We can also ditch the lock in RAWINPUT_JoystickQuit() now that the joystick
subsystem quits drivers in reverse order. There's no chance of a racing call
to RAWINPUT_WindowProc() anymore.
SDL_WINDOWS_JoystickDriver depends on callbacks in SDL_RAWINPUT_JoystickDriver
and SDL_HIDAPI_JoystickDriver being available. It also manages the common
WindowProc used for joystick detection in both WINDOWS and RAWINPUT drivers.
If we don't tear them down backwards, there's a window of time where we could
invoke RAWINPUT_WindowProc() after RAWINPUT_JoystickQuit() was called.
Since accessing Bluetooth prompts the user for permission on both Android and iOS, and we only need it for Steam Controller support, we'll leave it off by default. You can enable it by setting the hint SDL_HINT_JOYSTICK_HIDAPI_STEAM to "1" before calling SDL_Init()
Fixes https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/4952
macOS 10.6 has some touch NSEvents which do not have a subtype
(Begin/EndGesture, Magnify, Rotate, Swipe) and cause an uncaught
exception which triggers SIGABRT and the program exits.
As it is, none of the macOS 10.6 touch events are detected as a
trackpad (including Gesture due to using different subtypes).
Case fallthrough warnings can be suppressed using the __fallthrough__
compiler attribute. Unfortunately, not all compilers have this
attribute, or even have __has_attribute to check if they have the
__fallthrough__ attribute. [[fallthrough]] is also available in C++17
and the next C2x, but not everyone uses C++17 or C2x.
So define the SDL_FALLTHROUGH macro to deal with those problems - if we
are using C++17 or C2x, it expands to [[fallthrough]]; else if the
compiler has __has_attribute and has the __fallthrough__ attribute, then
it expands to __attribute__((__fallthrough__)); else it expands to an
empty statement, with a /* fallthrough */ comment (it's a do {} while
(0) statement, because users of this macro need to use a semicolon,
because [[fallthrough]] and __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) require a
semicolon).
Clang before Clang 10 and GCC before GCC 7 have problems with using
__attribute__ as a sole statement and warn about a "declaration not
declaring anything", so fall back to using the /* fallthrough */ comment
if we are using those older compiler versions.
Applications using SDL are also free to use this macro (because it is
defined in begin_code.h).
All existing /* fallthrough */ comments have been replaced with this
macro. Some of them were unnecessary because they were the last case in
a switch; using SDL_FALLTHROUGH in those cases would result in a compile
error on compilers that support __fallthrough__, for having a
__attribute__((__fallthrough__)) statement that didn't immediately
precede a case label.
Case fallthrough warnings can be suppressed using the __fallthrough__
compiler attribute. Unfortunately, not all compilers have this
attribute, or even have __has_attribute to check if they have the
__fallthrough__ attribute. [[fallthrough]] is also available in C++17
and the next C2x, but not everyone uses C++17 or C2x.
So define the SDL_FALLTHROUGH macro to deal with those problems - if we
are using C++17 or C2x, it expands to [[fallthrough]]; else if the
compiler has __has_attribute and has the __fallthrough__ attribute, then
it expands to __attribute__((__fallthrough__)); else it expands to an
empty statement, with a /* fallthrough */ comment (it's a do {} while
(0) statement, because users of this macro need to use a semicolon,
because [[fallthrough]] and __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) require a
semicolon).
Applications using SDL are also free to use this macro (because it is
defined in begin_code.h).
All existing /* fallthrough */ comments have been replaced with this
macro. Some of them were unnecessary because they were the last case in
a switch; using SDL_FALLTHROUGH in those cases would result in a compile
error on compilers that support __fallthrough__, for having a
__attribute__((__fallthrough__)) statement that didn't immediately
precede a case label.
This causes lots of spam in test automation and it's not clear it's useful to developers. If we need this level of validation, we should add a log category for it.
Since the haptic subsystem is usually initialized after the joystick subsystem,
the initial calls to HapticMaybeAddDevice() from inside SDL_JoystickInit() will
arrive too early to be handled by the haptic subsystem. We need to add those
haptic devices for those already present joysticks ourselves.
* SDLTest_CommonDrawWindowInfo: log SDL_RenderGetScale, SDL_RenderGetLogicalSize
* testwm2: fix video modes menu hit detection in High DPI cases
- also when logical size is specified, e.g.
`--logical 640x480 --resizable --allow-highdpi`
* add function to determine logical coordinates of renderer point when given window point
* change since to the targeted milestone
* fix typo
* rename for consistency
* Change logical coordinate type to float, since we can render with floating point precision.
* add function to convert logical to window coordinates
* testwm2: use new SDL_RenderWindowToLogical
* SDL_render.c: alternate SDL_RenderWindowToLogical/SDL_RenderLogicalToWindow
Co-authored-by: John Blat <johnblat64@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Blat <47202511+johnblat64@users.noreply.github.com>
The joystick subsystem has complex precedence logic to deal multiple competing
backends like XInput, RawInput, and WGI. Let it fire the MaybeAdd callbacks
for joystick devices, since it knows which backend will end up managing them.
This resolves a situation where the RawInput joystick backend would take
control of an XInput device but the XInput haptic backend would still create
a haptic device. Since the XInput joystick backend didn't own the underlying
joystick device, we'd end up with an orphaned haptic device that didn't work
with SDL_HapticOpenFromJoystick() on the associated joystick device.
A racing reader could read from our fd between SDL_IOReady()/X11_Pending()
and our call to XNextEvent() which will cause XNextEvent() to block for
more data. Avoid this by using XCheckIfEvent() which will never block.
This also fixes a bug where we could poll() for data, even when events were
already read and pending in the queue. Unlike the Wayland implementation,
this isn't totally thread-safe because nothing prevents a racing reader
from reading events into the queue between our XCheckIfEvent() and
SDL_IOReady() calls, but I think this is the best we can do with Xlib.
Ozkan Sezer
Sam Lantinga
Cameron Gutman
Ethan Lee
Sylvain
Zack Middleton
Mathieu Eyraud
Misa
Eric Wasylishen
Susko3
Ryan C. Gordon
Yufei Huang