Add end to end tests
Fixed: tint:1026
Change-Id: I10813cbe6dc4f1bccddf9a8a29e3a249a364c051
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59663
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Also move:
test/fxc_bugs/vector_assignment_in_loop
to
test/bug/fxc/vector_assignment_in_loop
Change-Id: I7bbfc476fdb7a3296025609625e322fed8d16285
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59444
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Implement these for all the writers.
SPIR-V reader not implemented (the old overloads weren't implemented either).
Deprecate the old overloads.
Fixed: tint:54
Change-Id: If66d26dbac3389ff604734f31b426abe47868b91
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59302
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This adds SPIR-V assembly and WGSL tests derived from VK-GL-CTS commit
571256871c2e2f03995373e1e4a02958d8cd8cf5. The following procedure was
followed:
- Those .amber files in VK-GL-CTS wholly owned by Google were
identified
- All GLSL and SPIR-V shaders were extracted from the Amber files and
converted into SPIR-V binaries
- The compact-ids pass of spirv-opt was applied to each binary
- Duplicate binaries were removed
- spirv-opt -O was used to obtain an optimized version of each remaining
binary, with duplicates discarded
- Binaries that failed validation using spirv-val with target
environment SPIR-V 1.3 were discarded
- Those binaries that tint could not successfully convert into WGSL were
put aside for further investigation
- SPIR-V assembly versions of the remaining binaries are included in
this CL
- test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used to
generate expected .spvasm, .msl, .hlsl and .wgsl outputs for these
SPIR-V assembly tests
- Each successfully-generated .expected.wgsl is included in this CL
again, as a WGLSL test
- test-runner with -generate-expected and -generate-skip was used again,
to generate expected outputs for these WGSL tests
Change-Id: Ibe9baf2729cf97e0b633db9a426f53362a5de540
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58842
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1945 changes the SPIR-V mapping of this operator so that it now maps to OpFRem instead of OpFMod. Polyfill OpFMod with `x - y * floor(x / y)`
Also map the MSL output of this operator to use `fmod()`.
Behavior of this operator is now consistent across all backends.
Fixed: tint:945
Fixed: tint:977
Fixed: tint:1010
Change-Id: Iefa009b905989c55ace24e073ab0e261c7cf69b0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58393
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Change-Id: Ied931db182c11f26bffda4900641e41a1e9b5ee8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59027
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
A hypothetical case discussed in the WG call, which I wasn't entirely sure was going to work. It does.
Change-Id: I855f1e02af2fe62214e3fb964f6937e3d88016eb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/59021
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The only non-trivial case is SPIR-V, which generates OpSelect to
choose between 1 or 0.
Fixed: tint:997
Change-Id: Ifda7b3ec1e0a713843a2da7ed59c3449d4eec8bd
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58521
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
The TypeConstructorExpression logic that tested for splats was not considering references. This led to broken emission for the SPIR-V and HLSL backends.
Fixed: tint:992
Change-Id: I9824b71f526997f91d380c09b459f4fd73065b19
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58397
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Tests should be as fine-grained as possible.
Not all the permutations were covered.
Not all the backends were actually generating anything useful, as the
functions were not called by an entry point.
Change-Id: I76658533d3112d202f7482a19531079550e66f83
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58392
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Arrays can be extremely large, and having the load and store functions unroll the elements can make the complier explode.
Fixed: chromium:1229233
Change-Id: Ieb5654254e16f5ce724a205d21d954ef9a0cd053
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58382
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
For loop initializers and continuing statements do not have a BlockStatement as their parent.
Handle removal of these statements with a new Transform::RemoveStatement() helper
Fixed: tint:990
Change-Id: I24e7b18dcf71d3ef0a4d3ee68b9f68518e0eb5e8
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58063
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Much like sem::Type, it greatly simplifies downstream logic if we can compare sem::Intrinsic pointers to know if they refer to the same intrinsic overload.
Change-Id: If236247cd3979bbde821d9294f304ab85ba4938e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58061
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
And call these helpers instead of inlining complex statements.
Cleans up output, and helps prevent for-loops decaying to while loops.
Change-Id: I6ac31b18ce6c5fac0e54e982f7db3bb298f7edb2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58060
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
CloneContext::Replace(T* what, T* with) is bug-prone, as complex transforms may want to clone `what` multiple times, or not at all. In both cases, this will likely result in an ICE as either the replacement will be reachable multiple times, or not at all.
The CTS test: webgpu:shader,execution,robust_access:linear_memory:storageClass="storage";storageMode="read_write";access="read";atomic=true;baseType="i32"
Was triggering this brokenness with DecomposeMemoryAccess's use of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*).
Switch the usage of CloneContext::Replace(T*, T*) to the new function form.
As std::function is copyable, it cannot hold a captured std::unique_ptr.
This prevented the Replace() lambdas from capturing the necessary `BufferAccess` data, as this held a `std::unique_ptr<Offset>`.
To fix this, use a `BlockAllocator` for Offsets, and use raw pointers instead.
Because the function passed to Replace() is called just before the node is cloned, insertion of new functions will occur just before the currently evaluated module-scope entity.
This allows us to remove the "insert_after" arguments to LoadFunc(), StoreFunc(), and AtomicFunc().
We can also kill the icky InsertGlobal() and TypeDeclOf() helpers.
Bug: tint:993
Change-Id: I60972bc13a2fa819a163ee2671f61e82d0e68d2a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58222
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is a reland of fd5829e5ea
Original change's description:
> Validate storage class constraints
>
> As defined by https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#storage-class-layout-constraints
>
> Bug: tint:643
> Change-Id: I9c78ba69a792a80c263a17b0a6e9b4810fdb7f30
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56780
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Bug: tint:643
Change-Id: I62036d615a062597339a9d130b7ccf49b5be26c7
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58120
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This uses FXC compilation failure mitigation for _any_ vector index assignment that has a non-constant index. FXC can still fall over if the loop calls a function that performs the dynamic index.
Use some vector swizzle logic to avoid branches in the helper.
Fixed: tint:980
Change-Id: I2a759d88a7d884bc61b4631cf57feb4acc8178de
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57882
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
The UBO must have a stride that is a multiple of 16 bytes.
Note that this change was part of https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56780
but the CL was reverted because it broke Dawn. This CL relands part of
the change, and adds the macro TINT_EXPECTS_UBOS_TO_BE_MULTIPLE_OF_16 so
that Dawn can conditionally compile against it.
Bug: tint:984
Bug: tint:643
Change-Id: I303b3fe81ff97c4933c489736d5d5432a59ce9b7
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57921
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This change introduces sem::CompoundStatement, a new base class for
statements that can hold other statements.
sem::BlockStatements now derives from sem::CompoundStatement, and
this change introduces the following new CompoundStatements:
* `sem::IfStatement`
* `sem::ElseStatement`
* `sem::ForLoopStatement`
* `sem::LoopStatement`
* `sem::SwitchStatement`.
These new CompoundStatements are now inserted into the semantic
tree as now documented in `docs/compound_statements.md`.
The `sem::BlockStatement::FindFirstParent()` methods have been
moved down to `sem::Statement`.
The `Resolver::BlockScope()` method has been replaced with
`Resolver::Scope()` which now maintains the `current_statement_`,
`current_compound_statement_ ` and `current_block_`. This
simplifies statement nesting.
The most significant change in behavior is that statements now
always have a parent, so calling Block() on the initializer or
continuing of a for-loop statement will now return the
BlockStatement that holds the for-loop. Before this would
return nullptr.
Fixed: tint:979
Change-Id: I90e38fd719da2a281ed9210e975ab96171cb6842
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57707
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
The original problem appears to be fixed.
Fixed: tint:219
Change-Id: I8d16fbb715da3ca149769699c86f86a4bed85b4f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57703
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This class is very large, so factoring it out into its own seperate
file.
Also renaming it to InspectorBuilder, in anticipation of adding tests
that don't build their state through explicitly calling into the
ProgramBuilder.
BUG=tint:967
Change-Id: I316458a969479200edf6962ab2008180f9a1e7e2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57800
Auto-Submit: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Use the new semantic constant value information to significantly reduce the complex indexing logic emitted for UBO accesses.
This will dramatically reduce the number of `for` loops that are decayed to `while` loops.
Change-Id: I1b0adb5edde2b4ed39c6beafc2e28106b86e0edd
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57701
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Move the bulk of the constant evaulation logic out of transform::FoldConstants and into Resolver and sem::Expression.
transform::FoldConstants now replace TypeConstructor nodes that have a constant value on the expression.
This is ground work to:
* Cleaning up the HLSL uniform buffer indexing, which is `/` and `%` arithmatic heavy
* Prepares us to handle `constexpr` when it lands in the spec
* Provide a centralized place to do constant evaluation, instead of the
having similar logic scattered around the codebase.
Change-Id: I3e2f542be692046a8d243b62a82556db519953e7
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57426
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
This reverts commit fd5829e5ea.
Reason for revert: Temporarily reverting as this is preventing a tint->dawn roll, which is needed to fix the dawn->chrome roll.
Original change's description:
> Validate storage class constraints
>
> As defined by https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/wgsl/#storage-class-layout-constraints
>
> Bug: tint:643
> Change-Id: I9c78ba69a792a80c263a17b0a6e9b4810fdb7f30
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/56780
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
TBR=bclayton@google.com,amaiorano@google.com,noreply+kokoro@google.com,tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I8dbd0e46b3e3291ef08797a196d0d9abd2a78845
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: tint:643
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57704
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Report whether one was generated so that Dawn knows to use the
`-fpreserve-invariance` compiler option.
Bug: tint:772
Change-Id: Ife1eb05265646727dc864f12f983781af4df3777
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57644
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Make sure the other backends ICE on unrecognized attributes.
Add E2E tests, currently skipped for the other backends.
Bug: tint:772
Change-Id: I4e68d111ff79b19ebb6c574058a91debcb746011
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57642
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
By generating a helper function for these, we can keep the atomic expression pre-statement-free. This can help prevent for-loops from being transformed into while loops.
Change-Id: Id034ea5ea9be601661ddb78db973015d845c420f
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57463
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
By generating a helper function for these, we can keep the atomic expression pre-statement-free. This can help prevent for-loops from being transformed into while loops, which can upset FXC.
We can't do the same for workgroup storage atomics, as the InterlockedXXX() methods have the workgroup-storage expression as the first argument, and I'm not aware of any way to make a user-declared parameter be `groupshared`.
Change-Id: I8669127a58dc9cae95ce316523029064b5c9b5fa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57462
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
And remove the u32 overload of frexp (it's not in the spec).
Brings the number of failing tint end to end tests for MSL down to 19/1098.
The WG still haven't found consensus on reworking these two intrinsics.
It's very likely that their signature will change so that they return a structure instead of returning a value and outputing another as a pointer.
Until the WG makes a decision, let's implement these according to the current spec.
Some overloads are still failing due to MSL missing overloads of the pointer parameter being in the `threadgroup` address space.
I'm holding off fixing these until we know what's happening with these intrinsics.
See also:
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/1480https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/1846
Change-Id: Ib6764e6659d840db41bc65fed2b8b283d1056c3d
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57421
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
The level parameter needs to be zero for a number of texture overloads.
Bodging the template to emit 0 instead of 1 for any `level : i32` parameter is the easiest fix here.
Change-Id: I69222578efcd0d4f4f267fb59fec691b52786d9c
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/57301
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Removes the unneeded texture_external overload of textureSample from
intrinsics.def.
Bug: tint:858
Change-Id: I49935bae47542af7b440c74c96418e005daf9e19
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/53940
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>