IO The refactored CanonicalizeEntryPointIO transform makes it much easier to handle SPIR-V style IO as well, and doing this removes a lot of duplicated code. Remove all of the SPIR-V transform code for shader IO and vertex point size. Bug: tint:920 Change-Id: Id1b97517619b4d2fd09b45d5aee848259f3dfa77 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60840 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-08-05 17:34:19 +00:00
%541 = OpLabel
%543 = OpLoad %v4float %gl_FragCoord_param_1
%542 = OpFunctionCall %main_out %main_inner %543
%544 = OpCompositeExtract %v4float %542 0
OpStore %x_GLF_color_1_1 %544
Add tests derived from VK-GL-CTS This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit 571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was followed: - Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were identified - All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and converted into SPIR-V binaries - The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary - Duplicate binaries were removed - spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining binary, with duplicates discarded - Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded - Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were put aside for further investigation - SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in this CL - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these SPIR-V assembly tests - Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL again, as a WGLSL test - test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again, to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540 Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842 Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
2021-07-23 13:10:12 +00:00
OpReturn
OpFunctionEnd