The structured CFG rule was revised/clarified in SPIR-V 1.6 Rev2
Validation now rejects a few cases.
SpvParserTest, ValueFromBlockNotInBlockOrder
SpvParserFunctionVarTest, EmitStatement_Phi_ValueFromBlockNotInBlockOrderIgnored
SpvParserFunctionVarTest_EmitStatement_Phi_ValueFromBlockNotInBlockOrderIgnored
- Originally from crbug.com/tint/804
Invalid by SPIR-V 1.6 Rev2 update to validation rules:
- Block 80 is a structurally reachable continue target
- Block 25 is not structually reachable, and not part of the loop,
but branches to 80.
vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/cov-dead-branch-func-return-arg/0-opt.*
- The continue construct with the continue target 37[%37]
is not structurally post dominated by the back-edge block 64[%64]
- The SPIRV-Tools inliner no longer creates such cases. It splits the
single-block loop and pushes the continue target down.
vk-gl-cts/graphicsfuzz/nested-for-loops-with-return/0-opt.spvasm
- The loop headed at block 46 does not structurally dominate its merge
block 44. There is a continue-target edge from 41 to 44.
SpvParserCFGTest_ClassifyCFGEdges_BackEdge_MultiBlockLoop_MultiBlockContinueConstruct_ContinueIsHeader.spvasm
SpvParserCFGTest_EmitBody_Loop_MultiBlockContinueIsEntireLoop.spvasm
SpvParserCFGTest_LabelControlFlowConstructs_MultiBlockLoop_HeaderIsContinue.spvasm
SpvParserCFGTest_SiblingLoopConstruct_ContinueIsWholeMultiBlockLoop.spvasm
SpvParserCFGTest, ClassifyCFGEdges_BackEdge_MultiBlockLoop_MultiBlockContinueConstruct_ContinueIsHeader
SpvParserCFGTest, EmitBody_Loop_MultiBlockContinueIsEntireLoop
SpvParserCFGTest, LabelControlFlowConstructs_MultiBlockLoop_HeaderIsContinue
SpvParserCFGTest, SiblingLoopConstruct_ContinueIsWholeMultiBlockLoop
- Continue target 20 also its own loop header, but is not structurally
post-dominated by the backedge block.
- Delete the end-to-end test.
- Keep the unit test because it's about classifying edges, but disable dumping
into the end2end suites.
Change-Id: I9ec2504aadd2fec9ea463901af7dc1b5f47481b5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/95580
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Sinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
For error "access violation. Attempted to read from address
0x0000000000000048", added link to GitHub issue I opened. Helps to
understand what these errors are when reading the expectation files.
Bug: tint:1521
Change-Id: Ie2a1693f021e17586a4fe3b4dfe652bbdc877c49
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/88363
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
And force shader code to always use LF endings.
Post merge, there were a number of files that crept in with CRLF endings.
Some Tint end-to-end tests take objection to CRLF endings.
CRLF endings can be detected with:
```
git grep -I --files-with-matches --perl-regexp '\r' HEAD
```
And fixed with:
```
find . -type f -exec dos2unix {} \;
```
Bug: dawn:1339
Change-Id: Iee054bafd15875de744b86e28393cd8229bd3cfa
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/86140
Kokoro-Run: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Added a new transform::RemoveContinueInSwitch that replaces continue
statements in switch cases with setting a bool variable, and checking if
the variable is set after the switch to continue.
Bug: tint:1080
Change-Id: I3c0a6c790e1bb612fac3f927a4bd5beb2d0d4ed1
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/84960
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Implement new transform UnwindDiscardFunctions that replaces discard
statements with setting a module-level bool, adds a check and return for
this bool after every function call that may discard, and finally
invokes a single function that executes a discard from top-level
functions.
Regenerated tests and remove HLSL ones that used to fail FXC because it
had difficulty with discard.
Bug: tint:1478
Bug: chromium:1118
Change-Id: I09d680f59e2d5d0cad907bfbbdd426aae76d4bf3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/84221
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
In GLSL, runtime-sized arrays are only valid in interface blocks, not
in structs. The existing code was attempting to avoid emitting structs
containing runtime-sized arrays but was confused by type aliases in
the AST resulting in arrays being missed.
The fix is to do the work on the semantic types instead, where type
aliases have been resolved.
Bug: tint:1339
Change-Id: I8c305ee9bddd75f975dd13f1d19d623d71410693
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/82360
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
