If a WGSL test contains no entry points, add an empty one.
In that case, do not pass its name to the generator, so we
generate code for all functions, so they aren't culled for
reachability.
Add new test results for formerly empty tests.
Bug: tint:1376
Change-Id: Ibf371b943fb273d44712dfcc9dc1b7bb4ab071db
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76540
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
Deprecate the old syntax. Migrate everything to the new syntax.
Bug: tint:1382
Change-Id: Ide12b2e927b17dc93b9714c7049090864cc568d3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77260
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Most of this change is fixing up the numerious tests that violated this rule.
Fixed: tint:1365
Issue: tint:1374
Change-Id: I38da27c7367277fe60857208170fec017e80bd25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76400
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
PromoteInitializersToConstVar was erroring on for loops that contained array or structure constructor expressions.
Added lots more tests.
Fixed: tint:1364
Change-Id: I033eaad94756ea496fc8bc5f03f39c6dba4e3a88
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75580
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
All failures are now SKIP'ed.
Bug: tint:1358
Change-Id: If04d57b9e0b71dd877468b5dc277fbff82f36692
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75220
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
FXC fails to compile code that assigns to dynamically-indexed fixed-size
arrays in structs on internal shader variables with:
error X3500: array reference cannot be used as an l-value; not natively
addressable
This CL detects this case, and transforms such assignments into copying
out the array to a local variable, assigning to that local, and then
copying the array back.
Also manually regenerate SKIPs for HLSL/FXC after this change, which
fixes 30 tests. Also exposes some "compilation aborted unexpectedly" now
that "array reference cannot be used as an l-value" has been fixed. For
tests that fail for both DXC and FXC, updating SKIPs to the DXC one to
help distinguish actual FXC bugs from valid errors.
Bug: tint:998
Bug: tint:1206
Change-Id: I09204d8d81ab27d1c257538ad702414ccc386543
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71620
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Skipping those that are block-decorated is not correct, as
block-decorated structures can also have non-buffer usages. This is
even clearer now that WGSL has removed the block attribute.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I6484766a5c541d39e2dc08beb3ae7b889759a3fb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72083
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Migrate some of the validation logic over to use the results of behavior
analysis.
The most significant changes are:
* Unreachable-statements now consider merge-points of control flow. For
example, if all branches of a if-statement or switch-statement either
return or discard, the next statement will be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements are no longer an error, but a warning. See
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/2378.
* Statements that follow a loops that does not break, or have a
conditional will now be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements produced by the SPIR-V reader are now removed
using the new RemoveUnreachableStatements transform.
Some other new changes include additional validation for the continuing
block for for-loops, to match the rules of a loop continuing block.
The new cases this validation is testing for are not expressible in
WGSL, but some transforms may produce complex continuing statements that
might violate these rules. All the writers are able to decay these
complex for-loop continuing statements to regular loops.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: I0d8a48c73d5d5c30a1cddf92cc3383a692a58e61
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71500
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Now that I've landed this change to Dawn to disable FXC optimizations:
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70700,, we can reland this
change. The Tint-into-Dawn roll was failing because FXC would miscompile
certain loops into infinite loops when not unrolled.
Also reland
test/bug/fxc/gradient_in_varying_loop/1112.wgsl.expected.hlsl
Bug: tint:1112
Bug: dawn:1203
Change-Id: I641d68864b833e0fbe3b117d397b89ae96482536
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71000
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This reverts commit 11d09f2fe7.
Reason for revert: Failing roll of Tint to Dawn: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70100
Original change's description:
> HLSL: force FXC to never unroll loops
>
> Emit the "[loop]" attribute on "for" and "while" so that FXC does not
> attempt to unroll them. This is to work around an FXC bug where it fails
> to unroll loops with gradient operations.
>
> FXC ostensibly unrolls such loops because gradient operations require
> uniform control flow, and loops that have varying iterations may
> possibly not be uniform. Tint will eventually validate that control flow
> is indeed uniform, so forcing FXC to avoid unrolling in these cases
> should be fine.
>
> Bug: tint:1112
> Change-Id: I10077f8b62fbbb230a0003f3864c75a8fe0e1d18
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69880
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: I8e8f3c0abfa6e6bc5d0e67af9428a46ef867d5c1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70540
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Emit the "[loop]" attribute on "for" and "while" so that FXC does not
attempt to unroll them. This is to work around an FXC bug where it fails
to unroll loops with gradient operations.
FXC ostensibly unrolls such loops because gradient operations require
uniform control flow, and loops that have varying iterations may
possibly not be uniform. Tint will eventually validate that control flow
is indeed uniform, so forcing FXC to avoid unrolling in these cases
should be fine.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: I10077f8b62fbbb230a0003f3864c75a8fe0e1d18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/69880
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
In HLSL code, if a switch statement has only a default case, FXC will
effectively ignore the code in that case. In this change, we detect this
and work around it by emitting the code in the default block without the
switch.
Bug: tint:1188
Change-Id: I69b405cdb4c669fb093eb49aa138923419dcf8f8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68440
Kokoro: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
This removes a lot of awkward logic from the MSL writer, and means
that we now handle all module-scope variables with the same transform.
Change-Id: I782e36a4b88dafbc3f8364f7caa7f95c6ae3f5f1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/67643
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This reverts commit e5dbe24e94.
Reason for revert: Makes the Tint-Dawn roll fails because of
MSL compilation errors on as_type<uint>(-2147483648):
as_type cast from 'long' to 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') is not allowed
as_type<uint>(-2147483647) compiles fine, so this is most
likely because the MSL compiler types the literal as a long
(since without the - it is larger than the max int32).
Original change's description:
> MSL writer: make signed int overflow defined behaviour
>
> Bug: tint:124
> Change-Id: Icf545b633d6390ceb7f639e80111390005e311a1
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60100
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
TBR=dneto@google.com,bclayton@google.com,jrprice@google.com,amaiorano@google.com,noreply+kokoro@google.com,tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I3e3384a9185013bb141a1b7b9b22bad8571bbc50
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: tint:124
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60345
Reviewed-by: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Stephen White
Ben Clayton
James Price
Antonio Maiorano
Corentin Wallez