When these are used inside a function, we were not unwrapping the
array from the struct that we wrapped it in.
Fixed: tint:1385
Change-Id: Ide7bbd802394bf09819265be48d978ec9346adfe
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77180
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Don't generate them either, which generated a lot of test churn.
Fixed: tint:1380
Change-Id: I0a7cfdd2ef0ffe8e7fda111fbc57997b36b949e0
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/77165
Auto-Submit: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Use the sem::Type size instead of the sem::Struct size.
Some binding numbers in MSL expected outputs changed since these
buffers were previously not being reported in the resource list that
the Tint exe uses to automatically remap bindings.
Bug: tint:1372
Change-Id: I14479ddc5129d91b91449cc2d68ee37bd99d2f7e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76220
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Use the AddSpirvBlockDecoration transform to do this.
Add expected results for all of the new E2E tests. The arrayLength()
tests all fail as this is not yet implemented for the GLSL
backend. The other tests all pass except two that assign whole structs
to buffers, which is also a pre-existing issue.
Bug: tint:1372
Change-Id: I230197b43a5561e619866419d642ffc1ed085aac
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76164
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These two transforms previously assumed that the argument to
arrayLength had the form `&struct_var.array_member`. We now also need
to handle the case where it is just `&array_var`.
Bug: tint:1372
Change-Id: I173a84bd32c324445573a295b281a51e291c2ae2
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76163
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
For SPIR-V, wrap non-struct types in structs in the
AddSpirvBlockDecoration transform.
For MSL, wrap runtime-sized arrays in structs in the
ModuleScopeVarToEntryPointParam transform.
Bug: tint:1372
Change-Id: Icced5d77b4538e816aa9fab57a634a9f4c52fdab
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76162
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Add google benchmark to the DEPs.
Implement a basic set of benchmarks for each of the writers and the WGSL parser.
Add build rules for CMake. GN build rules TODO.
Add a simple go tool (ported from Marl) to diff two benchmarks. Less
noisy than the one provided by google benchmark.
Bug: tint:1378
Change-Id: I73cf92c5d9fd2d3bfac8f264864fd774afbd5d01
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76840
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Most of this change is fixing up the numerious tests that violated this rule.
Fixed: tint:1365
Issue: tint:1374
Change-Id: I38da27c7367277fe60857208170fec017e80bd25
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76400
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Remove the ICE check for expression behaviors always being either `{Next}` or `{Next, Discard}`. Unreachable code may be result in something else.
Add the RemoveUnreachableStatements transform to the SPIR-V writer sanitizer transform list. The writer cannot correctly handle unreachable statements.
Bug: tint:1369
Bug: chromium:1285622
Change-Id: I9fa54c6d2096b1ee633dd551b628c7dd3ba64fb5
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/76300
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
PromoteInitializersToConstVar was erroring on for loops that contained array or structure constructor expressions.
Added lots more tests.
Fixed: tint:1364
Change-Id: I033eaad94756ea496fc8bc5f03f39c6dba4e3a88
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75580
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This is what its called in the spec.
Issue: tint:1361
Change-Id: I512c4224191fd2bbf04522da2093872f79ee02a6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75581
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
All failures are now SKIP'ed.
Bug: tint:1358
Change-Id: If04d57b9e0b71dd877468b5dc277fbff82f36692
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75220
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
Constructing a null vector, matrix or array does not need to provide an explicit list of null elements. `T()` is a more efficient and readable equivalent.
Fuzzers like to generate enormous pathological composite types, which has been triggering OOM failures.
Bug: oss-fuzz:38095
Bug: oss-fuzz:39235
Bug: oss-fuzz:39246
Bug: oss-fuzz:39874
Change-Id: I910bb04bdd0e80532c09fc038be895ec37d3d380
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/75426
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Just like for divide, FXC fails with the exact same error when
performing a modulo on a value that FXC determines to be zero. We
address it in the same way as we do for divide.
This also fixes a couple of the vk-gl-cts tests for which I manually
generated expectation files for.
Bug: tint:1083
Change-Id: Ia388bf002112afded542adb791d37e88e35a77ff
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/74220
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Also ensure correct paramter ordering: bias is always after offset.
Bug: tint:1351
Change-Id: I41ee66b86cd9d912f3857e5377b660c50d035c6e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/73720
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
FXC fails to compile when it determines that the rhs of an integral
division is zero with "error X4010: Unsigned integer divide by zero".
bclayton's fix (https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/60500)
addressed cases for division by an integer constant 0. This CL adds the
missing support for division by integral vectors with 0 components.
FXC also fails on division by integral expressions that it can fold to
0. To handle these cases, we now emit a runtime check for 0 and replace
by 1. In the cases I've tested, FXC seems able to optimize these checks
away.
Bug: tint:1083
Change-Id: I02f08e9077882f03c1e42b62dacb742a48fa48ba
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/73580
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Change-Id: I32aaefe71ea728ae5118de08e5dd9073ddf2269e
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/73740
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
This picks up validation to ensure a struct of builtins on
the input or output interface is also decorated with Block.
See https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIRV-Tools/pull/4665
Fix SPIR-V in end2end tests that was breaking the rule.
Change-Id: Ic0e9c8936eb6b3f086b084d86b649e9e237fc3b3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/73242
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
* Fixed DXC installation so that we download the latest release, and
patch it with the latest artifact build. This ensures that the correct
dxil.dll is next to dxc.exe, rather than having dxc.exe pick up whatever
dxil.dll is in PATH.
* To run tests with FXC requires the correct d3dcompiler_47.dll. To do
this, I modified the script to download the Windows SDK, and install
only the feature that contains the DLL.
* To avoid issues with DXC and FXC finding exes/dlls in PATH, modified
the script to temporarily set PATH as needed.
Bug: tint:940
Change-Id: Ic83b0b97f72ccc1f37b4b495eae6a6ab3421a95a
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72560
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
FXC fails to compile code that assigns to dynamically-indexed fixed-size
arrays in structs on internal shader variables with:
error X3500: array reference cannot be used as an l-value; not natively
addressable
This CL detects this case, and transforms such assignments into copying
out the array to a local variable, assigning to that local, and then
copying the array back.
Also manually regenerate SKIPs for HLSL/FXC after this change, which
fixes 30 tests. Also exposes some "compilation aborted unexpectedly" now
that "array reference cannot be used as an l-value" has been fixed. For
tests that fail for both DXC and FXC, updating SKIPs to the DXC one to
help distinguish actual FXC bugs from valid errors.
Bug: tint:998
Bug: tint:1206
Change-Id: I09204d8d81ab27d1c257538ad702414ccc386543
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71620
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
The GLSL emitted for these was invalid, and we don't need these
structs since they're only used as the store types of buffers, which
are handled elsewhere.
Change-Id: I17c15e408b5c36e9b895e5950528a6d02d1802a6
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72381
Reviewed-by: Stephen White <senorblanco@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This attribute is now deprecated, and the warning is causing these
tests to fail.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I0665c9f3b657c8cb56e2252a23eb6184ea876075
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72420
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
This has been deprecated and will soon be removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: If5dbbc3a40d7591591fb2802dbe9c8dd5f96d299
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72087
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
These are no longer necessary and will soon be deprecated and removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I3fa076e7ce5eb36466d24c80fd1c83658c28c5ab
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72086
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Skipping those that are block-decorated is not correct, as
block-decorated structures can also have non-buffer usages. This is
even clearer now that WGSL has removed the block attribute.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: I6484766a5c541d39e2dc08beb3ae7b889759a3fb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72083
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Any struct which is used as the store type of a buffer variable needs
to have a block decoration. If that struct is nested inside an array
or another struct, we wrap it inside another struct first.
This removes the SPIR-V backend's reliance on the [[block]] attribute,
which will soon be deprecated and removed.
Bug: tint:1324
Change-Id: Ib6ad54f24a3e4a090da9faeed699f266abcb66ba
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72082
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
These test vector constructors with an explicit element type.
Bug: tint:1334
Change-Id: I3d0f626e42850e841cffd70241274e32dcb75fbb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72142
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Move these under test/expressions, and rework the directory structure so we can test vector arguments and inferred element types.
Bug: tint:1334
Change-Id: I411fd7ce1ecdd50c6ef9b79be8407c09a6d38240
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/72140
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
This fixes errors like "error X3500: array reference cannot be used as
an l-value; not natively addressable". Note that FXC treats matrices
like arrays. We still get this error for dynamically indexed arrays in
structs.
Also improved HLSL assign tests, and add missing ones for vector
indexing.
Manually removed 20 e2e skip hlsl SKIP files that are now passing with
this change.
Bug: tint:1333
Change-Id: If23881a667857a4d4ec6881e72666af0a666ef10
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71982
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
All writers implemented, along with resolving and validation.
TODO: SPIR-V Reader.
Bug: tint:1330
Change-Id: I8ba2f6023749474f80efb8a5422ac187e6c73a69
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71820
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
It seems we haven't run our e2e tests with FXC validation in a long time
- at least not since we've added the vk-gl-cts corpus.
Locally disabled exclusion of "/test/vk-gl-cts/" in test-runner/main.go,
and ran:
./test/test-all.sh out/build/x64-Debug/tint.exe --format hlsl --fxc --generate-skip
These will need to be manually removed once the skips aren't needed by
deleting them all, and re-running as above.
Bug: tint:940
Change-Id: I27e395e69f5e1bd7d234f3155f40396b751720d4
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71981
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Fix dependency graph traversal for bitcasts. These were not being traversed, leading to an ICE if the bitcast type was an alias, as the symbol was not resolved for later use by the resolver.
Add missing validation for bitcasts. We were permitting any bitcast that wasn't a being cast to a pointer type, when the spec only allows:
* numeric_scalar to numeric_scalar
* vecN<numeric_scalar> to vecN<numeric_scalar>
Add lots of tests.
Fixed: chromium:1276320
Change-Id: I9e5487ec7649ac543f73fc878e7e282bf932d8cb
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71681
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Migrate some of the validation logic over to use the results of behavior
analysis.
The most significant changes are:
* Unreachable-statements now consider merge-points of control flow. For
example, if all branches of a if-statement or switch-statement either
return or discard, the next statement will be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements are no longer an error, but a warning. See
https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/2378.
* Statements that follow a loops that does not break, or have a
conditional will now be considered unreachable.
* Unreachable statements produced by the SPIR-V reader are now removed
using the new RemoveUnreachableStatements transform.
Some other new changes include additional validation for the continuing
block for for-loops, to match the rules of a loop continuing block.
The new cases this validation is testing for are not expressible in
WGSL, but some transforms may produce complex continuing statements that
might violate these rules. All the writers are able to decay these
complex for-loop continuing statements to regular loops.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: I0d8a48c73d5d5c30a1cddf92cc3383a692a58e61
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71500
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This change implements the behavior analysis for expressions and
statements as described in:
https://www.w3.org/TR/WGSL/#behaviors
This CL makes no changes to the validation rules. This will be done as a
followup change.
Bug: tint:1302
Change-Id: If0a251a7982ea15ff5d93b54a5cc5ed03ba60608
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/68408
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
This new expectation file was added with a similar parent that changed the expected output.
Bug: tint:1112
Change-Id: Icb6175f68b6459385933d39e07460eb863ecb9ff
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71101
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Now that I've landed this change to Dawn to disable FXC optimizations:
https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/dawn/+/70700,, we can reland this
change. The Tint-into-Dawn roll was failing because FXC would miscompile
certain loops into infinite loops when not unrolled.
Also reland
test/bug/fxc/gradient_in_varying_loop/1112.wgsl.expected.hlsl
Bug: tint:1112
Bug: dawn:1203
Change-Id: I641d68864b833e0fbe3b117d397b89ae96482536
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/71000
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
If we encounter a global twice, the stack vector was not popped, which could trigger false cyclic-dependency errors. Because the cyclic dependency did not actually exist, later logic could break, expecting to find a global->global edge which did not exist.
Fixed: chromium:1273451
Change-Id: I9d99f1aeeaea042d9ed847a878c4717803122240
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70980
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
It's surprising that the fuzzers didn't find this, but I've confirmed that at least one of the fuzzers will fail with this case.
By adding a e2e test case, this will be used as a seed for the fuzzer corpus.
Bug: tint:1321
Change-Id: Ibf4bfa50bf376ae4cba401dfc31a2498fa3b9eec
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70982
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
RemovePhonies was transforming:
_ = f32(1)
_ = vec2<f32>(1.0, 2.0)
into:
f32(1)
vec2<f32>(1.0, 2.0)
Which the resolver gets grumpy about, as these are expressions, not statements.
Fixed: chromium:1273230
Change-Id: Ie85d3cee705fa3f792db686c021d76331e241f17
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70960
Auto-Submit: Ben Clayton <bclayton@google.com>
Commit-Queue: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
Kokoro: Ben Clayton <bclayton@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Price <jrprice@google.com>
BUG=tint:1019
Change-Id: Ia462080877a97348c5589bfa71231a832a7ebfd3
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70081
Auto-Submit: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ryan Harrison <rharrison@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Maiorano <amaiorano@google.com>
Add transform::Unshadow to renamed shadowed symbols. Required by a
number of other transforms.
Replace Resolver symbol resolution with dep-graph.
The dependency graph now performs full symbol resolution before the
regular resolver pass.
Make use of this instead of duplicating the effort.
Simplfies code, and actually performs variable shadowing consistently.
Fixed: tint:819
Bug: tint:1266
Change-Id: I595d1812aebe1d79d2d32e724ff90de36e74cf4b
Reviewed-on: https://dawn-review.googlesource.com/c/tint/+/70523
Reviewed-by: David Neto <dneto@google.com>
Kokoro: Kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>