Nitz
In GL_CreateTexture function:
if (GL_CheckError("glGenTexures()", renderer) < 0) {
SDL_free(data);
return -1;
}
Here only data is getting free but data->pixels getting leak.
So have to free data->pixels before free data.
Damian Kaczmarek
Basically this bug is probably not a common use case. My goal is to allow rendering totally without a window, for example to a screenshot and I need to rely on SDL_SetRenderTarget to properly work for a purely software renderer created by SDL_CreateSoftwareRenderer.
Pablo Mayobre
When generating a signed app with SDL 2.0.3 an issue comes up, watching at the Error Log points out that the issue lies in the src/main/android/SDL_android_main.c where the process name is defined as "SDL_app", this name turns into an erroneous name so it should be changed to "app_process"
chasesan
When using SDL_RenderCopyEx, I get a problem on some platforms where the output is offset by +/-1 on other platforms and not on others. I tried it with a center of both 0,0 (and offsetting by width/height) and NULL (for centered).
The rotation involved is 90, and/or -90 rotation. The rotation was a constant, no arithmetic was involved when inputting it into SDL_RenderCopyEx.
This occurred with 32x32, 24x24, and 16x16 texture sizes. I apologize that I don't have more precise information, as I received the information as a bug report myself. But I have tracked the problem down to here.
My program requires pixel perfect alignment on several different platforms, so this is something of a showstopper for me.
--
Sylvain
It appears the RenderCopyEx is done as expected,
this is the red rectangle which is not correctly positionned !
So, here's patch with a 0.5 float increment, like for opengles2, for DrawLines, and also Draw Points.
binarycrusader
Since changeset 358696c354a8, SDL 2.0 has been broken on Solaris when compiling with the Solaris Studio compiler (which uses the pthread implementation of SDL_AtomicLock).
Notably, it gets stuck at the MemoryBarrierRelease in SDL_GetErrBuf:
6585 # 218
6586 if (!tls_errbuf && !tls_being_created) {
6587 SDL_AtomicLock_REAL ( & tls_lock );
6588 if (!tls_errbuf) {
6589 SDL_TLSID slot;
6590 tls_being_created = SDL_TRUE;
6591 slot = SDL_TLSCreate_REAL ( );
6592 tls_being_created = SDL_FALSE;
6593 { SDL_SpinLock _tmp = 0 ; SDL_AtomicLock_REAL ( & _tmp ) ; SDL_AtomicUnlock_REAL ( & _tmp ) ; };
^^^ loops forever above
6594 tls_errbuf = slot;
6595 }
6596 SDL_AtomicUnlock_REAL ( & tls_lock );
6597 }
Running: testthread
(process id 28926)
^Cdbx: warning: Interrupt ignored but forwarded to child.
signal INT (Interrupt) in __nanosleep at 0xfe52a875
0xfe52a875: __nanosleep+0x0015: jae __nanosleep+0x23 [ 0xfe52a883, .+0xe ]
Current function is SDL_Delay_REAL
204 was_error = nanosleep(&tv, &elapsed);
(dbx) where
[1] __nanosleep(0xfeffe848, 0xfeffe850, 0xfe75a5ac, 0xfe5169d8), at 0xfe52a875
[2] nanosleep(0xfeffe848, 0xfeffe850), at 0xfe516a3b
=>[3] SDL_Delay_REAL(ms = 0), line 204 in "SDL_systimer.c"
[4] SDL_AtomicLock_REAL(lock = 0xfeffe88c), line 104 in "SDL_spinlock.c"
[5] SDL_GetErrBuf(), line 225 in "SDL_thread.c"
[6] SDL_ClearError_REAL(), line 216 in "SDL_error.c"
[7] SDL_InitSubSystem_REAL(flags = 0), line 116 in "SDL.c"
[8] SDL_Init_REAL(flags = 0), line 244 in "SDL.c"
[9] SDL_Init(a = 0), line 89 in "SDL_dynapi_procs.h"
[10] main(argc = 1, argv = 0xfeffe948), line 65 in "testthread.c"
As far as I can tell, this is because pthread_spin_trylock() always returns EBUSY for this particular lock; since it works in other places, I'm suspicious.
Different Solaris Studio compiler versions seem to make no difference.
I've verified this is broken on Linux as well if SDL_spinlock.c is modified to use the pthread implementation.
This appears to be because pthread_spin_init() and pthread_spin_destroy() are not used with the locks as required.
Wei Mingzhi
surface->map should be invalidated in SDL_SetSurfacePalette(), otherwise the palette would not be effective when blitting to another non-8bit surface which we previously blitted to.
Alex Szpakowski
Some minor changes to the Mac-specific backend code:
- Fixed up some code style issues (mostly brace style inconsistencies).
- Fixed a compiler warning in SDL_cocoaevents.m.
- Removed some useless code now that the 10.7 SDK is required to build SDL.
- Removed Gestalt(gestaltSystemVersion, ...) call and switched to NSAppKitVersionNumber for version checking code. Using Gestalt with gestaltSystemVersion will give 0x1090 in Mac OS 10.10+, and the whole Gestalt function was deprecated in Mac OS 10.8.
Alex Szpakowski
Now that SDL on iOS requires CoreMotion to be linked, some of the Xcode projects included with the SDL source (such as the iOS tests and the iOS app template) as well as the premake and automake scripts need to be updated.
I've attached a patch which does so. It also fixes the SDL Xcode project to build for 64-bit ARM as well as armv7 by default (or whatever the default ARM targets are for the Xcode version used), which is what the iOS app template expects.
Alex Szpakowski
Since this commit https://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/rev/59b543340d63 , calling SDL_DestroyWindow will crash the program if the window has an active OpenGL context.
This is because the Cocoa_DestroyWindow code sets the window's driverdata to NULL and then calls [context setWindow:NULL], which tries to access the window's driverdata, resulting in a null pointer dereference.
I have attached a patch which fixes the issue by moving the line which sets the driverdata to NULL to after the lines which call functions that use the driverdata pointer.
Notes:
- Support for the 'Guide' button does not seem to be possible, as
XInputGetStateEx is not available on WinRT.
- Haptic support appears to be working on WinRT now!
- SDL/WinRT does not allow calls to LoadLibrary or LoadLibraryEx. The calls
to those were removed by this change, but only when compiling for WinRT.
Non-WinRT Windows will continue to detect and load XInput via LoadLibrary and
GetProcAddress calls.
Ryan C. Gordon
Sam Lantinga
Brandon Schaefer
Andreas Schiffler
Shawn Walker
Alex Baines
David Ludwig
Gabriel Jacobo
Alfred Reynolds
J?rgen P. Tjern?