This change validates that the operand types and result type of every
binary operation is valid.
* Added two unit tests which test all valid and invalid param combos. I
also removed the old tests, many of which failed once I added this
validation, and the rest are obviated by the new tests.
* Fixed VertexPulling transform, as well as many tests, that were using
invalid operand types for binary operations.
Fixed: tint:354
Change-Id: Ia3f48384256993da61b341f17ba5583741011819
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44341
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Added enforcement for vector constructor type rules according to the
table in https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl.html#type-constructor-expr.
This surfaced a number of existing tests that violated some of these
rules or had a type-declaration related bug, so this CL fixes those as
well (these tests either passed the incorrect number of arguments to a
vector constructor or relied on implicit conversions between numeric
types).
Fixed: tint:632
Fixed: tint:476
Change-Id: I8279be3eeae50b64db486ee7a91a43bd94fdff62
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44480
Commit-Queue: Arman Uguray <armansito@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Let's keep these for the SPIR-V reader case. The way things currently work is actually nicer than attempting to generate size / align decorations in the SPIR-V reader.
Change-Id: I83087c153e3b3056e737dcfbfd73ae6a0986bd7c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44684
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This was broken by a rebase of the Default Struct Layout change.
This went unnoticed because there was no test coverage for these. Added.
Also replace `[[offset(n)]]` decorations with padding fields.
Bug: tint:626
Change-Id: Iad6f1a239bc8d8fcb15d18a204d3f5a78a372350
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44683
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This makes it a little easier to check if an object is one of any of the
types provided. Updated Type query functions to make use of IsAnyOf.
Added tests.
Change-Id: I12ea62b32042b6675d998ab85b86f2fe15861330
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44462
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Add a sanitizing transform to collect input parameters into a
struct. HLSL does not allow non-struct entry-point parameters, so any
location- or builtin-decorated inputs have to be provided via a struct
instead.
Bug: tint:511
Change-Id: I3784bcad3bfda757ebcf0efc98c499cfce639b5e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44420
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This will allow Tint's dependent to depend on libtint without GN
discovering Tint's test and try to build them. In particular it will
help use Tint in Dawn in Skia's standalone build which doesn't have
//testing.
Bug: dawn:706
Change-Id: Idd28662b89aa75df7704eaae205328dce0b96fef
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44540
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Remove the decoration groupings (Array, Function, Struct,
StructMember, Type, Variable), such that all *Decoration classes now
subclass ast::Decoration directly. This allows for decorations to be
used in multiple places; for example, builtin decorations are now
valid for both variables and struct members.
Checking that decoration lists only contain decorations that are valid
for the node that they are attached to is now done inside the
validator.
Change-Id: Ie8c0e53e5730a7dedea50a1dec8f26f9e7b00e8d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44320
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
The readers must not produce invalid ASTs.
If readers cannot produce a valid AST, then they should error instead.
If a reader does produce an invalid AST, this change catches this bad behavior early, significantly helping identify the root of the broken logic.
IsValid() made a bit more sense in the days where the AST was mutable, and was constructed by calling setters on the nodes to build up the tree.
In order to detect bad ASTs, IsValid() would have to perform an entire AST traversal and give a yes / no answer for the entire tree. Not only was this slow, an answer of 'no' didn't tell you *where* the AST was invalid, resulting in a lot of manual debugging.
Now that the AST is fully immutable, all child nodes need to be built before their parents. The AST node constructors now become a perfect place to perform pointer sanity checking.
The argument for attempting to catch and handle invalid ASTs is not a compelling one.
Invalid ASTs are invalid compiler behavior, not something that should ever happen with a correctly functioning compiler.
If this were to happen in production, the user would be utterly clueless to _why_ the program is invalid, or _how_ to fix it.
Attempting to handle invalid ASTs is just masking a much larger problem.
Let's just let the fuzzers do their job to catch any of these cases early.
Fixed: chromium:1185569
Change-Id: I6496426a3a9da9d42627d2c1ca23917bfd04cc5c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44048
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
* Disable "undefined-var-template" in code, rather than in build files
* Add back some missing headers required when building in this context
* Make sure gtest/gmock do not override the default runtime library
Change-Id: I12c05943fc1d2dee4733ae70db7da026f67e0dad
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44180
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Make sure variables from the loop block remain in scope for
continuing block. Note that we need to do this because the continuing
block is a sibling of the loop body block in the AST, rather than a
child.
Added test.
Fixed: tint:526
Change-Id: If622995e3aac4cd3c06c2dbd87ffcaa36b0f09c5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/43680
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
All includes from .cc to .h are preserved, even when transitively included.
It's clear that there are far too many includes in header files, and we should be more aggressive with forward declarations. tint:532 will continue to track this work.
There are, however, plenty of includes that have accumulated over time which are no longer required directly or transitively, so this change starts with a clean slate of *required* includes.
Bug: tint:532
Change-Id: Ie1718dad565f8309fa180ef91bcf3920e76dba18
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44042
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
We now keep track of scopes as a tree of BlockInfos that track variables
declared in each scope. For loop scopes, we store the index of the first
variable (if any) that follows the first continue statement. Using this
data structure, when parsing expressions, we validate that used
variables in continuing blocks are not bypassed by a continue statement
in the parent loop block.
Also:
* Validate that continue statements are in a loop in TD. This error is
already caught by the spir-v writer, but better to catch it here.
* Add more utility functions to ProgramBuilder to make it easier to
write tests
Fixed: tint:17
Change-Id: I967bf2cfb63062bac8dcca113d074ba0fe2152e2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/44120
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
