This is no longer used.
Fixed: tint:1225
Change-Id: I0cfe9955687a2b7ded3e645c573f3bffbc2f1f84
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/66380
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
These return weird names that love the use of '__' and have little relation to WGSL.
Improve the duplicate case error message.
Clean up control_block_validation_test.cc by making used of the ProgramBuilder helpers.
Bug: tint:1225
Change-Id: I8c4cf3943145cf8372c00d33ae0166c0c0bcbb8b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/66442
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Attach the error to the continue statement, and add notes to show
where the variable is both declared and used.
Change-Id: Ie9939a5ca674e7216069bbb1d8dc82ab6949367c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/65521
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
An expression that is inside an if-statement condition does not have a
"current block", which is what we were using to see if the usage was
inside a continuing block. Use the current statement to find the
containing block instead.
Fixed: chromium:1251664
Change-Id: Icc808ca1cf6a1b51757da8303901fa5ecb693e83
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/65520
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Will requires updating the WGSL spec, which currently has rules looser than SPIR-V.
Fixed: tint:1167
Bug: chromium:1246163
Change-Id: Ie8fcfabc0bb89c7fb69c345475ff99c07fa04172
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/63560
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This CL changes the way that the resolver traverses expressions to avoid stack overflows for deeply nested expressions.
Instead of having the expression resolver methods call back into
Expression(), add a TraverseExpressions() method that collects all the
expression nodes with a simple DFS.
This currently only changes the way that Expressions are traversed. We
may need to do the same for statements.
Bug: chromium:1246375
Change-Id: Ie81905da1b790b6dd1df9f1ac42e06593d397c21
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/63700
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Calls to functions and intrinsics that do not return a value must only be used by a call statement.
Fixed: chromium:1241460
Change-Id: I0f940c942b55a5212367dbf9e261083beb4560ec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62440
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The type of a type constructor must be constructible, which forbids
atomics. Add checks for non-constructible types when validating arrays
and structures, and then error on any type that isn't explicitly
matched in the outer function. Replaces the separate check for
pointers, which is no longer necessary.
This also removes the validation for "an expression must not evaluate
to an atomic type". The only test that we had for this is no longer
valid (since the type constructor it used is now rejected). There are
no other ways of hitting this particular error, since other validation
rules will always kick in first.
Change-Id: I2172b57ee4e8ee3066aaf0cedc4a26aaca642376
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/61800
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
It wasn't unwrapping the reference before type checking
Change-Id: I4bfc038c468c32c2a164bbcbef0a97a3e385d5ba
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60210
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
- function scope variable store type must be constructible
- add IsConstructible() to sem::atomic
Bug: tint:1069
Change-Id: Ib0616b486ecf278dbdd99640dc4ede7f3007feb8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60120
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Each argument of a function call of pointer type must be one of:
- An address-of expression of a variable identifier expression
- A function parameter
Also added source location to duplicate struct member name unittest
Bug: tint:983
Change-Id: Ic5ab010b2ed76207a1d8d3ef9f66140ea95f7e72
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58480
Auto-Submit: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Check they do not contain returns, discards
Check they do not directly contain continues, however a nested loop can have its own continue.
Bug: chromium:1229976
Change-Id: Ia3c4ac118ffdaa6cca6025366c19f9897718c930
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58384
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
We've decided that these will be omitted for now.
Move the check-spec-examples script into the tools/src directory, and update the go modules.
Add a bash script to build and run this.
Change-Id: I852f8ddb1b9b987410a2a49cf6d14e54c3cf3f0e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56381
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Use a DisableValidationDecoration to allow these storage classes only
for variables generated by the SPIR-V sanitizer. This is also used in
the Inspector tests, since the Inspector is currently run *after* the
SPIR-V sanitizer. These tests will be removed when this is no longer
the case.
Also validate that builtin/location decorations are not used on
variables (unless they have input/output storage class).
Fix or delete all of the other tests that were wrongly using these
storage classes and attributes.
Bug: tint:697
Change-Id: I8be7fb16191f5e2bed9f7dfb700e51f3b97fd1fe
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55862
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This reverts commit 6330260f7d0e7322d1162fdd84ff2e6a8db76ab9.
Reason for revert: Need by this CL which was also reverted:
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55402
Original change's description:
> Validate that in/out storage classes are not used
>
> Use a DisableValidationDecoration to allow these storage classes only
> for variables generated by the SPIR-V sanitizer.
>
> Fix or delete all of the tests that were wrongly using these storage
> classes.
>
> Bug: tint:697
> Change-Id: Ife1154f687b18529cfcc7a0ed93407fd25c9868e
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55404
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
TBR=bclayton@google.com,jrprice@google.com,noreply+kokoro@google.com,tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I54db99d6d0fdf28c27a1f2b9858b84f5cd197409
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: tint:697
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55660
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Use a DisableValidationDecoration to allow these storage classes only
for variables generated by the SPIR-V sanitizer.
Fix or delete all of the tests that were wrongly using these storage
classes.
Bug: tint:697
Change-Id: Ife1154f687b18529cfcc7a0ed93407fd25c9868e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/55404
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1801
indexes must be of type 'i32' or 'u32'
Bug: tint:867
Change-Id: Ie5bfacf87af5a06d5428dc510145e96fb156c42e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/54720
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Sarah Mashayekhi <sarahmashay@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Move these module-scope variables to entry point parameters and pass
them as arguments to functions that use them. Disable entry point IO
validation for them.
Emit [[texture()]] and [[sampler()]] attributes on these entry point
parameters.
Fixed: tint:145
Change-Id: I936a80801875a5d0b6cd98a2e8f3e297a2f53509
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53961
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
- Add resolver/call_test.cc for new unit tests, and move a couple that
were in resolver/validation_test.cc to it
- Fix CalculateArrayLength transform so that it passes the address of
the u32 it creates to the internal function
- Fix tests broken as a result of this change
Bug: tint:664
Change-Id: If713f9828790cd51224d2392d42c01c0057cb652
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53920
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
TypeDecls (alias, structure) are not a types - they declare types.
ast::TypeName is what's used for a ast::Type.
Previously we were trying to automatically convert these to TypeNames in the builder, but having these inherit from ast::Type was extremely error prone.
reader/spirv was actually constructing ast::Structs and using them as types, which is invalid.
Change-Id: I05773ad6d488626606019015b84217a5a55a8e8a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53802
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Combines the calls to ty.alias() and AST().AddConstructedType()
Change-Id: I84eaf6275d37141cf8973db7e04d25d9cb9c6351
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53801
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
and allow them in any order.
We're about to add Yet Another optional parameter - access control.
For style, we probably want this field before the decorations, however
that means adding more default values for all the cases where we don't
need to specify the access control.
Instead use some template magic to allow extra parameters to be
specified in any order, and entirely optional, with sensible defaults.
This keeps things readable and without huge code refactorings.
Bug: tint:846
Change-Id: I4f61eb765de63ad98ae786d187d2bd1b42942756
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53087
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
You've helped us bridge two worlds.
Good Night, Sweet Prince.
Fixed: tint:724
Change-Id: I0b4ba960e9cf5dcff7df9d2f332ea36d6663c440
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51667
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This change implements pointers and references as described by the WGSL
specification change in https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1569.
reader/spirv:
* Now emits address-of `&expr` and indirection `*expr` operators as
needed.
* As an identifier may now resolve to a pointer or reference type
depending on whether the declaration is a `var`, `let` or
parameter, `Function::identifier_values_` has been changed from
an ID set to an ID -> Type* map.
resolver:
* Now correctly resolves all expressions to either a value type,
reference type or pointer type.
* Validates pointer / reference rules on assignment, `var` and `let`
construction, and usage.
* Handles the address-of and indirection operators.
* No longer does any implicit loads of pointer types.
* Storage class validation is still TODO (crbug.com/tint/809)
writer/spirv:
* Correctly handles variables and expressions of pointer and
reference types, emitting OpLoads where necessary.
test:
* Lots of new test cases
Fixed: tint:727
Change-Id: I77d3281590e35e5a3122f5b74cdeb71a6fe51f74
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50740
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
In preparation for implementing
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/1604, this change removes the
sem::AccessControl node. Instead, the ast::AccessControl::Access enum is
now on the sem::StorageTexture class, as well as on sem::Variable. For
sem::Variable, the field is set when the variable's type is either a
storage buffer or a storage texture.
Bug: tint:802
Change-Id: Id479af36b401d067b015027923f4e715f5f69f25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/51020
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Variable() is called for globals, locals and parameters. Much of the logic is the same.
Move all the common logic down into Variable(). This:
* Removes some yucky default parameters
* Adds type validation that was missing for globals (broken tests fixed)
* Gives me a single place to implement the Reference type wrapping
Bug: tint:727
Change-Id: I70f4a3603d7fa781da938508aa2a1bc80ec15d77
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50580
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Validate that:
* That resource variables have resource bindings
* Only resource variables have resource bindings
* That a [[binding]] decoration is paired with a [[group]]
* That binding points are not reused in the same entry point
Fixed: tint:235
Fixed: tint:645
Bug: tint:645
Change-Id: I2542934b4c6a2b4bbde48242932c04c796033a90
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50500
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
We don't want the WGSL parser to have to maintain type lookups.
If the WGSL language is updated to allow module-scope variables to be declared in any order, then the single-pass approach is going to fail horribly.
Instead do the check in the Resovler.
With this change, the AST nodes actually contain the correctly declared storage class.
Fix up the SPIR-V reader to generate StorageClass::kNone for handle types.
Fix all tests.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I102e30c9bbef32de40e123c2676ea9a281dee74d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50306
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
With the parsers now using ast::Types, nothing should be producing these any more.
This change also removes Resolver::Canonical(), which is now unneeded as there are no sem::Aliases to remove.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I0c1a49f49372c1fcc37864502f07c5c76328d471
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/50304
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Remove all sem::Type references from the AST.
ConstructedTypes are now all AST types.
The parsers will still create semantic types, but these are now disjoint
and ignored.
The parsers will be updated with future changes to stop creating these
semantic types.
Resolver creates semantic types from the AST types. Most downstream
logic continues to use the semantic types, however transforms will now
need to rebuild AST type information instead of reassigning semantic
information, as semantic nodes are fully rebuilt by the Resolver.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I4ce03a075f13c77648cda5c3691bae202752ecc5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49747
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Register all aliases, and don't share type nodes
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I7ac20c8a75f232fa7fe1e8c1a5690f411888f6e4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49750
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
A literal has an implicit type, so there should be no type on the AST node.
This highlighted that the resolver was nto canonicalizing TypeConstructorExpression types, which has been fixed.
This required preservation of the declared type name in order for error messages to contain aliased names.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: I21594a3e8a0fb1b73c6c5b46a14b8664b7f28512
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/49345
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Used as a stepping stone to emitting the ast::Types instead.
Bug: tint:724
Change-Id: Ib2d6c150fe8aa7c1e2c502676922b14b1518a4be
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48686
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
A general code cleanup
Change-Id: Ib251ca2d4b71f75736bdba8b4255965593a76c31
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/48680
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
