All failures are now SKIP'ed.
Bug: tint:1358
Change-Id: If04d57b9e0b71dd877468b5dc277fbff82f36692
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75220
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
Just like for divide, FXC fails with the exact same error when
performing a modulo on a value that FXC determines to be zero. We
address it in the same way as we do for divide.
This also fixes a couple of the vk-gl-cts tests for which I manually
generated expectation files for.
Bug: tint:1083
Change-Id: Ia388bf002112afded542adb791d37e88e35a77ff
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/74220
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
FXC fails to compile when it determines that the rhs of an integral
division is zero with "error X4010: Unsigned integer divide by zero".
bclayton's fix (https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60500)
addressed cases for division by an integer constant 0. This CL adds the
missing support for division by integral vectors with 0 components.
FXC also fails on division by integral expressions that it can fold to
0. To handle these cases, we now emit a runtime check for 0 and replace
by 1. In the cases I've tested, FXC seems able to optimize these checks
away.
Bug: tint:1083
Change-Id: I02f08e9077882f03c1e42b62dacb742a48fa48ba
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/73580
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Skipping those that are block-decorated is not correct, as
block-decorated structures can also have non-buffer usages. This is
even clearer now that WGSL has removed the block attribute.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I6484766a5c541d39e2dc08beb3ae7b889759a3fb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72083
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This removes a lot of awkward logic from the MSL writer, and means
that we now handle all module-scope variables with the same transform.
Change-Id: I782e36a4b88dafbc3f8364f7caa7f95c6ae3f5f1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/67643
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
These operators are not defined in the metal namespace when the vector
operands are packed.
Fixed: tint:1121
Change-Id: I2e8f4302e08117ca41bac6c05fb24a70d1215740
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/62480
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This reverts commit e5dbe24e94.
Reason for revert: Makes the Tint-Dawn roll fails because of
MSL compilation errors on as_type<uint>(-2147483648):
as_type cast from 'long' to 'uint' (aka 'unsigned int') is not allowed
as_type<uint>(-2147483647) compiles fine, so this is most
likely because the MSL compiler types the literal as a long
(since without the - it is larger than the max int32).
Original change's description:
> MSL writer: make signed int overflow defined behaviour
>
> Bug: tint:124
> Change-Id: Icf545b633d6390ceb7f639e80111390005e311a1
> Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60100
> Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
TBR=dneto@google.com,bclayton@google.com,jrprice@google.com,amaiorano@google.com,noreply+kokoro@google.com,tint-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com
Change-Id: I3e3384a9185013bb141a1b7b9b22bad8571bbc50
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: tint:124
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60345
Reviewed-by: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Corentin Wallez <cwallez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/1945 changes the SPIR-V mapping of this operator so that it now maps to OpFRem instead of OpFMod. Polyfill OpFMod with `x - y * floor(x / y)`
Also map the MSL output of this operator to use `fmod()`.
Behavior of this operator is now consistent across all backends.
Fixed: tint:945
Fixed: tint:977
Fixed: tint:1010
Change-Id: Iefa009b905989c55ace24e073ab0e261c7cf69b0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58393
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Tests should be as fine-grained as possible.
Not all the permutations were covered.
Not all the backends were actually generating anything useful, as the
functions were not called by an entry point.
Change-Id: I76658533d3112d202f7482a19531079550e66f83
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/58392
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Stephen White
Antonio Maiorano
James Price
Ben Clayton
Corentin Wallez